Mexican War Justified

464 Words1 Page

Was the United States Justified in Going to War With Mexico?

Is manifest destiny enough to rightfully go to war? Mexico wanted to keep Texas as there own, but Texas was annexed by the United States. Mexico and the U.S. fought over disputed territory. Did the U.S. have good reasons to go to war with Mexico? The United States were not justified in going to war with Mexico because they didn't need a war, Polk provoked it, and America was seen as robbing Mexico's land.

One reason the Mexican war was not justified was they might not even need a war in the first place. “California will probably, next fall away from [Mexico],” according to John L O’Sullivan from “Annexation.” This supports my reason because if they were so certain that they could easily get this land, why go to war? Also, John L O’Sullivan from “Annexation” said, “The Anglo-Saxon foot is already on [California] borders.” This evidence shows that the United States was not justified in going to war because if people already moved there, what is the need to fight. …show more content…

“[In early 1846, on Polk's orders] the troops commanded by General Zachary Taylor arrived at the Rio Grande,” according to Jesus Velasco-Marquez from “A Mexican Viewpoint on the War with the United States.” This explains my reasoning because Polk ordered the troops to arrive there, and thus started the battles leading to the war. Another piece of evidence from “A Mexican Viewpoint on the War with the United States.” by Jesus Velasco-Marquez, “The mobilization of the US army was an outright attack on Mexico.” This additional evidence shows how the United States started the war with no

Open Document