Merton Interreligious Dialogue Analysis

859 Words2 Pages

An aspect of interreligious dialogue which Merton believed to be the most important for an authentic dialogue was the admission of past wrongdoing. Merton constantly writes about the injustices performed by Christians to those of other religions, in an attempt of asking for the others’ forgiveness. In a letter to Suzuki from April 1959, a letter from the early stages of their friendship, Merton comments on injustices done to the east, saying:
I feel obliged to say this because of the huge burden of sins of the Western world, the burden of our sins toward the east: sins committed in the name of the Good and even in the name of Christ. I want to speak for this Western world which has been and is so utterly wrong…we have shamed the Truth of Christ …show more content…

For two months, Merton traveled through various parts of Asia, India, Thailand, Nepal, and Sri Lanka. There, he gave several lectures on interreligious dialogue and Catholicism, as well as learned from many of his contemporaries of various religious backgrounds. Although Merton tragically died during this trip, it was still extremely important to shaping his view of Buddhists. In one lecture, he said “I have left my monastery to come here not just as a research scholar or even as an author (which I also happen to be). I come as a pilgrim who is anxious to obtain not just information, not just “facts” about other monastic traditions, but to drink from ancient sources of monastic vision and experience…to become a better and more enlightened monk” Here, Merton was able to leave his monastery and fully engage with the religion he had been in dialogue in for so many years—not just depend on his own private …show more content…

Nostra Aetate touches upon many of the subjects practiced in Mertons’s study. These include focusing on the similarities of religions as well as the belief that other religions can strengthen your own faith. William Apel, in Signs of Peace: The Interfaith Letters of Thomas Merton, writes on Merton’s revolutionary relationship with other religions. He writes. “It is hard to remember in the twenty-first century just how new the terms ecumenism and interfaith dialogue are. Certainly, from a Roman Catholic perspective, they were virtually unheard of prior to the Second Vatican Council, just forty years ago. Yet, prior to the Second Vatican Council, Merton had begun dialoguing…” Merton himself embraces Nostra Aetate’s message and comments upon it in his writings. In Mystics and Zen Masters, he quotes Nostra Aetate and draws upon its message by saying “The Church rejects nothing which is true and holy in these religions’ says the Council, and it adds that the purpose of dialogue should be to combine ‘the sincere witness of Christian faith with the understanding and preservation and promotion of the spiritual and moral goods found in other cultures. '” Merton’s view of other religions and their relationship with Catholicism lead the way for further Church teaching on interreligious

Open Document