Mere Christianity Analysis

902 Words2 Pages

Mere Christianity In C.S Lewis’s Mere Christianity, Lewis provides his thoughts and beliefs on the subject of Christianity by setting up a logical breakdown of why Christians and humans in general behave the way they do. The first book Right And Wrong As A Clue To The Meaning Of The Universe has a lot to be discussed with in it. It describes the simple law of human nature and the concept of right and wrong.
I believe that Lewis is right when he talks about there being a moral code. I think that each individual society has a set of standards they go by, people might not even be sure why they follow them or who made them; all they know is what they were taught by their elders growing up. For the most part, these sets conventions are not questioned they are simply followed in order to conform to one’s society. A statement he made that I thought was an extremely valid point to bring up was that we often judge one another pretty harshly thinking that one set of …show more content…

Buddhists don’t pray to any specific God like being, they follow strict teachings of the Buddha and hope to seek enlightenment. Buddhism, in my opinion, is completely impersonal. To reach enlightenment they must learn to become detached and accept that there is evil in the world. The four noble truths say to accept that suffering comes from desire (wanting things) so in order to stop suffering one must learn to do without and this will bring them closer to their ultimate goal. This extremely different from the Christian way of praying to a God who is good and sort of ignoring the evil in the world.
Lewis’s views on Christianity were very insightful through out the book and the way he broke up his thoughts were structured and organized. The information was fair, well thought out and it felt very fact based. C.S Lewis is an intelligent man and I feel that I learned quite a bit about social and moral laws and how they play into

Open Document