Mental Problematic Consequences of Warfare

945 Words2 Pages

Participation in warfare can create dramatic conditions and experiences for the mental health and well-being of military personnel. During the 20th century, US military psychiatrists attempted to deal with the mental problematic consequences of warfare while also helping to achieve to the military goal of preserving the number of people available for work, and decreasing the weakening impact of psychiatric syndromes by implementing screening programs to detect factors that would predispose individuals to mental disorders, providing early intervention strategies for difficult war-related syndromes, and treating long-term psychiatric disability after deployment. The results of screening has proven disappointing, the effects of the treatment near the front lines have become unclear, and the results of treatment for chronic postwar syndromes are mixed. After the Persian Gulf War, a number of military physicians made innovative proposals for a population-based approach, anchored in primary care instead of specialty-based care. This approach appears to hold the most promise for the future. In the story the story “Things They Carried” by Tim O’brien speaks of the soldiers multiple burdens that they carried individually. They carried emotions of the fear yet to come, their families that may have been left behind. It is also speaking of their literal physical loads they carry as soldiers. Though the physical loads effect the soldiers, the most influential to them is their emotional problems. The “load” represented in the story are the soldiers many burdens of fear responsibility, vulnerability , and their reputations. These burdens such as fear will only make one weak on the battle field making them fall victim to enemies and possibly ... ... middle of paper ... ...ength and clear up the stress that would have prevented soldiers from thinking clearly otherwise. Psychiatric improvements have led to proposition of screening processes: “Salmon advised the US armed forces to screen recruits and exclude “insane, feeble-minded, psychopathic, and neuropathic individuals.” ( 2) These individuals with conditions such a as schizophrenia and mental retardation were seen to limit the soldiers ability to provide adequate service. Therefore preventing psychiatric issues during war became an important tool to success. By screening out potential soldiers that may have had mental issues, psychiatrists were believed to have contributed heavily to the war efforts. The psychiatrist put their attention on selection because they believed that screening of volunteers and inductees would “weed out soldiers that would be predisposed to breakdown.

Open Document