Exploring Controversies and Risks of the MMR Vaccine

565 Words2 Pages

The Measles, Mumps ad Rubella (MMR) Vaccine was introduced as part of a vaccination programme in 1988, to vaccinate against three viruses, Morbillivirus measles virus, Rubulavirus (Mumps), and Rubivirus (Rubella), which caused three diseases which were commonplace in society before the start of the vaccination programme, and could often have fatal consequences. In this essay I intend to explore the controversy and risks associated with this vaccination and its components. The MMR Vaccine is administered as part of a vaccination programme in the UK to children between the ages of twelve to thirteen months, and then at the age of three years and four months as a ‘booster’. This vaccine is a live, but attenuated vaccine, containing a weakened strain of each of the three viruses, used in order to provoke an immune response from the patient and provide them with future protection from the viruses if a secondary infection was to …show more content…

This means that there are no foreign proteins present which could cause an anaphylactic response. However, other components, aside from the ‘active ingredients’ of the vaccine can have harmful side effects. For example, gelatine, used to protect the living viruses against the affect of temperature changes and as a stabiliser in the MMR (MMR VaxPro only), can cause an anaphylactic response in those with an allergy to gelatine (around one in two million people), which could potentially be fatal. Sorbitol, another stabiliser used in the MMR (MMR VaxPro and Priorix vaccines) also poses a risk to those who have inherited fructose intolerance, causing symptoms such as vomiting and nausea, but can ultimately lead to coma and convulsions if the source of the symptoms is not

More about Exploring Controversies and Risks of the MMR Vaccine

Open Document