Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of horror movies
Gender inequality in the movie industry
Women in contemporary horror contemporary horror
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of horror movies
This article was very informing to me on how old school horror fans feel about new horror movies, their characters, and their villains. Matt Haigh wrote this article said that he loves horror movies, but he hates how they have been done in recent history of horror movies. He enlightened us on many different aspects of a horror movie and how they have been butchered in most horror movies that have come out recently. For the first page of this article I agree with Haigh completely, but the second and third pages of the article made me think about the aspects he talked about a little bit more. The beginning paragraphs of this article are extremely agreeable to me and the first point he talks about is agreeable as well. Although the rest of the …show more content…
The beginning paragraphs even made some important points to support his own opinion of modern horror movies. I agreed with most of the points in these paragraphs because I thought that he was correct and was right about how good horror is great and how bad horror can be really bad. In the first one of the main points he decided to argue about, he talked about empty characters and how the characters in modern horror movies have no emotional ties with the audience. He goes so far as to say, “After all, why should we care if somebody gets killed when they're presented to us as being an empty vessel?” (Haigh 1). I totally agree with this statement because most of the modern horror movies I have seen are really bad at portraying a character and making the audience care about that person. In classics like Texas Chainsaw, Friday the 13th, or Nightmare on Elmstreet, you feel very attached to the main character and you want her to live and survive through the movie. He says, “ Thus, our emotional response to their torture and ultimate demise proved greater for the time we had invested in getting to know them” (Haigh 1). I agree because nowadays the director doesn’t really set the characters up or give the audience a reason to love that specific …show more content…
What he is saying is that in all the modern horror movies there is a “damsel in distress” and a male hero to come save her from the horrible monster that is the villain (Haigh 2). He says that these ideas in horror filmmaking come mainly from the fact that the directors are almost always male (Haigh 2). He also says that he wishes they would switch it up and have the girls be the heroes, monsters, or both (Haigh 2). He makes me disagree with him because I believe that it makes a better movie with the girl being saved and the monster being some huge plotting guy instead of a girl, mainly because I just don’t think that a girl running around with a knife is very scary for a horror movie’s
I have provided a clear evaluation of his essay in an organized way using the appropriate standards of evaluation. In understanding why humans “Crave Horror Movies” even when some people get nightmares after watching them we find the importance of our emotions and fears. We find those emotions and fears form a body of their own which needs to be maintained properly in order to remain healthy. We see how emotions can be controlled though viewing horror movies. Stephen King’s “Why We Crave Horror Movies” is a well written essay with convincing analogies, comparisons, and urban humor.
2. According to Sobchack, contemporary screen violence greatly differs than portrayals of violence in years past. Today, violent scenes are careless and lack significance because we as audiences have become calloused and desensitized to any acts of violence. She states that there is “no grace or benediction attached to violence. Indeed, its very intensity seems diminished” (Sobchack 432). Senseless violence, gruesome acts, and profound amounts of gore are prevalent in movies today, and because even this is not enough, it must be accompanied by loud blasts and noise, constantly moving scenes to keep audiences stimulated and large quantities of violence for viewers to enjoy what they are watching. Decades ago, it was the story that was engaging to audiences and filmmaking was an art.
...usion, we find that from this essay we have a better understanding of why Stephen King believes all of us are mentally ill in some way, just maybe not to as high a degree as “Jack the ripper”. That we all enjoy the hunt either on the big screen or in a field, it’s part of our primal instincts. We see that humans crave things they are not supposed to and that’s ok as long as you are letting those emotions out in a healthy way. Stephen King has done a brilliant job of carrying out his thesis in this essay proving his theory that we are all mentally ill. We all need some way to release the dark feelings within us, we have all known this for many years, and movies seem to be the most current form of treatment. So treat yourself to a horror movie if you dare its great therapy.
His experimental and unique perverse screenwriting has shocked and inspired numerous people. His aesthetics painted horror vividly and presented itself dramatically. His musical and cinematic vision was a healthy extension of his devilishly, clever, and demented mind. His modes of publication with music, film and print, had and still a tremendous fanbase. He has gained our attention in every media related forum and we can’t look away, even if we try. He has left us cheering, screaming and on the edge of our seats. We leave feeling bad about ourselves for watching his visual storytelling unfold. “You know, it’s like, I’m going to sit here for 90 minutes and watch these guys get fucked up with no hope. That’s what I love about these films, you walk out feeling bad about yourself, saying “Why did I enjoy that? What does this say about me as a person?” It is a cathartic experience that horror lovers can have again and again. Not acting on those horrific urges, but instead, becoming one of his characters that were just never really understood and that evil is real. Evil never dies and revenge always wins or at least in horror
The article Why We Crave Horror Movies by Stephen King distinguishes why we truly do crave horror movies. Stephen King goes into depth on the many reasons on why we, as humans, find horror movies intriguing and how we all have some sort of insanity within us. He does this by using different rhetorical techniques and appealing to the audience through ways such as experience, emotion and logic. Apart from that he also relates a numerous amount of aspects on why we crave horror movies to our lives. Throughout this essay I will be evaluating the authors arguments and points on why society finds horror movies so desirable and captivating.
One aspect of American horror movies is the fact that everything is rationalized in the movies. There is a need in American culture to explain why things happen. This is also shown in the endings. Conflicts are always resolved at the end of movies and everything is explained because as the audience, we want to know that the conflict is over and we want all the unexplained details to be explained. The antagonists of horror movies are usually malicious monsters that are there to cause havoc. They may or may not have a grudge against a specific
The logic behind heaping plaudits on the upscale slashers and highbrow horror pictures lies, as with foreign horror, with the concept of aesthetic distance. Film analyst Ken Hanke theorizes that many critics simply praise so-called highbrow horror films because the acclaim comes from "people with little or no knowledge of the genre...What seemed so fresh and creative to them was largely a reshuffling of a very old bag of tricks."
I saw no rough cuts of IWTV; I saw no clips. I went to no screenings. It wasn't until David Geffen, himself took the unusual risk of sending me a VHS tape of the movie, that I saw it. And I approached this tape with a deep fear of being hurt, crushed, disappointed, destroyed by the finished work.
Stephen King is one of the greatest authors in history, and will forever be timeless in our hearts and minds. It’s truly amazing how king is able to unearth our deepest fears and bring them to life. He is a major contribution to the literature world of horror, with over three hundred and fifty million copies sold but some critics feel that he is not worthy of being in the same category as The best horror authors. King has revolutionized horror by turning it into something readable for everyone; he makes our fears a reality that we must overcome. He understands all of the defining moments in our lives such as, expressions of loss, and the dreaded terror of the unknown. There should be no doubt that Stephen will remain the modern face of horror despite what ridiculers may state.
Modern day horror films are very different from the first horror films which date back to the late nineteenth century, but the goal of shocking the audience is still the same. Over the course of its existence, the horror industry has had to innovate new ways to keep its viewers on the edge of their seats. Horror films are frightening films created solely to ignite anxiety and panic within the viewers. Dread and alarm summon deep fears by captivating the audience with a shocking, terrifying, and unpredictable finale that leaves the viewer stunned. (Horror Films)
This was effective because by stating that “we’re all mentally ill” (King 414) right off the bat readers will be compelled to continue reading. He might have offended some readers by questioning their mental state but this is inconsequential because it is easier to change a reader’s feelings if they actually read the piece which is what his opening statement insures. His introduction commands attention and requires a strong logical argument to back up this claim. King also does this effectively. As a published writer King knows how to manipulate words and phrases to use in a way that fits his purposes. It was by this skill that he was able to normalize fears and horror movies to transition into his thesis. King gives three reasons for why it is such popular genre to watch, “to show that we can, that we are not afraid…” (414), “to re-establish our feelings of essential normality” (414), and “to have fun” (414). He normalized the phenomenon and logically explained each of these claims. Another effective part of his essay was to establish cause and effect. King illustrated what happens when we submit to our insanity or when we control our emotion by sharing an anecdote about children and the reinforcement they receive from parents and society. He even goes to explain which actions will elicits positive reinforcement and likewise which prompts negative
Horror movies have been part of mainstream cinema since the early 1930s when films such as Dracula and Frankenstein were created. As the horror genre evolved, so did the stories in the films. Friday the 13th (Marcus Nipsel, 2009) is a very good example of this evolution. Even though it is a remake, Friday the 13th changed the way horror movies were seen by the audience. The ideas and theory behind this slasher sub-genre of horror films can be summed up in a book. Carol Clover, an American professor of film studies, wrote a book in 1992 entitled Men, Women, and Chainsaws: Gender in the Modern Horror Film in which she described the horror film genre. In a chapter entitled “Her Body, Himself”, Clover describes how weapons play a very important role in horror movies as well as explaining her Final Girl theory. Her book’s ideas changed not only academic notions but also popular beliefs on horror films. The 2009 remake of Friday the 13th implies that Carol Clover’s ideas about 80s slasher films, including male tormentors, the importance of weapons, and the Final Girl, have stayed the same through the years.
...d film aesthetics? Simple, because he asks questions that are still relevant to society today. His views on certain morals and psychological corruption is depicted in exaggerated forms of violence, that perhaps he feels an emotional connection with. It is certain that this could be because of his strict religious upbringing and being told that everything and everyone is evil. And growing up through a period in time where you’re exposed to violence around every corner, can certainly make someone question their faith in what’s and good and what’s evil and is it ok to expose that evil. As Craven states in an interview, “ A lot in life is dealing with your curse, dealing with the cards you were given that aren’t so nice. Does it make you into a monster, or can you temper or accept it and go in some other direction?” (R. Mancini & W. Craven, personal communication, 2004).
Doubtlessly, our movie producers around the world are making a decent attempt to make us dread and fear, on the grounds that a decent blood and gore movie can make our 'night'.
Stanley Kubrick's The Shining (1980) initially received quite a bit of negative criticism. The film irritated many Stephen King fans (and King himself) because it differed so greatly from the novel. The Shining also disappointed many filmgoers who expected a conventional slasher film. After all, Kubrick said it would be "the scariest horror movie of all time."1 Kubrick's films, however, never fully conform to their respective genres; they transcend generic expectations. In the same way that 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) is not just another outer-space sci-fi flick, The Shining is not a typical horror movie. The monsters in The Shining originate not from dark wooded areas, but from the recesses of the mysterious human mind-in broad daylight, at that. Perhaps Kubrick said The Shining is "the scariest horror movie of all time" not because it offers a bit of suspense, blood, and gore, but because it shines a light on the inherently evil nature of humankind on psychological and sociological levels.