Critical analysis of Mary Barra’s testimony to Congress
General Motors Ignition Switch Recall General Motors CEO Mary Barra and David Friedman, acting manager of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, affirmed at a hearing on the automaker's start switch review. The imperfection was connected to no less than twelve passing. Ms. Barra in her opening articulation apologized to the general population, casualties, and groups of casualties, and said that she and the organization were focused on making the best choice. She likewise reported that she had propelled an inside request and that individuals would be considered responsible when the examination was finished. Among different changes, Ms. Barra said GM had contracted pay master
…show more content…
GM CEO Mary Barra apologized for passing’s connected to a start switch the organization knew was imperfect yet neglected to supplant or to advise purchasers about for over 10 years.
. Under direct addressing about whether GM acknowledged duty regarding the fatalities, Barra evaded. "I again need to repeat, we think the circumstance is awful, and we apologize," she said.
. Barra over and over purported numbness of the points of interest of interior GM basic leadership, saying she was sitting tight for the aftereffects of an inward examination. Barra said she didn't know why GM had kept on utilizing the switches after specialists decided they didn't meet the organization's particulars, and she said she didn't know why GM had not doled out another part number to a substitution switch it started utilizing as a part of 2006.
. Family individuals from crash casualties sat in the listening to room, with photos of the casualties propped along the back divider. "I am profoundly sad," Barra said.
Mary Barra, the beset CEO of General Motors, showed up before Congress on Tuesday loaded with statements of regret yet offering couple of clarifications for the auto goliath's years-long inability to settle a start change deformity connected to 13
she received was fair as I believe her manner of speaking to her CEO was just plain Unprofessional.
Kennedy entertains the rights of companies, that their decisions “ought to be freely and privately made.” Therefore, the American people have the right “to expect in return for that freedom, a higher sense of business responsibility for the welfare of their country than has been shown in the last two days.” The shame and disappointment Kennedy portrays convinces the public that they deserve more, that they must act. Kennedy concludes, “Some time ago I asked each American to consider what he would do for his country and I asked the steel companies. In the last 24 hours we had their answers.”
I thought that Diane Guerrero who is an American actress speech about her family’s deportation was interesting. She recently appeared on an immigration themed of Chelsea handler’s talk show. Guerrero is the citizen daughter of immigrant parents. Guerrero mentioned how her family was taken away from her when she was just 14 years old. “Not a single person at any level of government took any note of me. No one checked to see if i had a place to live or food to eat, and at 14, i found myself basically on my own”, Guerrero added. Luckily, Guerrero had good friends to help her. She told handler how her family try to become legal but there were no sign or help. Her parents lost their money to scammers who they believed to be a lawyer. When her family’s
On July 22, 1905, social worker and reformer, Florence Kelley, stood in Philadelphia before an audience and presented a speech about the idea of combing the women’s suffrage and child labor issues in order to make more probable advantages in both departments. Her speech was given in away to entice the crowd and motivate them to fix the issues at hand. She was able to effectively able to give her speech by appealing to the crowds emotions and by using ironic diction and syntax to engage the crowd into the words she was saying and backing them up with substantial evidence.
The article, “Why We Still Need Feminism”, written by Casey Cavanaugh (2014), describes how women are treated and why feminism is looked at in such a negative light. She focuses on how the feminism movement doesn’t only concentrate on women and what concerns them, she also talks about how the movement can positively impact all humans. Cavanaugh explains how the treatment of women can go on for generations and how many women are simply dealing with the ill-treatment (Cavanaugh, 2014). The writer gives a few examples of how women are treated and the different ways that it can be changed for the better.
Angela Davis, a renowned political and civil rights activist, was invited in 2012 to Pitzer College to give the commencement speech to the graduating class. Her speech touched on important points in her life as well as many of the values she fought for and believe in. I have never heard her speak before watching this commencement address, and my initial thoughts when hearing her speech was that she was old. Her speech was slow and at first a little boring. However, as her commencement continued onward, she started to get more into rhythm and while she stayed relatively slow, the power behind her words as she spoke made me want to listen more to what she had to say. Angela Davis has had an interesting history as an activist and educator, and
Hillary Rodham Clinton is a well-recognized woman in the United States. Her great contribution as Secretary of State impacted people’s lives. One of many remarkable speeches Clinton gave was the “The Women Rights Speech” on the 4th World Conference on Women Plenary Session, where she used strong words and emotions to appeal the audience. Even though the speech talked about women rights, she wanted everyone including men and children to listen and take action. Her use of ethos, logos and pathos throughout the speech helped people understand women live in a world where they suffer discrimination, and she proposes solutions to solve the issue.
The case of Nancy Cruzan has become one of the landmark cases for withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration because of important ethical issues the case brings to light. At the time of the case, the United States Supreme Court had already established the right of an individual to refuse medical treatment. This issue therefore is not novel to the Cruzan case. Furthermore, there was not any controversy over who was the appropriate decision maker for Nancy Cruzan. The significant issue that the Cruzan case did bring to the table of medical ethics regarded whether or not a substituted decision make could choose to withdraw artificial hydration and nutrition on behalf of another individual.
Good morning ladies and gentlemen! We are gathered here for the grand opening of Moses Academy, an all-boys training camp for, not the military, but for a positive reform onto our society and nation. Not only are we introducing a reform towards the personality of our young men, but we’re here to honor THE Harriet Tubman. I’m referring to that same Harriet Tubman that conquered all the odds just to help slaves, to whom she was connected by faith, connected by blood in an indirect way, connected by the color of their skin, connected by the harsh reality of today. I’m talking about THE Harriet Tubman that, despite being “free”, she took the initiative to help those who weren’t. Despite being “free”, she motivated the ones who couldn’t handle
Life. Life is what gives you the ability to think, to speak, to breath and to be a part of this world. It is worth more than any amount of money, your life is priceless. Without it, we would seize to exist; our world would be utter darkness. Honourable Judge, Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, today Mary Maloney stands on trial before you. A woman who took the away the life of not just an innocent citizen, but her very own husband. She was thought to be an ordinary women, a typical housewife and a soon to be loving mother. However, the facts presented before you today conclude that Mary Maloney was not just an unordinary detective’s wife, but also a murder. On April 13th 1953, the life of Patrick Maloney came to a tragic end because of leg of lamb in the hands of Mary Maloney. For the following reasons, Mary Maloney, wife of the deceased, is guilty of 1st degree murder.
The Supreme Court has the highest authority in this country and throughout its existence the diversity of people in it had been lacking. On May 29, 2009 a new Supreme Court Justice was nominated, she was the first Latina to be appointed to this position and eventually was confirmed by the senate. Sonia Sotomayor’s nomination speech was a moment that brought joy to many Latinos who often did not feel represented in higher positions of authority in this country. She was the first to break the norm for this and in the speech she delivered to the country via new stations she was able to present to the country what qualified her as a Supreme Court Justice. Former President Barack Obama presented Sotomayor as a person
Few people are fearless speakers. As students, we generally feel the rumble of butterflies in our stomachs, but the most we have to lose is a good grade.
From the first to the ninth paragraph, she uses real laws that have been passed in the time around of the convention. The use of these events make the problem more relevant, than if the laws quotes were in place for a long time before the convention. Her change of tone in the speech gives her words more power. At first the tone is sympathetic, tugging on the heartstrings of the attendees, then she twist the knife with her accusatory tone in lines 66-79, and finally she offers redemption in the last three paragraphs. Finally, Kelley petitions that it's only logical to join forces with “workingmen voters” in the last paragraph, something that most of the women there would oppose. As stated before the audience is a group of feminist, most of which feel oppressed by their lack of right. Why would they invite the agents of evil into their holy sanctum? She qualifies her argument by mentioning enlisting the help of labor unions, that were mostly run by men. She gives them another reason, the entire point of her speech, children need to be free from the chains of maltreatment. The steady strengthening of her voice comes to a crescendo at the end, when the last punctuation is an exclamation
I think that the main idea is that colored women should be given the same rights that the colored men were getting. "I want women to have their rights. In the courts women have no right, no voice; nobody speaks for them. I wish woman to have her voice there among the pettifoggers. If it is not a fit place for women, it is unfit for men to be there."
According to Steve Gorman of Thomson Reuters, the world’s largest international multimedia news agency, 40 consumers, and businesses filed legal claims against Toyota. The claims involved financial losses including diminished vehicle principles steaming from complaints of Toyota cars racing out of manage (Gorman, S. 2010). An international company memo cited that a reliable (brake override) option in 2007, three years prior to the safety feature made standard.