Mark Haddon's View Of The Absurd

436 Words1 Page

The central message which Haddon sends regarding people who view the world differently is that thought they may lack certain qualities which we take for granted, they should not be looked down upon due to their worldview being the same as ours, only that the number of people Christopher sees as “different” is much larger. Christopher views the world with a somewhat limited perspective and was not born with the ability understand why people do certain things or why qualities are expected from him. Due to his different worldview, he notices that some things he views as normal is considered absurd to others. An example being his hatred for the colours yellow and brown:“Yellow [because] 1. Custard 2. Bananas...Brown [because] 1. Dirt 2. Gravy.”(84) …show more content…

I kept the piece of paper in my pocket and took it out when I didn’t understand what [someone’s face] is saying”(3). He is unable to distinguish and recognize the emotions of others, causing barriers in his social life. However, Christopher’s confusion regarding such simple thing like facial expressions, provokes readers to consider the absurd concept of reading one’s face. While recognizing emotions is simple for us, some people tend to overthink what others are truly intending due to this skill, which results in the same way as Christopher's inability to do so. Though he faces various challenges, Christopher also has many skills which are unreachable to others, one of which reveals when he writes, “My memory is like a film...because my memory has a smelltrack which is like a soundtrack. And when people ask me to remember something I can simply press Rewind and Fast Forward and Pause”(76). The behaviour of people on the spectrum is often difficult for the non-autistic population to understand. However, Haddon writes the novel rid of our ignorance to these people by using the story as a tool to comprehend his worldview and question the norms of society. Christopher’s narration allows us to acknowledge that the concept of normality should not be a set standard nor a irrefutable fact, but based on each

Open Document