Marginalization Of Powerful Women In Magazines

890 Words2 Pages

Hillary Clinton’s loss in the recent presidential election caused many to consider how a woman with her experience, credentials, and popularity could lose to a candidate who appeared to have none of these qualities. Discussion centered around the difficulty of a woman obtaining significant power in a world dominated by men. This power dynamic is perpetuated, either intentionally or unintentionally, by the media. In the past decade, much research and debate has been done regarding women in magazines, the focus being their sexualizstion and objectification. Amy R. Malkin, Kimberlie Wornian, and Joan C. Chrisler analyzed gendered content related to body image in popular men’s and women’s magazines in their article, “Women and Weight: Gendered …show more content…

Powerful women are marginalized in magazines when they are sexualized or reduced to their physical appearance, portrayed in a stereotypical manner that fails to recognize their ability and value, or left out altogether. Magazines that sexualize women marginalize them by reducing them to their physical appearance, devaluing their skills and expertise. Stereotypical coverage marginalizes powerful women by enforcing traditional gender roles, which prevents women from obtaining significant power over men. The lack of representation of powerful women in magazines marginalizes them by deeming them unworthy of media attention and ensuring that they remain unrecognized by society as a whole. The marginalization of powerful women in magazines is illustrated primarily by the portrayal of First Ladies and female …show more content…

First Ladies of the United States often appear in an abundance of magazine headlines and are featured through various articles and pictures. They have been presented in Vogue, Time Magazine, Vanity Fair, LIFE, and even Men’s Health. In fact, in 2015, the editors of Men’s Health magazine published an article entitled, “The Hottest First Ladies: Behind every great Prez is a smokin’ hot spouse,” which ranks “15 fine First Ladies,” each one with a picture and degrading caption. Nancy Reagan, Hillary Clinton, Michelle Obama, and even Martha Washington are among the ranks. The introduction begins with the line, “First Lady of the United States carries no salary, only expectations: be warm, be social, be civic-minded, take care of the kids, don’t be crazy.” This statement, which explains the expectations of a First Lady in the eyes of the male editors of Men’s Health, serves as an example of the way in which powerful women are marginalized through magazines. In addition to outlining the roles of a First Lady, the article claims that the President of the United States, “... deserve(s) to end the day with a smart, supporting partner, and a fine piece of ass, too.” This depicts the way in which First Ladies have been valued in the media primarily based on their physical appearance, even if, like Michelle Obama, they have an extremely advanced level of education and

Open Document