Manipulation In 1984

898 Words2 Pages

As a result, the motivations for not telling the objective truth in The Things They Carried is starkly different than in 1984. The characters in 1984 endorse manipulation for the sole purpose of obtaining and maintaining power. They do not care for the welfare of others and they do not encourage any form of free thought of skepticism, instead expecting full public acceptance of their embellishments. Furthermore, they are looking to use this manipulation in order to exploit and control the public. In Tim O’Brien’s novel however, the characters employ overstatements in order to either regain a part of themselves that they lost as a direct result of being in a powerless position or in order to help others empathize with them. They are looking …show more content…

O’Brien and the Inner Party in 1984 have control over the entire populace. They wield an incredible amount of power over the population. Therefore, with each manipulation, they have the ability to influence thousands, if not millions. This ability to command the public and its opinion places them at the top of the food chain with the ability to dominate all below. Furthermore, they are insensitive to the desires and necessities of all below them, yet the Inner Party knows that those below them rely on them for instruction, governance, and basic necessity. Thus, Big Brother and his Inner Party are in the perfect position to shamelessly …show more content…

Though the newspapers in America are non-governmental while the Inner Party in 1984 is a part of the government, both have the power of influence the populace and its opinion through media. Joseph Pulitzer and William Randolph Hearst, American media moguls, both employed tactics of yellow journalism in order to boost their growth in their companies. Yellow journalism, according to US Department of State, is a style of journalism that prizes “sensationalism over facts”. As a result, Hearst and Pulitzer used their power of influence to sway public opinion. Most notably, using methods of yellow journalism, they convinced Americans that The Maine had been attacked by the Spanish. As shown in the newspaper headline attached on the last page, Pulitzer chose to highlight the weapons used and suggests that the explosion was not an accident, which, incidentally, it was. Additionally, Hearst and Pulitzer both also published articles priming Americans to take on an anti-Spanish sentiment. The two, when combined, played a decisive role in catalyzing the Spanish-American War. In a similar respect as in 1984, the people with influence over the media created a distinct enemy and united the public against that enemy. Both the Party in 1984 and media tycoons during the heydey of yellow journalism exploited the public’s lack of

Open Document