Maggie Koerth-Baker Conspiracy Theory

668 Words2 Pages

When it comes to conspiracy theories there is a wide variety of them, but few people try to explain their appeal as thoroughly as the author Maggie Koerth-Baker through her article “Why Rational People Buy into Conspiracy Theories.” The author’s paper starts by talking about the incident at the Boston Marathon and how, even though one of the brothers had been arrested, there were still theories being created in order to explain the possible events and motives behind the attack. It is explained that the best way to determine someone’s belief in a theory is if they believe in other theories due to the fact that a conspiracy theory isn’t so much a response to a single event as it is an expression of an overarching worldview (Koerth-Baker 343). …show more content…

This section was given in order to show why conspiracy theories are appealing to the average person and how anybody can create one. Next, research data on the general personality and mental state of conspiracy theorists was introduced with believers being more likely to be cynical and have low self-worth (Koerth-Baker 343). Afterward a brief explanation is given on the amygdala, a part of the brain which activates after fear is felt, and how it is crucial to the creation of the various theories we have today. There has also been research showing a correlation between theorizing and strong support of democratic principles due to the fact that conspiracy theories wouldn’t exist without real conspiracies coming to light (Koerth-Baker 344). Then, Koerth begins to talk about how an abundance of available knowledge on the internet has made destroying conspiracy theories even more difficult due to the constant use of confirmation bias. In 2006 scientists discovered an event called the “backfire effect” where any attempts to debunk a theory makes it more popular to the people, but the effect seems more noticeable when it supports a worldview or ideology (Koerth-Baker …show more content…

Though, in hindsight, this isn’t quite so surprising since someone has to be skeptical about a topic in order for a theory to be created in the first place. These results probably won’t result in a massive movement but they do show how skeptical the average American is of the world around them and the paranoia that’s lying underneath the surface. The general population would have no need for conspiracy theories if real conspiracies, such as Watergate, hadn’t show how vulnerable their private lives were along with how unreliable the government could be. Koerth-Baker and I have no ill-will towards the government, but, in the end, these wild accusations would not exist if true events that could undermine the trust of the people hadn’t been revealed to the

Open Document