Madres De Plaza De Mayo

1352 Words3 Pages

As the system of human rights expanded, new generations of rights were established. The first rights, first and second-generation rights, focused on political, economic and cultural rights, while the third generation of rights focused on collectivist rights, such as women’s or indigenous rights. One example of a third generation rights group, CEDAW, a UN convention, focuses on protecting women from violence through defining rights and collecting reports from countries involved. By generating reports, CEDAW collects information on violence against women in particular areas and discusses solutions reduce it. States adhere to these standards because of pressure from other states or shaming from NGOs, without much consequence for violations, much …show more content…

In the 1970s, as many as 30,000 Argentines disappeared, leaving families of the disappeared desperate for answers (Bosco, 2004). Mothers of the disappeared formed the Madres de Plaza de Mayo in 1977 to seek the truth about the whereabouts of their loved ones. To make their story known, the Madres marched through plazas, using public witnessing and victim testimony, to have their vision of the events known, Witnessing of these marches put the problem of disappearances in Argentina on the international radar and challenged the government in place and their story of events. Even after the removal of government officials involved in the disappearances, the Madres functions as an activist movement still preforming in the public arena today. Within the Madres, two separate groups exist, the Asociación and the Línea Fundadora, which disagree on how the past suffering should be remembered in politics and landscapes and their demonstrations. At first, the Línea Fundadora formed due to disapproval of the centralized structure of the original Madres, the Asociación but more recently, the main conflict is memory (Bosco, …show more content…

Victims desperately tried to seek the truth but disagreed on the best way to find it or remember the past. Within the Madres, the Línea Fundadora believed in a less confrontational, more global human rights approach in response to uncertainty about the disappeared. On the other hand, the Asociación wanted to keep fighting for social change and not accept the answers provided by the new government. They openly criticized the Línea Fundadora of accepting compensation for their losses from the government, claiming that the Madres formed on the basis of bringing their children back alive, something still has not done (Bosco, 2004). In this way, the Asociación resent the governments use of victims as a fulcrum, where initially violence brings political consent and then the new government attempts to heal suffering for political consent to a new government. The Asociación take a more radical approach, in a way mistrusting the new government at hand as well. Additionally, the two Madres groups differ on their view of landscapes of memory. The Línea Fundadora push for areas of human rights violations to become memorials to the past, while the Asociación oppose preservation of these

Open Document