Macbeth Tragic Flaw Analysis

1293 Words3 Pages

Macbeth is among the best examples of a tragic hero to exist in classic literature. Like any other protagonist of an epic, he is a courageous and powerful leader. However, he has one tragic flaw (his ambition) that slowly destroys his life before ending it, effectively bringing about his downfall. Macbeth 's tragic flaw is brought to the surface when he learns of his potential future position as king, and from there it takes control of his actions and judgement. By examining Macbeth 's attitude towards murder throughout the piece, one can trace the different stages of his moral degeneration as he appears to think less and less of the consequences of his actions. Macbeth is introduced much like any other heroic character that protagonizes a …show more content…

He is relieved when he learns that he is invulnerable to any man born of woman, and that he cannot be harmed until a well-known forest travels to the city to confront him. Even though Macbeth is confident that he has no more to fear, he decides to have Macduff killed as an unnecessary extra precaution: "MACBETH: Then live, Macduff. What need I fear of thee? / But yet I’ll make assurance double sure, / And take a bond of fate. Thou shalt not live, / That I may tell pale-hearted fear it lies, / And sleep in spite of thunder" (Shakespeare 85-89). Macbeth expresses that even though he has no more to fear from Macbeth, he will sleep easier at night knowing that the man is dead, and thus vows to kill the man without second thought. At this point, Macbeth reached the nadir of his moral judgment. He has progressed from hesitating and agonizing over the decision to kill a king for his crown to deciding to have a subject killed without a justifiable cause, proving the moral degeneration he experiences in the piece. Many different interpretations exist on what exactly drove Macbeth to his bad deeds, and Jarold Ramsey provides a new logical perspective on what this sudden changte could be attributed to: an obsessive drive for …show more content…

Ramsey eloquently summarizes his argument in a single sentence: "At the first of the play, Macbeth 's 'manly ' actions in war are not contradictory to a general code of humane-ness or 'kind-ness ' irrespective of gender: but as the play develops, his moral degeneration is dramatized as a perversion of a code of manly virtue, so that by the end he seems to have forfeited nearly all of his clames on the race itself" (Ramsey 285). Ramsey expresses that Macbeth 's manly actions in war as described in the beginning of the play were not sinful or uncharacteristic of a hero, but as the play progresses his character develops into an immoral man who eschews his own ethical values in favor of pursuing manly virtues. This is an interesting perspective, especially considering the fact that Lady Macbeth 's questioning of Macbeth 's "manhood" was the deciding factor in his choice to finally kill King Duncan, which in turn was responsible for the rest of his moral degeneration. This is not a problem unique to Macbeth: Aeneas also suffered much in "The Aeneid" due to his incessant pursuit of honor and glory, and he did not prevail until he learned to let go of these ambitions. The difference lies in the fact that Macbeth never

More about Macbeth Tragic Flaw Analysis

Open Document