Lois Quaide Argumentative Essay

388 Words1 Page

Cell phones are a part of our life. We use our cell phones for everything. Our schedules, homework, music, our daily reminders are in our phones. Our phones are practically our life. Lois Quaide addresses her concern on taking technology into the wilderness. Lois Quaide feels that cell phones, even though they help you in emergencies, should not be allowed in the wilderness. Lois Quaide sees technology almost like a parasite. Society and the wilderness are connecting into one thing and Lois Quaide disagrees with this. Quaide feels that technology should be banned from wilderness and certain public places. I disagree with her argument on this topic because phones do help and are not a bother to other people. I disagree with one of Lois Quaide’s statements “ More often, people receive incoming business and even social calls anywhere at any time, everyone else present can be disturbed by one person’s …show more content…

Chavez’s article Mobile app could save lost hikers and others’ lives. The article was about how a hiker named Harrison Dandrea and his cocker spaniel named DJ went to take a hike at Grandfather Mountain State Park early in the morning. Three of his biggest mistakes were not telling anyone where he was going, not telling anyone when he was going to be back home, and not bringing enough snacks or emergency clothes if an emergency were to occur. He ended up taking a different trial than he usually does, the fog ended up blinding his sight and he got lost. He fortunately had his phone with him but did not have any cell phone reception. He remembered that he had downloaded this app called RapisSOS. He then got connected to a 911 operator who discovered his exact location and sent a park ranger to go and rescue him. This lost hiker and his dog had a happy ending because he had his phone on him and could use it to call for help. This is one example of how technology is not a bother to the wilderness but is a beneficial

Open Document