Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why should we buy local foods
Child labor working conditions
Child labor working conditions
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why should we buy local foods
a. Thesis:
i. The locavore movement is associated with the issues of nutrition, conservation, and economics
II. Reason 1: the locally grown produce’s nutritional value is overall better than unfamiliar produce shipped from foreign countries
a. Locally grown produce is fresher (Source A)
i. Picked within 24 hours of purchase
b. It not only tastes better, but are closer to a maximum of nutrition than store-bought produce (Source D)
c. Store-bought produce still may provide nutrition, local food is better overall
i. Always go for the better quality and worth
III. Reason 2: the locavore movement is saving the world with its conservation of the environment
a. Transportation causes pollution and wastes energy
i. Buying local preserves fossil fuels
ii.
…show more content…
One argument is that locavores threaten the livelihood of small farmers, specifically in Kenya (Source C)
1. However, all local economies could improve if everyone bought local food
2. Kenya is in a malnourished area, so the farmers should sell their produce more locally for better improvements
Question 2
I. Introduction
a. In Florence Kelley’s 1905 speech to the Philadelphia convention of the National American Women Suffrage Association, she accentuates the obligatory need to reform the working conditions for young children.
b. Thesis:
i. Within her powerful and enticing argument, Kelley is repetitive over main concepts, introduces several examples of the horrible conditions and state policies, and praises the virtues of laws restricting the workday.
II. Body
a. Main concepts
i. impels sympathy for those who are victims to the labor policies
1. Example: the dramatic number of “two million children under the age of sixteen years who are earning their bread” to immediately captivate the audience into caring ii. Kelley significantly differentiates from the laws
b. Language and literary devices
i. “pitiful privilege” an oxymoron
1. Scoffing at New Jersey’s laws which make boys and girls work all night
The Golding Sisters lobbied for women’s rights to equal pay and employment. Annie Mackenzie (1855-1934) and Isabella Therese (1864-1940) began their careers teaching in both public and catholic schools (Kingston, 2013). Annie worked with infants and girls and later shifted to teaching at the Asylum for Destitute Children (Kingston, 2013). She was also a member on the State Children Relief Board. Belle left teaching early to pursue a career as the first female government inspector in 1900 (Lemon, 2008). With their sister Kate Dwyer (1861-1949), Labour leader and school teacher, the sister’s began the Womanhood Suffrage League in 1893 and the Woman’s Progressive Foundation in 1901 which aimed to combat the inability for women to work in certain industries and sit on juries (The Sunday Morning Herald, 1933). Belle’s research skills assisted in preparing the sister’s persuasive speeches and statements (Fawkner & Kelly, 1995). In 1921 Kate became a female Justice of Peace (Gallego, 2013). Kate also wrote extensively about politics, industries and women’s questions.
Instead of playing with dolls and ribbons, eight year olds of the early twentieth century were working in factories making them. At this time there was no regulation or policies dictating when or where a young girl could work. In 1905, Florence Kelley delivered a speech advocating for the helpless children being sent to work by their parents. She emphasizes the need for change in the working environment and the underlying need for women sufferage. Kelley presents her argument with an appeal to the emotions, a call to action, and the use of examples in order to encourage the voter to put an end to child labor.
Pelletier ends his perspective on “The Locavore’s Dilemma,” by convincing his audience, especially me, into believing a 100-mile food diet simply will not be viable, because it would cause our current civilization to regress, take a step back. He provides
Kelley uses an anaphora to illustrate the harsh working conditions the laborers deal with. “The children make our shoes…robbed them” (lines 66-77). By description of children having to experience dreadful working all night, and how her audience is allowed to sleep, she creates a feeling of guilt for the children that are forced to work. The anaphora narrates the struggle that the children were experiencing. Right after she uses the anaphora , Kelley explains that the burden of factory work has robbed the children of their school life, using sympathy and guilt to establish that children are suffering in order to persuade Americans to vote for the purpose of modifying laws. Lines 18-22, Kelley emphasizes this, “Tonight while we sleep, several thousand little girls will be working in textile mills, all through the night…..ribbons for us to buy.” she also hints that the lack of sleep young worker receive has a high possibility of causing developmental problems that will affect them for the remainder of their lives. Kelley asks if mothers and teachers voting would make a difference (lines 55-59), she asks this because she implies that their votes can make the intense child labor come to a permanent halt. Her speech serves its purpose and is effective because of her examples she uses and the pathos she establishes by making her audience feel guilty.Kelley applies logos into her
Florence Kelley appeals to the masses that the conscription of unregulated child labor is abhorring through the use of ethos, juxtaposition, and pathos. Kelley’s speech tackles on one of her main goals in life, regulations on child labor. Her speech moved the masses to fight for the rights of children, and she won. Kelley is responsible for the safe working conditions and the child labor laws that the United States has in implementation today.
Compared to company produce that has been picked from the farm a long period before purchase, the fruits and vegetables one finds at a farmer’s market or the local grocery store are fresh (Maiser 3). When one eats locally,one gets the freshest fruits and vegetables available - and with the price of produce, one does not want to buy something that is not
Crisp lettuce. Juicy tomatoes. Grass fed beef. And Two soft, fluffy buns to seal it all together and make it complete. These hand picked, fresh ingredients are all found just around the corner. They’re at your local grocery store, a fruit stand, a farmers market, and so many other wonderful places. They’re all around you and Locavorism helps you embrace them all in one bite.
Local foods have higher nutrient levels compared to store bought foods, because of the freshness. The packaging and long trips that the store bought foods endure, decreases their freshness and nutrient levels. Exposure to artificial lighting, air, and temperature change are other factors that contribute to the decrease in nutrient value of store bought foods. Vitamins C, E, A and B are the main nutrients that are affected by these factors. Although store bought produce still have some nutritional value, local produce are consumed immediately after they are harvested which cannot be compared to store bought produce. For example, strawberry farms are abundant throughout Canada during strawberry season. Most supermarkets carry strawberries as well however, these strawberries are imported from other countries. The imported strawberries freshness cannot be compared to the freshness of a freshly picked strawberry. Local fruits and vegetables are allowed to ripen longer rather than be picked early to be exported. This not only allows for the product to be more healthier, but also tastier
In recent years, with rising concerns about sustainability and health, the locavore movement has been gaining steam. Locavores strive to eat only locally-grown and locally-sourced food, often only looking at food within a one-hundred mile radius of their home. They claim that by eating locally, they cut down on transportation emissions and encourage environmental sustainability. However, this local model is not as sharp as it seems. The locavore movement is a flawed way to approach sustainability, as it fails to take in the most important factors of sustainability and is largely impractical for huge segments of the population.
Since eating locally grown food is healthier than the food from the supermarket,we should start a locavore movement.Eating local food is one way to become healthier persons r,since food purchased locally is fresher and the most important it have a higher nutritional content (Source A).Also,the government recognized that consuming local food is a essential by deciding to “invest in the health and nutrition of the American children..by expanding their access to farmer’s markets”(Source E).Therefore,living a healthy lifestyle means eating the most nutritious food because nutrition is a vital part to benefit our health.On the contrary,,buying local food in supermarkets that had been on the refrigerator for a
Such as: locally grown produce is fresher, local food tastes better, eating local protects from bio-terrorism, and others (source A). These reasons are false for many reasons. Local grown produce is only technically fresh if you eat it right away, though most people just wait a few days to eat food they buy, local food tastes just like other food bought at other stores, and eating local may help with bio-terrorism, but so does everything else someone does to help the environment. Also, probably the biggest reason, local food is not more nutritious than regular food because local farmers use pesticides in their produce which means when you eat their food you’re eating these
Hunting helps cull back animals that are overpopulating local areas or animals are old and need culled out of the herd, but
The impact of an overpopulated species can have a significant, negative impact on whole ecosystems. Overpopulation of a species has been shown to cause declines in the abundance and diversity of all kinds of forest creatures, from insects to mice to canopy-nesting birds(“Hunting Plays”) and destroy the natural habitats of these and other species. An example of overpopulation impact has been seen in areas with an overabundance of deer. Deer eat just about everything farmers grow. Deer eat greens, pumpkins, corn, wheat, cranberries, carrots, avocadoes, and grapes(“Even Small”). They do not discriminate between farmed and natural land, often damaging crops resulting in a loss of revenue for farms. An individual farmer can sustain tens of thousands of dollars’ worth of crop damage in a year and in many states has resulted in annual losses into the tens of millions of dollars(“Even Small”). Farmers in agricultural states encourage hunters to kill as many deer as possible. In some states, farmers are issued special permits to kill deer year around to protect their crops(“Even Small”). As deer destroy the crops of farmers, they also destroy food that we eat. Farmers that grow vegetables and fruits for local restaurants have lost thousands of dollars due to deer. Farmers kill deer year around to produce food for grocery stores. Don Waller with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources states "We should have longer hunting seasons and ask hunters to shoot more than one deer”(Levy par 16). Longer hunting seasons and giving farmers the rights to shoot more deer will ensure the restoration of crops and that the deer population will not increase to the point of negatively impacting natural resources, farmed crops and revenue of
Local grown fresh produce is more beneficial to society than fast food or mass produced food. Buying locally will bring a higher quality of life for many generations to come by having a cleaner environment and enhancing the community. Fast food is killing society and causing a plaque of obesity which causes other health problems. Buying local fresh food is a much healthier choice for children and adults alike. Fresh food will also boost the economy through creating jobs and educating the population. Overall, local fresh produce is better for the community than fast or pre-packaged food.
Food has been a common source of necessity in our everyday lives as humans. It helps gives us nutrition and energy to live throughout our life. Over several decades, the development of making foods has evolved. They have changed from natural to processed foods in recent years. Nowadays natural ingredients are barely used in the making of foods like bread, cheese, or yogurt. The food industry today has replaced natural food making with inorganic ingredients. The cause of this switch is due to processed foods being easier, cheaper and faster to make. Artificial nutrition and processed foods have been proven to last longer in market shelves then natural foods. Also, due to artificial additives in processed foods they help satisfy consumers taste more than natural ingredients. The method of producing processed foods is common in today's food industry and helps make money faster and efficiently for companies. Examples of this can be found in all markets that distribute food. Even though processed foods may be easier and faster to make, they are nowhere near as healthy for consumers compared to natural foods. Natural foods are healthier, wholesome, and beneficial to the human body and planet then processed foods.