In Linda J. Waite’s research “Does Marriage Matter?”, she is trying to encourage people demographers to share their knowledge of the benefits of marriage in order to influence the decisions of laypeople and public officials. Therefore, she presents a consolidated account of the major benefits of marriage. Waite proceeds to address the question: Does marriage matter? She provides a number of benefits which married people enjoy over non-married people, beginning with healthy behavior. She points out that married men are much less likely to drink than unmarried men, although she ignores the fact that this difference is mostly due to the high-incidence of drinking problems among divorced men (since widowed men are only slightly more likely to …show more content…
Waite’s research, marriage does lead to a higher life satisfaction from all the benefits it gives to the individuals. Each benefits can be the reason why married people are more satisfied with their lives, may it be physically or mentally. As people are more religious, there is a higher chance that they will get married due to the encouragements from their individual doctrines and this will lead to a higher life satisfaction according to Waite. In the “The Benefits from Marriage and Religion in the United States: A Comparative Analysis” by Linda J. Waite and Evelyn L. Lehrer, they discussed the research about the effects of both religion and marriage on different social aspects and people’s well-being. They also researched the connection of religion and marriage and how both affect one another. Waite and Lehrer presented findings of the association between religious connection and better results on various physical health measures, including problems related to heart disease, stroke, hypertension, cancer, gastrointestinal disease, as well as overall health status and life expectancy. The research also indicates the differences by religious affiliation differs in their effects on physical health, members who are religiously stricter exhibiting an advantage. They showed another research by Hummer that indicates the gap of life expectancy at age 20 between those who attend religious services more than once a week and those who never attend never attend is …show more content…
Recent studies have found that there are differences in parenting styles by religious affiliations. Conservative Protestants tend to place greater prominence on obedience and view corporal punishment as acceptable. However, they are more likely to refrain from yelling at their children and more likely to praise their children. Studies also show that religious families tend to have stronger ties with their family members and has a positive impact on mother and children relationship. Waite and Lehrer further show that religion is a complementary feature within marriage. Religion have an impact on the education and upbringing of children, the allocation of time and money, the cultivation of social relationships, and often even the place of residence. Therefore, there is less conflict and greater productivity if both partners share the same religion.
In Jan Eichhorn’s research “Happiness for believers? Contextualising the effects of religiosity on life-satisfaction”, he discussed the research about the correlation of higher personal religiosity tends to be associated with greater happiness. He started by discussing the studies of happiness and how the perception has
Marriage is the foundation of modern society and has historically been present in most civilizations. Marriage is associated with many positive health outcomes and is encouraged across most racial/ethnic groups. According to Sbarra, Law, and Portley (2011), the social institution of marriage has changed much since the 19th century especially in the way it can be terminated. Married African American or Black men are happier, make more money, are less likely to face poverty, and choose healthier behaviors than their counterparts that are divorced (Bachman, Clayton, Glenn, Malone-Colon, & Roberts, 2005). The converse is true for Black women who seem to be the only sub-group not to achieve the universal health and other benefits gained from marriage (Bachman, et al., 2005). This paradox in marital benefits have many implications including lower martial satisfaction and divorce.
Maggie Gallagher’s article “Why Marriage is Good for You” list some key points as to why marriage could possibly be good for someone. The topic itself is not an easy ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answer. It is a very dynamic topic of discussion that undoubtedly requires a significant amount of evidence to prove why a person feels one way or the other. Gallagher attempts to prove why she thinks marriage is in fact good for people. Some of her points are not as strongly supported as they should be. In order to give such a bold statement, a person a needs to have good evidence to support their argument.
In a 1986 study from the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, factors among those that were considered most important to marital relationship decisions were that their spouse was religious, kind or considerate, artistic/intelligent, and easygoing/adaptable. Religion as a bonding agent in human relationships has taken on a much stricter role that simply a preference in choosing a mate. Religion has not only mandated the laws of marriage within it. It has also mandated laws that do not allow for inter-religion relationships. This type of group selection works to maintain
Parenting methods have been affected by numerous factors over the years. Parenting is something that is obviously successful or in the worst case, has failed miserably! We found that the parents' religious affiliation affects the way they raise their children. "The particular theologies theory posits that different religious affiliations put varying efforts into emphasizing family-formation strategies" (Pearce 2002: 325). Religious affiliations, inspired parents to be fervent on implanting strong morals, maintaining close relational ties within their family, and encourage positive community involvement with their particular religious affiliation.
Marriage is the legal or formally recognized union of a man and a woman, or two people or the same sex as partners in a relationship. Marriage rates in the United States have changed drastically since the last 90’s and early 2000 years (Cherlin 2004). Marital decline perspective and marital resilience perspective are the two primary perspectives and which we believe are the results from the decline. The marital decline perspective is the view that the American culture has become increasingly individualistic and preoccupied with personal happiness (Amato, 2004). The change in attitudes has changed the meaning of marriage as a whole, from a formal institution
According to the authors, research has shown that there is a global connection between spirituality and religion and health. The global connection involved how often a person attended church and denomination affiliation, which both provide a prediction of health-related outcomes. Further, the authors reference a meta-analysis of religious involvement and mortality that shows that 126,000 participants who scored high on the religious indices had a 29% higher odd of survival. This analysis also indicated that the involvement needed to only be basic and
Once upon a time marriage was a requirement of society and a value to many women who wanted a stable life. It stand as a commitment to their husband and to God. It remain a way to start a proper family in the eyes the Lord. It was what many mothers and daughters dreamed of. Now that, many generations have passed many people believe marriage is not valued and Divorce rates are higher than ever. Religion has also become optional and there’re many different religions to choose from. Cohabitation has also reigned over society one doesn’t need to wait till marriage. Now you are able to move in with the person you love at any point in life. Marriage had started as a first option to many but it has become the last. There are still reasons why marriage
Is marriage really important? There is a lot of controversy over marriage and whether it is eminent. Some people believe it is and some people believe it is not. These opposing opinions cause this controversy. “On Not Saying ‘I do’” by Dorian Solot explains that marriage is not needed to sustain a relationship or a necessity to keep it healthy and happy. Solot believes that when a couple gets married things change. In “For Better, For Worse”, Stephanie Coontz expresses that marriage is not what is traditional in society because it has changed and is no longer considered as a dictator for people’s lives. The differences between these two essays are the author’s writing style and ideas.
According to Clarkberg, Stolzenberg and Waite, from the University of Chicago, cohabitation is preferred over marriage by a specific group of people defined through their preferences in certain attitudes and values. According to this study, people chose to enter into either marriage or cohabitation depending on their views on procreation and relationships. However, the article also includes a study of peoples choice relying on views towards leisure time allotment, household labor division, employment, economic resources and relationships with immediate and extended family as well as with religion.
Stearns, Peter N. “The History of Happiness. (Cover Story).” Harvard Business Review 90.1/2 (2012): 104-109. Business Source Complete. Web. 6 June 2015.
Inside the article “Why Marriage is Good for You”, Maggie Gallagher makes claims that marriage improves many facets of an individual’s life; including both mental and physical health, longevity, finances, and reduced chances of infidelity (Gallagher). The statements made throughout the article reference many statistics and studies conducted by various organizations and individuals, however, Gallagher falls victim to a number of common logical fallacies. While this weakens Gallagher’s argument in the article, it does not necessarily make it false.
Therefore, being married is more beneficial than staying single because a married person lives longer and healthier. In sum, being married does not mean of losing freedom but means having another person to share one’s life with. Social relationship helps marrieds to earn more money and live happier and healthier lives. I believe that marriage is comparative needed.
Marriage is termed as a legitimate commitment or social establishment which unites two people mutually as husband and wife. The agreement ascertains privileges and responsibilities amid spouses, spouses and children and spouses and in-laws. Marriage is deemed to be a momentous union in every society. It is significant in terms of providing security, emotional support and fulfilling economic, social, cultural and physical needs. These needs are the natural cravings of young adults that drive them towards matrimony. It is a foundation that is based on personal responsibilities which form the backbone of civilizations.
The debate on whether to get married or stay single has been raging for a long while, with both sides of the coin having their own pros and cons regarding the matter. Many proponents of either marriage or single life have strong individual convictions, and it is difficult to reach a definitive objective conclusion. Is the married individual happier than his/her single counterpart, or is getting married just a comfort seeking ritual that people believe they have to fulfill at some point in their lives? It is necessary to dissect this issue in the light of four factors: health and other medical factors, the economic and finance front, mental and emotional wellbeing and lastly, the social factor.
Society is constantly developing to accept and support other life choices aside from the mandatory marriage of a man and a woman seen in the twentieth century. There are several underlying causes of this and they may seem that the modern world is traveling the wrong road but in fact, they are not. Decline in religion, change in women’s role, and the terms of what make a family transforming are societal improvements in disguise. Even though less are getting married or marry late, the hidden causes of this trend is a positive change in humanity. In today’s world, marriage is not a stage of life but an option from many other choices and this has allowed the general public to embrace the diversity and the array of differences in marriage as well as the course of action others choose to take.