Lincoln Center Argumentative Analysis

868 Words2 Pages

The value proposition for the Lincoln Center for Education, according to their website, is listed as “The arts cultivate a unique skill set that is indispensable for the 21st century: problem solving, collaboration, communication, imagination, and creativity….” In the spring semester of 2016, I was afforded with the opportunity to go and participate in a workshop at the Lincoln Center. The workshop, which was split into 2 different sections, challenged everyone present to be able to examine one another’s perspective, while engaging in meaningful discourse. While the experience itself was a great artistic experience, the experience itself was able to bring into question how filler words can be purposefully used as a form of artistic expression, …show more content…

Individuals hold polar views on whether or not filler words are appropriate to use. In fact, the article Um . . . Who Like Says You Know: Filler Word Use as a Function of Age, Gender, and Personality states that “One widely used but often overlooked feature of language are filler words, which are speech irregularities used in spoken conversation and commonly regarded as superfluous language spoken by careless speakers ...” (Laserna, 329). During the first section of the workshop, participants were asked to use their imaginations and creativity to create sculptures with clay. Next, the participants engaged in a gallery walk, where they critiqued the sculptures that were created. Participants were asked to leave notes on whichever sculptures they liked the best. A conversation ensued, and all the participants were asked to examine and discuss each other’s perspectives. While engaging in conversation, the participants used filler words numerous amounts of times to express their various perspectives. The participant’s use of filler words during the workshop did not serve as a superfluous language spoken by careless speakers, rather it served to help them express their artistic perspectives in an engaging and meaningful …show more content…

Two of the five positive outcomes that were discussed in this article were sense making and entertainment. In the outcome of sense making, visual art is viewed as a way of trying to interpret and decode what is in front of us. In the outcome of entertainment, visual art is seen as “the pleasure or interest through appreciating or expressing art” (Lomas, 173). During the educational experience, we were trying to make sense of the sculptures that we analyzing and had a sincere desire engage in conversations with one another. As students were analyzing the art, they were able to engage in meaningful discussions with one another. As these shared art experiences were taking place, students were able to simultaneously show there engagement and thought processes through the usage of filler words. Ironically, while filler words can have a negative connotation attached to individuals that use them, in this particular case, the usage of filler words served as a facilitator of communication in artistic expression, rather than a superfluous language spoken by carless

Open Document