Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Legal issues in nursing and health care quizlet
Legal issues in nursing and health care quizlet
Legal issues in nursing and health care quizlet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Legal issues in nursing and health care quizlet
In the case of Michael T. Vandall, M.D., Plaintiff and Appellant v. Trinity Hospitals, a corporation, and Margaret C. Nordell, M.D., the issue is about retaliatory discharge. It deals with problems with Trinity Hospital in North Dakota, Dr. Margaret Nordell and Dr. Michael Vandall, both physicians working in the OB-GYN department. Dr. Vandall was hired in 1996 by Trinity Hospital under the Physician Services Agreement. The Physicians Services Act, or PSA is a contract that establishes terms of engagement, such as responsibilities, scheduling, salary and insurance. PSAs are a form of alignment between hospitals and physicians that falls just short of full employment. Hospital contracts physicians for certain, outlined professional services, and the hospital directly employs the group staff and takes care of the administrative costs (Herman, 2012). While working at the OB-GYN department in the hospital, Dr. Vandall, as a Vice Chair of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, learned that another employee of the hospital, Dr. Margaret Nordell was engaged in a level of treatment that was unethical and violated accepted standards of care. It was his duty to the hospital and to the patients, to monitor the competence of his staff members. Although he tried to take the proper steps to deal with it within the hospital, he ended up reporting this to the North Dakota Board of Medical Examiners. It was concluded by the Board that the treatment of Dr. Nordell was gross negligence and they suspended her license to practice medicine. Dr. Vandall did what the law required him to do when he learned what was going on. After that, Dr. Nordell began filing many complaints against Dr. Vandall, stating that he was "looking at her patient's... ... middle of paper ... ...s concern for the patients. There was no danger to his life, no person was getting threatened in front of him or property being destroyed, as what happened in the staged films, but I'm certain he was aware of the legal proceedings that would occur. He still went through with his decision to do the right thing. Dr. Vandall was living up to his ethical duties by reporting the actions of Dr. Nordell and followed thorough with his rights to protect himself when dealing with the hospital. Sometimes the simplest and best intentions end up turning into complicated matters, but that is a risk we need to take. When it comes to legal proceedings, it is best to know as much as possible in order to have a favorable outcome. I believe that starts with doing the right thing in the first place. But if that isn't possible, make sure you know your resources to get the help you need.
Recommendations: It is recommended that our law office regretfully deny service to Ms. Carry based upon the precedent in Kentucky. Based upon the analysis the issue, it is apparent that Ms. Carry would not receive a promising conclusion to her situation. Due to the facts involved and the cases discussed (which are somewhat on point) Ms. Carry does not make a claim in which relief can be granted.
Ohio Dep’t of Rehabilitation & Correction are the poor-quality patient care that Tomcik received and Tomcik’s health being at risk. Once engaged in a doctor-patient relationship, physicians are obligated to provide the best possible care for the patient by utilizing their skills and knowledge as expected from a competent physician under the same or similar conditions (“What Is a Doctor’s Duty of Care?” n.d.). However, in Tomcik’s situation, Dr. Evans did not deliver high-quality care, for he administered a perfunctory breast examination and thus did not follow standard protocols. There is evidence of indifference conveyed by Dr. Evans, and the lack of proper care towards Tomcik is an issue that can be scrutinized and judged appropriately. Additionally, Tomcik’s health was at risk due to the failure of a proper physical evaluation and the incredibly long delay in diagnosis and treatment. The negligence from Dr. Evans, along with the lack of medical attention sought out by Tomcik after she had first discovered the lump in her breast, may contribute to Tomcik’s life being in danger as well as the emotional anguish she may have felt during that time period. Overall, the incident of Tomcik’s expectations from the original physician and other employees at the institution not being met is an ethical issue that should be dealt with
The receptionist was on the phone for quite a long time before she could reach out to Ms. Patient. In the end, the receptionist just took Ms. Patient’s insurance without any clarification and made her wait for a while. Additionally, she was unable to focus on Ms. Patient and got distracted when another patient asked for indications. The receptionist clearly indicated unprofessionalism when she was unable to provide adequate information for the patient when she was disoriented. Also, the receptionist did not have any manners when she failed to excuse herself when another patient wanted to speak with her. Ms. Patient stated that she felt extremely vulnerable and lost when no one was able to help her understand what was going on. Therefore, the healthcare team in this case was unsuccessful in providing a caring and helpful environment for the
As far as the scope of practice, the hospital and the physicians should have had a designated a chain of command within the medical team. The chain of command helps to ensure that the nurse knows who to notify about any concerns or questions regarding a patient, to prevent the nurse from making decisions that she is not qualified to make. in this case ignoring and overlooking Ms. Rodriguez’s condition, was a decision that the nurse and other staff made on their own, without being qualified to do so. There were several people who failed to practice within their respective guidelines and played a part in the tragic and needless death of Ms.
retaining any physician who had at any time treated any plaintiff in the pelvic mesh
The PCP also notified the Clinic Board and Administration about Sally’s threat to sue the clinic for releasing her information without prior consent. The Clinic Board and Administration conducted an internal investigation which reveal several ethical and legal standards were violated.
The effect of this decision will protect society and other people like John will learn about consequences. Other psychologists will also learn from Dr. Romaro for good ethical examples. As a Psychologist Dr. Romero requires to have good ethical judgement. His job is very important and his decision affect him in the long run. This was a very sensitive time I his life and there were times when his report could have been bias. Dr. Romaro chose to prolong the timing of his report in other to request older result. Although they were not helpful due to timeline. Dr. Romaro was trying to be fair and accurate regarding his results. As a future Psychologist I feel like this Dr. was trying his best to make sure that his results were accurately fair so that he could have the appropriate diagnosis for john until his confession. Although this confession was not in john’s advantage, then the Dr. could really see john for who he was. And also he john was really sick and hallucinated and confused the Dr. would also be able to help. “The boy waiting for the bus
88).The film inspects Dr. Peeno’s realization of this concept in her first position was at Humana, an HMO, as a medical reviewer. HMOs such as Humana are based off of bureaucratic principles that take the personal perspective out of business (p. 36). As seen in Damaged Care, the structure was based off of a hierarchy that employed and enforced impersonal rules and principles of the organization (p. 36). When Dr. Peeno began her career at Humana, the organizational structure was explained to her very clearly; the nurses reported to the utilization review manager who reported to the medical reviewers who reported to Dr. Scarwood, the head of Medical Services. Avery Principle, one of the medical reviewers, explained to Dr. Peeno that the main objective at Humana was to get the physicians to refrain from ordering unnecessary procedures, which wasted funds. This explanation supported the interviewer, Mr. Gulson’s question to Dr. Peeno, when he asked her if she was good at saying no. Due to Dr. Peeno’s earlier experiences in medical school with her instructor ordering an unnecessary gall bladder surgery, she stated she could do definitely say no, for it was the right thing to do. Dr. Peeno did not realize that for the organization, saying no was a means of survival and safety for Humana, for it allowed Humana to save money and out of the
In what is known as the largest malpractice case in Maryland is the case of Enso Martinez and Rebecca Fielding against John Hopkins Hospital. In this situation, Ms. Fielding was taken to the hospital for an emergency caesarean section. Grant...
The nurses have rarely seen this behavior and Nurse Ratched usually handles these situations appropriately. That day she didn’t and every one was surprised. Everyone’s defense to Nurse Ratched has been questioned. Because of one man that carries himself as if he wasn’t a mentally ill. Everyone has a defense against her but never thought of acting themselves instead of routinely. Even the nurses have nothing to say because all their defenses have been questioned.
The Lewis Blackman Case: Ethics, Law, and Implications for the Future Medical errors in decision making that result in harm or death are tragic and costly to the families affected. There are also negative impacts to the medical providers and the associated institutions (Wu, 2000). Patient safety is a cornerstone of higher-quality health care and nurses serve as a communication link in all settings which is critical in surveillance and coordination to reduce adverse outcomes (Mitchell, 2008). The Lewis Blackman Case 1 of 1 point accrued
She controlled every movement and every person’s actions and thoughts. She made the doctors so miserable when they did not follow her instructions, that they begged to be transferred out if. “I'm disappointed in you. Even if one hadn't read his history all one should need to do is pay attention to his behavior on the ward to realize how absurd the suggestion is. This man is not only very very sick, but I believe he is definitely a Potential Assaultive” (). This quote from the book illustrated how Nurse Ratched controlled her ward. She manipulated people into siding with her regardless of whether it was the right decision. This was malpractice by Nurse Ratched because she did not allow the doctor, who was trained to diagnose patients, to do his job properly. Instead, she manipulated the doctor to diagnose the patients incorrectly in order to benefit her interests rather than those of the
In addition, Guardiola claims that the improperly billed claims were caused by “inadequate clinical documentation to support inpatient claims, internal processes designed to improperly assign inpatient admission status, antiquated computer systems that generated false claims, and a lack of review to ensure appropriate inpatient status assignments” (Guardiola v. Renown Health, 2014). It is noted that the plaintiff Guardiola discovered the alleged insufficiencies and claimed she brought it to the attention of management, but Renown takes no action to correct the problem and did nothing to prevent it from happening. The plaintiff claims that management at Renown directed, encouraged and facilitated the deceitful action to be continued against
This article includes recently released information about an incident that has been completely settled. The article states that a nurse practitioner, Martha C. Smith-Lightfoot, took a spreadsheet from University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC) that contained around the information of around 3,000 patients. She had previously worked at URMC, but she had switched jobs to work at Greater Rochester Neurology. When she left URMC, she took the spreadsheet with her without their URMC’s consent.
Jung, P., Lurie, P & Wolfe, S. (2006) U. S Physicians Disciplined for Criminal Activity, Journal of Law-Medicine, 16(355).