The focus of this part of essay is on leadership style and its detailed characteristics. Leadership style is defined as the behavior of leaders focusing on what leaders do and how they act. Human basic beliefs and assumptions about their natural working habits define our leadership style. In life, the leader may be chosen by the organization, the entrepreneur or a group of people believing in his leadership. It is determined by: innate qualities, situation (peace - war), nature of the task and characteristics of the group (the nature of the group, positions in the group).
There are many different leadership styles that can be exhibited by leaders in the political, business or other field. According to XX century research about leadership styles, conducted by psychologists Lewin, Lippitt and White, we distinguish 3 of them: authoritarian, democratic and laissez-faire. Psychologists conducted a study whose purpose was to determine which style has the maximum impact on the efficiency of work, the level of job satisfaction and intercompany relationships. As for efficiency, autocratically led group achieved the best results in terms of the amount of work, but the quality was higher in groups led democratically. The autocratic style, there were signs of growing aggression, which sometimes were directed against the weakest or new members of the group (the scapegoat syndrome). On the other hand the groups targeted liberally often occurred to the spontaneous emergence of informal leaders who was starting with the autocratic leadership management style. Lewin, Lippitt and White claimed that the leader adopting the specific procedure of approach is able to produce a specific group climate and leadership style.
3.1 Authoritarian Leadership
...
... middle of paper ...
...and by the mere fact of taking leadership positions. About the leadership decided cohesion, flexibility and the ability to build adequate contact with subordinates, as a result of which we will be able to manage them effectively. Employees want to follow the leader, paying attention to his comments because then they are motivated to work more efficiently and effectively. However it should be remembered that whether the manager is considered to be a leader depends mainly on his skills, understanding of others and also the specific way of issuing commands. A good leader puts requirements and shows a consequence in pursuing the objective. Moreover he must show his human nature when he is gentle and cheerful to people form the group. Good leader must be able to listen and understand them, showing that their opinion is just as important as other issues in the company.
Leaders are actively on targeting goals and objectives for the people who work for them. In management, many goals are established by staffs and carried out by the managers themselves. Leaders will act to develop in more creative ways solve the problems; keep on going and with new missions. Managers will continue to do whatever is necessary work to accomplish the tasks and usually to get the job done without taking on too much risk or moving forward. The leader's instinct is to take risks instead and to challenge that task holding back by people and think of new ideas within an organization. Leaders more concerned on relationship between staffs, they promote the good staff, help them to develop, and move forward. Managers assign people, focus on personnel issues; and focus on how the job task get done, how they solve it, and how are they finished. (Rashid A., A., 2007).
This paper has summarized some prominent studies about leadership styles. Before understanding the styles which I may choose to practice, extensive studies on various leadership theories and approaches have been carried out. After conducting this research paper, I believe that there is no one-size-fits-all style for leadership. Lewin’s Model and Belbin’s Team Role Model have extended my knowledge and they have encouraged me to learn to assume different roles or styles in different possible situations. Therefore, I can get acquainted more easily to carrying out teamwork in my future job.
Many definitions exist on what leadership is. Despite the many differences in definitions, they all describe the leader as someone who influences others. Leaders transform individuals around them allowing them to work to their full potential. In order for a leader to be successful they must be knowledgeable, self- confident, and effective communicators. These characteristics will create a positive workplace environment that results in an increase in productivity. Leadership is not defined by titles or salary. Leaders must acquire their skills and continue to improve on them through learning. Good leaders provide a vision and help motivate others to make that vision happen. The leader must be effective and successful in creating a strong institution.
Leadership is a quality which cannot be acquired by any person from the other but it can be acquired by self-determination of a person. Leadership can best be called the personality of the very highest ability-whether in ruling, thinking, imagining, innovation, warring, or religious influencing. Leadership is practiced not so much in words a it is in attitude and in actions. Their actions leave a long lasting memory in the line of history and lead up to may events that occur today. To be a leader one will need many qualities. Leaders have a purpose and strategies to accomplish that purpose. They are driven and motivated. In the end they should be able to attain good results. These innate talents help to make up a leader that will succeed and be efficient in carrying out tasks. But, the purpose of this paper is determine what truly makes a leader successful. A successful leader should be considered more on their impact rather than their accomplishments of their organizations alone for they are not sufficient in determining the key to their success .
Encarta Dictionary within Microsoft Word defines leadership as,” the ability to guide, direct, or influence people.” Expanding upon that definition, my personal definition is influencing people to follow to achieve a goal, regardless of how unpleasant. Leadership is not something that happens overnight, it needs to be cultivated over time. During that process, it is necessary to identify delinquencies and make adjustments. Reviewing the feedback provided by my LPI/360 assessment, the three areas identified I need to improve on are, praising people for a job well done, actively listening to diverse points of view, and becoming more visible within the workplace.
One may wonder exactly what it is that qualities a strong leader possesses. A strong leader is determined, and strong willed. They must be of good judgment, and without bias. They cannot easily be persuaded, and they are firm, yet at the same time, a good lead must also empathize with his subordinates, and have the best interest at heart for said subordinates, at all times. However, with that being said, a good leader cannot be afraid to discipline his subordinates when necessary. Unmistakably, being a leader is a very difficult feat – one which not everyone can accomplish. A leader must be an authority, a friend and a counsellor, all at once. They must be responsible, and always take into account the disadvantages of a situation. Not everyone is suitable to be a leader, whereas, just about anybody can be a good role model.
In Michael Siegel’s interview published by the Washington Post, he identified four successful qualities in some of the United States most successful presidents. These qualities consist of the vision the president has for the presidency, the president has to have the wherewithal to implement his vision, the presidents must focus on few major goals at a time, and the president must understand the process and implications of decision-making. Based on the information from the class Wiki page, I will analyze a series of concepts that Han and Heith discussed in Presidents and the American Presidency and argue that President Trump only follows two of the three qualities of a successful leader. First, President Trumps utilizes the bully pulpit to
Leadership is one of the important elements in an organization. It is a subject that attracts the attention for being associated with influence, power and wealth (Khairil Annas, 2009). When the topic of leadership been expressed, the main focus of the topic is related to the manner and style of leadership practiced by a leader itself. Various leadership styles were introduced by researchers on leadership that consists of autocratic leadership style, democratic leadership style, and laissez faire leadership style.
Autocratic leadership theory is a part of the behavioural approach. In this leadership theory, leader makes all decisions and uses power to command and control the followers to achieve goal. According to Lewin(1939), “autocratic leaders are associated with high-performing groups, but that close supervision is necessary and feeling of hostility are often present” (p.173). It is incredibly efficient and tasks are completed quickly. Autocratic leadership can be beneficial when decisions need to be making quickly. For example, in emergency situation surgeon uses this theory because the patient’s situation is between life and death and there is no time to discuss with other members. Bass (2008) mentioned in the Leadership styles and theories article, “Autocratic leaders can be effective because they create good structure, and determine what needs to be done. They provide rewards for compliance, but punish disobedience” (Giltinane, 2013, p. 35-37).
Lussier and Achua (2004) define the leadership styles as a combination of traits, skills, and behaviours leaders use as they interact with employees. In order for one to understand and decide on a certain leadership styles, one must know the characteristics of the favourable leadership style. Over the years researchers have been debating on the topic of leadership, as conducting different studies the styles have different output.
Several factors can directly and indirectly influence and affect choice of leadership styles in workplaces, bearing in mind that a leader’s responsibilities include but are not limited to: organising, evaluating, motivating, coaching, co-ordinating, communicating, building trust, continuously improving the team, planning, monitoring, empowering (Pet&r 2017 class notes), different factors will influence leadership styles at different times.
As per the research a good leader should be honest, sincere, recognise talent, appreciate good work, treat everyone equally, communicate well and ask for the team’s opinion. In our study we are going to showcase the characteristics of two managers whose behaviour reflect on the outcome of the organisation.
A leader is simply a person placed in charge of an organization or group. To be an effective leader a person must influence those around them to move in the same direction under a common goal. Society has come to believe an outgoing, loud, boisterous person who commands the attention of the room is a good leader. This leads to the assumption an introverted person, a commonly used antonym for outgoing, is too scared to lead and therefore hides in the corner. Introverted people are generally highly analytical and methodical in their approach concepts and conflicts, which can be confused with hesitation.
The affiliative leadership style is defined by Chapman et al. (2014) as a leader who promotes good communication within the group and places value in and supports good relationships among the team members by investing in teambuilding activities. This leadership style values positive feedback and has a high level of trust for its team members, which leads to a great amount of flexibility in how they perform their daily work (Chapman et al., 2014). Again, I feel that I have many strengths in this area. A strength I possess in this leadership style is that I work diligently to establish an environment of trust with my subordinates and spend much time developing a relationship with them. I do not micromanage my teams but rather invest time in giving feedback regarding the department’s mission/vision and their role in seeing these goals accomplished within the department to
Have you ever thought about your past or current manager(s) and their leadership skills? Are they good leaders? Think about the different traits and characteristics they have as a manager. A good leader and manager is able to empathize with their employees, take constructive criticism, and actively listen to what their employees have to say. Another aspect that a good leader must have is to be able to create a welcoming environment for each individual employee by providing proper orientations and ways for the employees to get to know each other. I have researched what it takes to be a good leader and manager and even interviewed two managers and two employees of an organization that provide excellent examples of successful leadership and managing skills. In this paper I will explain what it takes to be a good leader and manager, provide a role model of an organization with good leadership and management skills, and describe what the organization does that makes them successful.