Laughter In The Dark By Vladimir Nabokov: A Literary Analysis

1255 Words3 Pages

Often, art is used as an escape from reality for those who cannot deal with the harshness of it. For certain reasons, people find comfort things that aren’t real, things that can be found only in movies, books, or music. The effect that art can have on people’s reality can be positive or negative, but it distorts their perception of what is real and what isn’t no matter what. In Vladimir Nabokov’s novel Laughter in the Dark, Nabokov uses characterization, imagery, and irony in order to demonstrate the effect of art on reality. Albert, a seemingly bland and dull man, is an art critic, and lives a life that cannot simply be average. Albert demands a life that is portrayed in films and art; he yearns for a romance that cannot be achieved by …show more content…

The images that Vladimir Nabokov creates the sense that the characters, along with the reader, are stuck in a painting themselves. “Her nudity was as natural as though she had long been wont to run along the shore of his dreams (84).” Often in painting, the naturality of the nude body was portrayed to be the most beautiful of art forms. Here, Nabokov talks about the naturalness of Margot’s nude body, and explains that it is the image of perfection that runs through Albert’s mind. He creates the image of a naked young woman and, supported by his use of characterization in regards to Margot, a beautifully painted picture. By allowing Albert to think like this, Nabokov feeds the idea that Albert cannot be satisfied by reality. His life must be artistic, therefore so must his lover. “It really was blue: purple-blue in the distance peacock-blue coming nearer, diamond-blue where the wave caught the light. The foam toppled over, ran slowed down, then receded, leaving a smooth mirror on the wet sand, which the next wave flooded again. A hairy man in orange-red pants stood at the edge of the water wiping his glasses. A small boy shrieked with g lee as the foam gushed into the walled city he had built. Gay parasols and striped tents seemed to repeat in terms of color what the shouts of the bathers were to the ear. A large bright ball was flung from somewhere and bounced on the sand with a …show more content…

“He glanced at the poster (which portrayed a man looking up at a window framing a child in a nightshirt), hesitated-and bought a ticket (20).” During this scene, Albert sees a poster of a man looking up at a child, ironically enough this becomes his entire storyline without him even realizing it. Albert is so blinded by the beauty and fantasy of his romance that he can’t see what it’s become and how it’s ruined his life. “He had come in at the end of a film: a girl was receding among tumbled furniture before a masked man with a gun. There was no interest whatever in watching happenings in which he could not understand since he had not yet seen their beginning (20).” This coincides with one of the ending scenes of the story: Margot shooting Albert. By using irony, Nabokov is able to accomplish the idea that it’s strange that Albert depends so much on art to live, but when art is actually presented to him as in the poster for the movie or the movie itself, he fails to see how relatable it is to his own life. “There are several of these doublings, all placed cleverly, and without comment, throughout the novel. Indeed, this cleverness is part of the point of the novel, which uses a story that ought not to have any aesthetic power at all.” Pullen states that Nabokov uses several comparisons throughout his novel to show that Albert’s life should not have any artistic

Open Document