Lanyer Hero's Journey

1298 Words3 Pages

In addition of praising the Countess and her daughter, Lanyer also covertly alludes to her own worth as a poet by making use of references to Greek mythology to show to the Countess, as well as potential patrons who might have read her poetry, that despite her low class, she is educated. Though Lanyer does not explicitly state this, by using such references she is suggesting her education is great though her status may not be. Lanyer makes reference to Phoebus-Apollo, the Greek god of light, in the lines:
Whose fair green leaves much like a comely veil,
Defended Phoebus when he would assail:
Whose pleasing boughs did yield a cool fresh air,
Joying his happiness when you were there. (Cookham 63-66)
The Columbia electronic Encyclopedia explains …show more content…

One example of Lanyer’s use of pathetic fallacy is in the lines, “The little birds in chirping notes did sing, / To entertain both you and that sweet spring” (Cookham 29-30), can be read literally as birds singing in praise to the Countess, however like the bird, Lanyer uses poetry to sing the praises of the Countess as well as to entertain her. Though the Countess may not have noticed the double meaning behind Lanyer’s words, Lanyer felt as if she could not express her true feelings about the Countess and her financial situation blatantly, and the use of the pathetic fallacy allows her to do this. Even though some of Lanyer’s lines are critical of the social class, Lanyer’s praises of the Countess and her daughter are not any less sincere. Lanyer had to remember that she must remain in her place as a woman of lower-class addressing the Countess, and Anne Baynes Coiro observes that, “A crucial parts of her social radicalism is that Lanyer is writing as a woman writer to aristocratic women” (Coiro 830), meaning that as a female writer Lanyer must always be aware of her word choice, and what topics are appropriate for her to openly discuss, while remaining appealing to potential …show more content…

Chains restrict movement, but also serve as a link between two object, or in this case, Lanyer and the Countess. Lanyer acknowledges her low statues yet again as she refers to herself as ‘unworthy’ in comparison to the Countess and her daughter. Vassiliki Markidou comments that, “Although Lanyer’s temporary stay at Cooke-ham might have offered her the prospect of securing a patron in the Countess . . . the aristocratic departure prompted the painful realization that her social situation was a deeply fragile one” (Markidou 15), which is evident as the poem draws to a close and Lanyer realizes that her affections for the Countess and her daughter were stronger than their feelings were for her. Though the Countess may not have carried the same affections for Lanyer, Lanyer reflects on feeling chained to her emotionally as well as realizing that as a woman seeking patronage, she must always operate under those of higher class. Coiro perceives that, “Lanyer shows the chains of obligation, need, love, and sometimes humiliation which bind her to the women above her” (Coiro 836), this is especially evident in the closing of the country-house poem as Lanyer laments the departure of the Countess and her daughter, and must face the fact that she cannot change her social

Open Document