Mohamed Baiya
Research paper 11-12-2013
Language and Culture
Nothing distinguishes the human race from the rest of the species clearly more than owning the language and culture; Using language attributes unique to our species, we can connect any something notify minds. This ability enables us to learn from the lessons of previous generations and added to them; we live the values that you have gained in the past , as well as trial and error, to improve our lives . Has developed a combination of culture and language invincible human beings on the planet throne.
However, the question remains oriented anthropologists and linguistics is not about the reason behind the greatness of language and culture to this point, but what makes them
Important in the first place.
We know that those two tools interrelated, and the core issue is to understand the nature of this relationship. Since the philosophical era of Aristotle and Plato, I found two basic ways, it is the Platonic perspective comes « innate theory that believes that language is predetermined, and that it has a constant form is subject to change dictated by genes (or gods) . It is through the one-way; where facilitate language culture while not affecting the culture, the language, but in a minimalistic. But the idea of Aristotle says that many of the features identified by the language and cultural traditions serves socially.
Over the past fifty years ago, followed the prevailing theory see Plato, saying that language is an innate ability ...
... middle of paper ...
...e differ from those used by men; phrase « I love those blouse with purple pale » often will be the one who says lady, , unlike women who tend to the classical formulas . Similarly, differentiate culture among the spelling, the men and women of the language because they « are interested in it.
Any language that does not include the feature repeatability will be an example inversely refute this hypothesis, and this is what would argue that it applies to the language; This language refutes feature repeatability alleged Even when can learn repetition in other languages or show evidence of thinking recursively, as is the case with speakers language. Thus, if there is one language can exist without tag repeatability, all other languages can in terms of principle, and this contrasts with the claim that the repeatability is a prerequisite indispensable for human contact.
An ongoing battle of culture, freedom, and language occurs in America today. The battle is commonly called Bilingualism. The dictionary definition: being able to speak multiple languages. Though, when you dig deeper, you discover the hunger of differing tongues. Many people believe bilingualism should have a certain role in the public and education. One of these figures is Martin Espada who believe that bilingualism is also respecting one's culture. He believes that there should be more effort put into understanding different cultures and languages. An opposing figure to this is poet and author, Richard Rodriguez, who believes bilingualism should not be emphasized in the public and education system. Rather being able to speak one language and communicating is superior.
The purpose of this assignment is to explain the impact of English language learners in the classroom. As a foreign student, English language learner in the United States faces multiple challenges for achieving academic success. To successfully complete a task, they need to master both English as a language and how it is used in core content classes especially when they are an adult. When trying to assist in instructing English language learners, they usually have many concepts and language abilities that they need to master, as do the teachers that are trying to teach them. With the incorporation of the concepts and approaches to identify and assess the issues and concerns that we have learned in our classroom instruction, such as lesson preparation,
Right now the Tlingit are scattered throughout where they originally lived; Southeastern Alaska, Northern British Columbia and Southwestern Yukon in Canada. Tlingit culture is many sided and complicated, and there is a big emphasis on family and kinship. Art and spirituality are within most areas of their culture, even with everyday objects. Even spoons and boxes are decorated and filled with spiritual power and historical associations.
In Hall’s article, “Context and Meaning” it is revealed to us the importance in cross cultural communication. Context can be defined as the circumstances that form the setting for an event, statement, or idea, and in terms of which it can be fully understood and assessed. Cross cultural communication is important because it creates diversity and understanding between the workers. In this essay the reader is provided with sufficient evidence to identify the staging of context with such importance to cross culture communication, teach about culture and joint cooperatives, and business transaction, and help create a diverse workforce.
The debate nature/nurture has been a fascinating open question for many years in the field of language development and acquisition. The focus of the dichotomy aspires to understand if language depends on an innate biological endowment or because of the environmental input we receive from the external world. The literature about the nature/nurture debate counts many different theories that have as crucial topics of discussion whether either nature or nurture plays the leading role in language development. One of the most famous theories is the nativist approach, whose father, Noam Chomsky, maintains that language is innate in human because of the Universal Grammar. Actually, according to Chomsky, this ‘gift’ is the child’s initial language faculty and exists prior to any linguistic experience, so that it gives the child the ability to acquire any language (Karmilloff, 2002). In contrast to this theory, the cognitive approach states that language is not innate because we do not have a Universal Grammar, but we learn language through general learning mechanisms. In other words, language is acquired through input and experiences in the environment. Another interesting point of view about the debate nature/nurture are the researches carried out by Lenneberg, who was influenced in his theoretical and practical studies both by Chomsky and by Piaget, father of the cognitive approach that I briefly introduced below. Lenneberg studied atypical language development and carried researches in particular on deaf children, children with focal brain damages and c...
Understanding how to define a subject matter is the first step in any successful study, and for the successful explanation of language and it’s acquisition and development, a definition must first be understood. Language, as defined by Webster’s dictionary reads as, “a systematic means of communicating ideas or feelings by the use of conventionalized signs, sounds, gestures, or marks having understood meanings”. This definition provides as a useful explanation of language for an evolutionary developmental psychological perspective because the definition...
The intimacy between culture and communication exists in the fact that actors interact by way of communication which is a technique used to continue the established patterns of meaning, thinking, feeling and acting. There are common characteristics in most definitions of culture. These characteristics are that culture is shared and is a stable construct, consisting of patterns, values, symbols, meanings, beliefs, assumptions and expectations. The characteristics of culture mean that culture is socially constructed and, therefore, must be learned.
This is a claim which might seem to be a possible first guess about the evolutionary process of language, and also an alternative view from Darwin’s perspective on human psychological abilities (Pinker, 2015). The language faculty has been divided into two principles, words and grammar, the linkage behind them has been seen as an intensive challenge to discover the ‘magic power’ of language to encode information. In addition, to set up this theory, it is necessary to further prove that language is an adaptation. For example, intelligence, learning, symbol comprehension, and so on do not appear by themselves but a particular mechanism; and it is likely that different mechanisms are needed in different domains such as vision, motor control, understanding the physical and social worlds (Pinker,
I have learned a great deal about different cultures and the communication between those cultures. I didn’t really think I would learn as much as I did. I am from an older cohort than most of the people in my class; therefore my experience level is a little greater. This did not prevent me from learning a few things and enhancing the knowledge I already have.
To continue with the key features, language is known to be special because of how children are able to learn in ways that are different from learning other things. (Willingham, 2007). Strong evidence shows how prepared the human brain is to learn language with very little stimulation. The results that show this point of view to be true is known to be the worldwide consistency of language learning.
There ason why the study of the relationship between language and culture is of great significance to translation is that “A language is a part of a culture and a culture is a part of language, the two are intricately interwoven so that one cannot separate the two without losing the significance of either language or culture.” That is one cannot translate a language without translating the culture underlying the language. Culture is a fundamental concept in anthropology, The classical definition of which was first put forward by E.B. Tylor in his Primitive Culture
... that can learn many things, and because we are extraordinary social animals that value communication. Or, does language emerge anew in every generation, because it is the best solution to the problems that we care about. Problems only humans can solve. These are the debates that have raged for centuries in the various sciences that study language. With the research consistently pointing towards an innate mechanism that is responsible for our language acquisition, I believe that the innatist view of language acquisition is partially correct. Where I think their view faults is where they claim that language will develop independently of input. All of the studies that I reviewed showed a correlation between the acquisition of language and the immediate linguistic environment. Without the proper exposure to language, we are unable to an extensive language faculty.
Nearly every member of the human race learns a language or more to the degree of proficiency only in the first few years of life. How children achieve this astonishing skill in such little time has sparked controversial debates among linguists, psychologists, and scientists throughout centuries. Some believe that language is an innate ability possessed by all human beings due to the remarkable function of the brain, while others maintain that language is learned from childhood experience. However, many are beginning to realize that nature and nurture go hand-in-hand when explaining how children develop their language(s). Despite the claims that language is either pre-learned or environmentally learned alone, the combination of both genes and experience better explains the aspects of first language acquisition.
It is known, even to a person to whom the entire study of language isn't familiar, that the language is the greatest factor on which most of the human activities depend. Without any form of language, any cooperation and communication would be almost, if not totally impossible (World Book Encyclopedia 62). This significance of language is what draws scientists to study origin, differences and connections between languages. Constant change of today's languages is what amazes linguists even more. With the emergings of the new nations there was quite a number of new languages. One such case is the language of Former Yugoslavia, Serbo-Croatian, which is now called Croatian by Croats, Bosnian by Bosnians, and Serbian by Serbs. Though these languages were once united and actually dialects of one another, they split as the three nations split. With this came huge amounts of new words in Croatian and Bosnian which caused the Serbo-Croatian to rupture even further. There are few conditions that keep a language unchanged. They include a stable government, good communication, a centralized educational system, a set of beliefs and traditions, and a spirit of national unity (63) Beginning And Change of Language Today's languages all have three basic systems, phonology, grammar, and semology, and many have fourth system, writing. In the beginning, people talked and conversed, but they needed something that would record and later on recall words (Sparke 42). This destitution has resulted in early alphabets, pictograms. Pictures were used to represent objects and items. It was easy for people to represent those objects with the pictograms but it also was very hard to find a pictogram that would fulfill idea of, for example, craving (Laind 50-54). ...
There has been considerable historical discourse over the nature of language. Most contend that thought and language are two interrelated criteria. Just how these criteria relate to the controversy over whether animals have language capabilities and even more specifically to the Sapir-Whorf human language thought debate, however, is not always clear. From a human context we know that language is a skill which allows us to communicate our thoughts to others and in so doing to attain desired "biological, cognitive, and social/behavioral feedback" (McDonnell, 1977). The question as to whether language is a skill that human beings are born with or whether it is a skill that is acquired is a complex one and not one in which all researchers are in agreement.