Lacrosse Sexual Assault

Sexual assault is a problem that continues to occur in our society. A big case that was broken out in 2014 was an occurrence at Duke University when three Lacrosse players from were charged with sexual assault. This has caused debate about the adjudication of sexual assault cases regarding the process rights of the alleged accused and due process rights. This was an event that made an impact on many people, and why this case is still known today.

This was an incident committed by three players on the Duke University lacrosse team. On March 13, 2006, there was an assault that occurred at a house off-campus at Duke University . Due to this incident, the entire lacrosse team’s season has been suspended, considering that this tragic event took

The Durham County district attorney, Michael Nifong, says that no one has stepped up to admitting the crime, knowing in full force that a wrongdoing has occurred. The woman claims she was assaulted in a bathroom by three of the lacrosse team members. According to an application for a search warrant of the house this took place, “…someone closed the door, and said, “Sweetheart you can’t leave”. To get more substantial evidence, 46 of the 47 members of the lacrosse team provided DNA samples to Durham police. Officials have labeled this assault as a first-degree forcible rape, common law robbery, first-degree kidnapping, first-degree sexual offense, and felonious strangulation (Drape). The woman originally had gone to the house expecting to dance for 5 men at a bachelor’s party. Instead, found more than 40. When she performed, racial epithets were said. This woman may have felt overwhelmed with her surroundings, and felt violated. After elongated testimonies and lack of evidence and despite the intensive allegation back in 2006, on April 11, 2007, the attorney general of North Carolina has declared the lacrosse players innocent of all charges . There was no credible evidence that an attacked

Knowing that this was made aware, policies became more efficient in decreasing sexual violence and support an atmosphere of safety . Essentially, this is a letter sent out by a member from the legislative body to other fellow members containing a new bill to influence others to vote for a present issue. This originally came into place by the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) that, “told all of the more than 7,000 colleges that receive federal money to use the lowest possible standard of proof, a preponderance of evidence, in sexual assault cases (though not in less serious matters such as cheating and noise violations) . This required that Universities around the nation to appeal non-guilty findings, which is looked at as double-jeopardy. This would also give schools 60 days to handle the case. Georgetown University is an example of this change. They developed to use the preponderance of evidence standard in their resolution