Lack Of Privacy In 1984 By George Orwell

900 Words2 Pages

In the dystopian novel, “1984’, George Orwell portrays many aspects of the lack of privacy and human rights that ruin the lives of people through “Big Brother”, a very strong and controlling political figure in the novel. He is the dictator of Oceania and has the lives of everyone who lives in Oceania in the palm of his hand. The ways of this dictator are inhumane and questionable. Constantly exposing corrupt propaganda to continue brainwashing their citizens, constantly monitoring each individual to ensure they are not committing to thought crime or to any act of rebellion , and depriving the people of the ability to enjoy pleasure. If any were to rebel against the Party, hell would be brought upon them. Freedom has a different definition …show more content…

This not only is a major “creeping erosion of privacy” (Young People Give Up Privacy… 3), but the Party uses this tactic to further oppress the individuality in ideas, opinions, and creativity. The Party constantly limits the thought processes of the citizens as well as their ability to think on their own and“In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it” (Orwell 80) . Knowing they are being watched is what makes the Party so successful in having the people become almost like puppets. The main purpose of the telescreens is to make sure that no people commit to any act of rebellion against the Party. They try so hard to manage every aspect of every life down to every last detail, but in the end, one can not stop another from thinking their own thoughts. With Winston, even though he knew he would die as a result of writing “Down With Big Brother” (Orwell 19) in his journal multiple times, he still did it with no regrets. Nothing could help ease his pain of not being able to express his thoughts. Not even writing them down helps. This proves how much power the Party has over their people psychologically. The way the Party manipulates them mentally scarres their people. It confuses them where all of their thoughts contradict each other. For example, in the end of the novel, Winston looks up at a

Open Document