Knowledge Of Identity In Great Expectations, By George Orwell

1095 Words3 Pages

The fantasies one creates often distort reality if one focuses on these fantasies too closely and pursues them with a lack of regard for their current situation. Pip blindly follows his dreams of wealth while Winston pursues his idea of a utopia and abandons his current system. In their ambition, Pip and Winston allow other people to influence their identity and through different means, both manage to sacrifice their identity. As a result, Pip and Winston let their identity become modified by the future and other people instead of their current actions, objectives, and most valuable relationships that time cannot mend fast enough. George Orwell and Charles Dickens warn readers in Great Expectations and 1984 that one needs to exert caution …show more content…

Winston’s identity falls prey to O’Brien through different tactics where O’Brien alienates Winston’s peers from him. O’Brien doesn’t provide an identity for Winston, he removes Winston from the identity he has the potential to fulfill, “(Winston) felt as though he were wandering in the forests of the sea bottom, lost in a monstrous world where he himself was the monster. He was alone. The past was dead, the future was unimaginable. What certainty had he that a single human creature now living was on his side?” (Orwell 69). George Orwell wants to direct attention towards the power of the majority over the minority. He uses Oceania to exclude Winston from the majority in order break Winston in a nonphysical manner. Alone, Winston has no power over the majority, and Orwell wants to show that not only can one willingly change themselves and separate himself from his surroundings, such as Pip does, but one could also experience the same separation if their surroundings change identities instead of if one’s self changed identity. Inevitably, Winston has only two options left for his identity, he can rebel and keep what little he has, or succumb to the pressure against him and allow himself to fall victim to the will of the majority, “But if he can make complete, utter submission, if he can escape from his identity, if he can …show more content…

The moment one loses their identity, he may not realize how much he underestimates the value of what he used to have, but in due time, one eventually realizes that their identity means a lot more than they know. Charles Dickens and George Orwell both understand, and warn about numerous ways that one can lose their identity. Whether one willingly relinquishes their identity, or their peers grow to make your identity obsolete, one has to exert caution to keep their identity safe and learn to value what he currently possesses because when he loses what he has, he longs to return to what he used to have and to fix the actions that led up to the moment where he forsakes his

Open Document