Knowledge In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

658 Words2 Pages

Knowledge is facts, information, and skills acquired by a person through experience or education; the theoretical or practical understanding of a subject. Dangerous means something able or likely to cause harm or injuries. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein has made countless wonder whether or not knowledge can be dangerous. Numerous have probably seen Austin Powers in which Austin is cryogenically frozen, then brought back to life when technology had improved. Cryogenics are now being tested today, but is this knowledge to bring people back to life, potentially dangerous? From an uneducated standpoint, I believe knowledge isn’t dangerous; it’s what we do with knowledge that can be dangerous. Cryogenics, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, and the several …show more content…

Innumerable have found this knowledge dangerous, but if we’re going to die anyway, why not freeze your body for a possibility to be able to be brought back to life. As stated on the Alcor website,” If indeed cryonics patients are recoverable in the future, then clearly they were never truly dead in the first place. “This knowledge could maybe let people live forever, or further the life they had taken from them. Cryonics is knowledge that I don’t find dangerous, but helpful. Victor states,” Learn from me, if not by my precepts, at least by my example, how dangerous is the acquirement of knowledge and how much happier that man is who believes his native town to be the world, then he who aspires to become greater than his nature will allow.” I disagree with Victor Frankenstein. I don’t believe it was Victor’s knowledge that was dangerous; it was what he did with that knowledge. He took his knowledge to a whole different standpoint and he tried to basically play God. He utilized knowledge and the outcome wasn’t decent, but the knowledge could have been helpful if he wouldn’t have turned it into something bigger than the actual knowledge he obtained. Because his knowledge helped him construct a grisly fiend that destroyed everything, he blamed it on the knowledge, and said that it was dangerous when it was his actions that were actually dangerous. At the beginning …show more content…

The greatest cause of their death was plagues. One of the utmost dangerous diseases in early Louisiana was Malaria. Being so close to creeks and the humidity we have millions of mosquitoes, which brought malaria, were the reason of 1000’s of deaths. Today, because of knowledge the death rate from malaria in the US is 0%. Knowledge has turned dangerous situations into something we no longer even worry about. Because of knowledge disease is no longer the number one reason for death in the U.S., and without knowledge we would have never grown as a country and we would probably still have disease as a problem. This proves my point of knowledge not being dangerous. Therefore, knowledge is not dangerous. Knowledge can help our world prosper. Without knowledge we would still be in the same state we were in 10 million years ago, and that was not a prosperous time. However, Frankenstein did not use knowledge in a safe way, it wasn’t the knowledge that was dangerous, it was what he did with it that was dangerous. Cryogenics, Frankenstein, and recently cured diseases are three major examples of how knowledge, in the right hands, is not

Open Document