King And Parliament: Depriving Colonists Of Their Natural Rights

707 Words2 Pages

Exam Question: The British King and Parliament were depriving colonists of their natural rights, therefore justifying the colonists' actions of rebellion and independence.
The British King and Parliament were in my opinion desperately depriving the colonists of their natural rights because the colonists were forced to pay taxes upon taxes while having no representative in Parliament to represent the rights or needs of the colonists; all the King and Parliament cared about was receiving their money from the colonists. Had they been fairly represented and having some of their needs met by the British I feel like I may have a differing opinion on this but they weren’t. The colonists were paying their taxes yet they were not getting anything in return, so to speak, for the taxes they were being forced to pay; hence the colonists famous outcry and slogan, “No taxation without …show more content…

They needed the tax for more and new exploration as well as military supplies. The British were also in severe debt from the French and Indian war, part of which was fought to keep the lands under British rule and not under French rule. Following the war the colonists still needed protection from the Native Americans which would costs the British money and resources. Since at the time the colonies were considered a part of the British Empire and under British rule, it is to be assumed that the colonists would have the same rules and laws as any British citizen, so it was only fair that the colonists pay taxes like all British citizens. Which when looking at it strictly from that viewpoint it can very much be understood why the British felt they had a right to tax the colonists.
Eventually because of the aquiring debt of the British the colonists began getting taxed through acts placed on the colonists by the Parliament

Open Document