More handpicked essays just for you.
Should gay couples have the same rights as heterosexual couples
Legalization of gay marriage
Legalization of gay marriage
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public Health, 289 Conn. 135 (2008)
Facts: The plaintiffs, eight same-sex couples, were denied marriage licenses and brought action against the state and local officials. The plaintiffs made a claim stating that the state statutory prohibition, § 46b-38nn, against same-sex marriage was a violation of their right to substantive due process and equal protection under the state constitution. The Connecticut Superior Court rendered summary judgment in favor of the defendants, which resulted in an appeal from the couples.
Rule: Denying same-sex couples the right to marry, even granted them a parallel status under a civil union, violates the equality and liberty provisions of the Connecticut Constitution.
Issue: Whether
The case of Carla Washburn using the Biopsychosocial approach starts with the biological level and leads to the assessment that Carla suffers from problems with diabetes with insulin dependency. She also suffers from the physical injury she sustained after a recent fall which produced fractures to her body that needs attention. Addressing Carla’s Psychological level she exhibits symptoms of depression due to the belief that she has no one. Due to the fact that she had lost her husband fifteen years ago, moreover she also had lost both her son to a car crash and her grandson who she had raised after both parents died in a car crash to the war in Afghanistan. She also is worried about her finance because she is concerned that Medicare will not
The opinion of the court was held by Justice Kennedy, in that the Colorado amendment was held unconstitutional on the basis that it violated the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment on the United States Constitution. Kennedy argued the amendment singles out a specific group in which, it would make it so only homosexuals cannot receive the protective rights that are available to anyone else. This idea makes homosexuals unequal to everyone else because they are not guaranteed the same protection that anyone else could get if they needed it. Furthermore, the amendment burdens the homosexual community by not allowing them to seek protection against discrimination though the use of legislation. Additionally, Kennedy claims “In and ordinary case, a law will be sustained if it can be said to advance a legitimate government interest…” (632) By this he means that a law will be considered valid as long as it has a ...
Joyce Stewart is seventy two year old, white female that lives in the small town of Candor New York. She has spent the majority of her life taking care of other people, including her eight children; now six due to tragic circumstances. She also was a house wife trying to survive being a mother to her children while her husband was away in the Navy. She now is a widow; her second husband passed away about ten years ago. She grew up on a farm with a low socio economic status; she overcame circumstances that she was dealt by working her entire life and eventually living a more financially stable life. Joyce is not rich by any means, but is able to live comfortably. She owns her own house that she and
Cindy Crawford is reportedly furious over Amal Alamuddin's mockery, comparing her to the reality star Caitlyn Jenner.
PTL CARLISLE WAS SWORN IN ON 12/14/2016 AND STARTED WITH “A” SQUAD 12/15/2016. PTL CARLISLE CAME FROM THE SHERIFF DEPARTMENT WHERE HE WORKED TWO YEARS ON PATROL. PTL CARLISLE AND MYSELF SPEAK ABOUT HOW THE OPERATIONS AT TARBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT ARE HANDLED AND HOW DIFFERENTLY THEY MAY BE FROM WHAT HE IS USE TO. OVER THE PAST THREE WEEKS I HAVE WORKED CLOSELY WITH PTL CARLISLE HELPING HIM UNDERSTAND WHAT HE IS DOING WRONG AND WHAT HE COULD DO TO IMPROVE ON THE TASK LISTED ABOVE THAT NEEDS IMPROVEMENT.
Louisiana State Rep. Dodie Horton introduced legislation today that would ban roadside rabbit sales in Louisiana. The “Bunny Bill” was inspired by Haughton resident Lou Ann Holley, the owner of the only rabbit shelter and sanctuary in northwest Louisiana. Holley explained that since starting the shelter seven years ago, she has taken in dozens of abused rabbits due to roadside sales gone wrong.
In July of 2012, a same sex couple went to a cake shop in Lakewood, Co looking forward to getting a cake decorated for their wedding. But, the owner Jack C. Phillips declined to decorate a cake for their wedding, causing the couple to file charges discrimination against the shop. Although the case is still pending, This incident is what created the court case Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. The court has not made a decision on what to do about this case.
Jones Blair Case #1 Introduction In 1999, the U.S. paint industry sales were projected to be more than $13 billion. The industry has slow sales growth and is constantly changing due to government regulations. In 1999, JonesBlair had sales volume of $12 million with an annual growth rate of 4%. JonesBlair produces and sells architectural coatings, OEM coatings, and paint sundries. However, the President, Alexander Barrett, and the senior management executives know that there are some areas that they need to improve on.
For some background, this case escalated to the Supreme Court since several groups of same-sex couples from different states, sued state agencies when their marriage was refused to be recognized. As it escalated through appeals, the plaintiffs argued that the states were violating the Equal Protection clause and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Equal Protection, according to the Constitution refers to the fact that, “any State [shall not] deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law…” (23). The opposition of this case was that, 1) The Constitution does not address same-sex marriage as a policy, and 2) The sovereignty of states regarding the decision. Ultimately, and according to the Oyez project, the Court held that “[the Amendment] guarantees the right to marry as one of the fundamental liberties it protects, and that analysis applies to same-sex couples,” and therefore, same-sex marriage is a fundamental liberty.
The case study on Kevin Miller is very challenging. Kevin Miller is White 5th grade student, and his parent are very supportive. Kevin has a problem with attention span; consequently, he I has been identified as a candidate for Greentree Elementary School Gifted and Talented Program. I will attempt to describe the issues related to Kevin’s moral judgement and self-concept; furthermore, I will make recommendations on his part.
In April 2002, Texas’s highest criminal court, The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, refuses to hear Lambda Legal’s appeal. In July 2002, Lambda Legal request U.S. Supreme Court to review the constitutional regarding The “Homosexual Conduct” law. The case presents the high court with two independent Constitutional claims that Lambda Legal urges to review: 1) Equal protection 2) Rights of privacy and liberty. December 2002, U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear the case. In January 2003, Lambda Legal files its brief urging U.S. Supreme Court to overturn Texas’s “Homosexual Conduct” law. March 2003, Lambda Legal presents oral arguments before U.S. Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality of the Texas “Homosexual Conduct”
You may have always wondered if there was a correlation between social behaviour and biological functioning. At the back of my mind I am reminded of the almighty biblical “freewill” as a tool to readjust the resultant antisocial behaviour. With the human species it is difficult to assume 100% causal relationship hence it is safe to look at mediating factors that result in a person's antisocial behaviour. Barnes et al (2016) suggests that if one is to gain a greater understanding of Antisocial behaviours one must look at several domains and they include Evolutionary criminology, Biological criminology, Behaviour genetics, Molecular genetics and Neurocriminology. However, on the predictive side, increasingly, studies are examining whether the
The so-called “Copé-Zimmermann” Law, No 2011-103 of 27 January 2011 on balanced gender representation on boards of directors and on supervisory boards, places France among the leaders in Europe on the fight against gender inequality. Following a proposal of Jean-François Copé, Marie-Jo Zimmermann, Christian Jacob and Michèle Tabarot, the law has been enacted on 27 January 2011 and published in the Official Journal of 28 January 2011. The “Copé-Zimmermann” law provides for compulsory provisions (§1) that have to be complied with by companies that fall within its scope (§2).
According to the Supreme Court's ruling in US v. Windsor ("The Expanding Power of U.S. v. Windsor."), denying marriage licenses to same-sex couples is unconstitutional as a matter of e...
In March 2005, a San Francisco Superior Court judge ruled on consolidated cases regarding same-sex marriage in California. The court held that the California ban on same-sex marriage violated the state constitution. The California Supreme Court unanimously agreed to review the decision of the appellate court, and it took its time in doing so. On June 3, 2008, the California secretary of state certified ballot proposition 8, which provided simply that: "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California." Because of the court 's ruling, the State of California began legally performing same-sex marriages on June 16, 2008.In November 2011, the California Supreme Court ruled that state law did allow Prop 8 's supporters to defend it in court. Now only some states are Plowing gay marriage to be legal (Hanson). The defense of marriage act does not prohibit states from issuing same-sex marriage licenses, it set out to accomplish two key issues in regards to marriage. In its ruling, the Hawaii Supreme Court stated that a Hawaii law prohibiting same-sex marriage was unconstitutional and sent the case to a trial court in order to find out if the law could be upheld through compelling state interest. When the...