Kathleen Donegan What Happened In Roanoke

670 Words2 Pages

The Lost Colony, mainly known as Roanoke, lacked a stable and persuading conclusion. It was not understandable why Roanoke became lost. In Kathleen Donegan’s piece, What Happened in Roanoke: Ralph Lane’s Narrative Incursion, she discusses the main issue to be the lack reasons behind the abandoned settlement of Roanoke. Donegan’s central argument is not only why the settlement failed, but why Ralph Lane could not write an obvious and clear report despite being in command and having a descriptive record. Kathleen Donegan (Ph.D. American Studies, Yale University), a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, writes about how analyzing Lane’s messy narrative, Harriot’s detailed report, and Hakluyt’s devoted letter, led her to posing …show more content…

Since Donegan uses three main primary sources to support her thesis, it is concernable to the reader that her methodology is an opinion article. Instead of focusing on articles or other secondary sources, she inputs evidence from reports that “tell us a great deal about the land,” narratives that “report if the colony’s progress and failure,” and letters which “contained . . . confident projections that promoted colonial settlement,” (Donegan, 2013, p. 285). Donegan develops a thesis well supported and thoroughly defined. Ultimately, she validates that although no one can truly now the conclusion to Roanoke, Lane’s journal and point-of-view is more than a failed journey, but it documented who to fault and on what account. However, with his chaotic text, it is unclear to decide the fatality of …show more content…

However, a few times, her diction and style overshadowed her point. To prove this, Donegan says, “when we fully integrate documents that say what seemed to happen, what was wished for but didn’t happen, what never happened but was imagined as if it happened, what was never acknowledged or perhaps never even experienced but did indeed happen . . .” it is confusing to the reader, but since this is her own style and choice of diction, after rereading it was understandable, (Donegan, 2013, p. 287). Comparing Donegan’s text to Roanoke: The Abandoned Colony by Karen Ordahl Kupperman, both authors demonstrated all topics relating to settlements and ultimate failure. This is informational on behalf of first time reader who have no prior knowledge about Roanoke or settlements in the New

Open Document