Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Kashmire pakistan and india feud essay
9 grade history about india
Kashmir conflict
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Kashmire pakistan and india feud essay
Sixty years ago, the United Nations set out to distinguish the country to which the area including the valley between the Great Himalayas and the Pir Panjal mountain range belonged. The UN suggested the region, called Kashmir, could either become part of India or Pakistan, or become independent. Naturally, India and Pakistan were both enthusiastically interested in acquiring the region. In the last six decades, India and Pakistan have fought three wars with the intentions of resolving the Kashmir conflict. In 1948, men from Pakistan invaded Kashmir to gain control of it. Kashmir, however, enlisted the help of India to protect them from the invasion. In exchange, the ruler granted India control of Kashmir. Since then, Kashmir has been a part …show more content…
The Indus River, for example, is a compelling element of the region of Kashmir. The river originates in the Tibetan Plateau and is the most important river in both Pakistan and India. It brings water and therefore fertile land through Pakistan and into India. Without the resources brought by the river, people will suffer from a lack of fertile land and consequently a lack of crops. Because the Indus flows through Kashmir, the country with control of Kashmir would also gain complete control of the river. Unfortunately, neither country trusts the other enough to share the river. Economically, the river is very important to both Pakistan and India so it serves as a reason for the two to fight for Kashmir. There are also cultural and social reasons that Kashmir has further importance. For example, Kashmir is home to many religious sites. These sites are important to both the Hindus in India and the Muslims in Pakistan. Religion is very important to both of these countries; it is the reason they separated in 1947. The religious importance of Kashmir due to these sites makes the battle more significant. Additionally, Kashmir is appealing because of its location. For India, it serves as a buffer between them and Pakistan. For Pakistan, it is a perfect route into India should they choose to …show more content…
To begin, we should not send in ground troops. They would not be an effective buffer because they would cause tensions in the region to rise even more. We would also be putting our American troops at risk. The last thing we need is to send more of our soldiers into unstable, violent areas. Another action we should not take is give Pakistan money to buy Kashmir. We cannot buy peace. This would also make India unhappy with us which is something that would take a negative toll on our economy. The U.S. is already trillions of dollars in debt. It is not a good idea for us to give away money right now. A third action that we should refrain from taking is making Kashmir an independent
International conflicts have contributed to regional conflict in Southwest Asia by forming borders without regards to the different ethnic
... Jammu and Kashmir between India and Pakistan. Stronger states such as the US waged war against weaker states such as Vietnam. Interestingly, the defeat of the United States in Vietnam and of the Soviet Union in Afghanistan indicates to a more intricate concept of power which is broader than mere financial or military strength. In fact, a lot of the current theories of international relations dispute that power as conventionally described by realists is intrinsically unclear and open to analysis based on particular state of affairs. Nevertheless, it can be successfully concluded that power is primarily associated with what a state can stop another state from doing to it and what a state can do. The ways by which power is executed may be changing, yet the fundamental nature of competing desires and interests remain predominant in defining the international relations.
Due to the presence of natural resources a country may be subjected to Geopolitical fights and
The Prince of Kashmir chose India but Pakistan invaded the province soon after and have occupied part of Kashmir since then. Controversy still surrounds the province today because naturally, Muslims want to control it. While many Muslims relocated to Pakistan and the Hindus to India, half of the Muslim population was left in India and their relations did not improve after being partially separated.
This, however, does not mean that India is solely responsible for certain deadlocks, even though its share of responsibility may be larger than other countries which have their own physical limitations and political apprehensions. As elsewhere in the world, and more particularly in the subcontinent where population explosion continues and environmental degradation worsens, water resources, like energy, are going to be much lower than the increasing demand, even if they are harnessed to the most optimum. Given the depleting resources of water, the issues of human security, and water security as its most crucial part, are going to assume astronomical proportions. The issues of water distribution and management are bringing not only countries of the region, but also states and regions within provinces into conflict since they are not being settled amicably within a grand framework of riparian statutes respecting upstream and downstream rights. What is, however, quite appreciable is that the countries of the subcontinent have made certain remarkable efforts to resolve their differences over water distribution through bilateral agreements.
The uneven distribution of fresh water also causes political problems and wars. The ownership of rivers such as the Nile; can become a problem among borderlines with Egypt Sudan and Ethiopia having possible rights to the river. There can be disastrous effects to this issue.
India blames Pakistan for the militant uprising, claiming Islamabad is supporting cross-border terrorism. Pakistan responds that it merely provides diplomatic and moral support, arguing, furthermore, that India’s history of human rights abuses in the valley is to blame. With both countries now in possession of nuclear arms, the recent war in KARGIL and the increasing number of civilian deaths, refugees, and other human rights issues within Kashmir, the conflict seems to be taking on a more serious nature. In this paper, I will discuss the Kashmir conflict in some depth, examining the problem in its historical context and assessing whether there is sufficient political will at present to resolve the dispute.... ... middle of paper ...
Although the tensions in the region have been growing recently, this is not a new problem. Hindus of India and Muslims of Pakistan have fought for land and power over the centuries, as each culture has attempted to spread their beliefs. This has led to India and Pakistan violently attempting to take control of the Kashmir region to reap the benefits of its vital resources. The conflict between these two countries has been tense since the Partition of British India in 1947, creating an independent India. As borders were determined, the Muslim and Hindu region of Kashmir was an area that India and Pakistan both wanted to control, making it nearly impossible to come to a peaceful solution.
...entiate states of India and Pakistan, and this was ready to make states reflecting the country state perfect. India is an overwhelmingly Hindu nation made complete out of individuals united by religion and social likenesses, and Pakistan is a dominatingly Muslim nation whose populace is glad for its homogeneous Muslim religion and society. The borders were established to correspond and additionally conceive with the ethnic limits, so the current outskirts strived to keep Muslims in Pakistan and Hindus in India. Shockingly, it was not drawn well, and a mass relocation of Hindus into India and Muslims into Pakistan brought on an unsafe time of religious and ethnic strain between the two countries. Regardless of beginning strains, the outskirt between India and Pakistan has been moderately compelling in minimizing ethnic and religious pressures as the British trusted.
The valley of Kashmir has its ancient history and civilization. As Biscoe (2005: 67) confessed “Kashmir fortunately possesses an ancient history and a civilization more ancient than our own”. The land of the valley is very fertile and was known as seat of learning in the past. In fact, scholars came from different parts of the world in order to acquire knowledge from the ancient Kashmiri teachers and scholars.
The Indian independence movement was a movement against the British who had ruled over India for over 200 years. They first came to India for their raw resources. India eventually wanted to be self-sufficient and independent. Mohandas Gandhi was the leader of the Indian Independence movement and led a nonviolent revolution. Gandhi’s independence movement is very significant because it changed the life of Indians drastically from being under British rule to becoming independent.
Prior to August 14, 1947, India was part of the British Empire who thought that the Hindus and Muslims could live together as one nation. However, he Muslims who lived in the area which today is known as Pakistan were becoming increasingly displeased with the religious differences between themselves and the Hindus who lived in their area. Pakistan was created at midnight on August 14, 1947. India won its independence from British rule the next day. The partition was a major event because it was the birth of a new country. The Hindus and Muslims who lived in both countries were distressed and as a result there were violent acts. This partition had an adverse effect on the bordering city of Kashmir because it was literally cut in two. Half of the city was in India and the other half was in Pakistan. As of today, there is much friction between Pakistan and India because their religious differences are still unresolved.
Every one knows that the Muslims of India were not willing to live with biased Hindu majority because of their hypocritical character, pagan ideologies and no belief in the Day of Judgment. Muslims of India had realized this fact. The Two-Nation theory was the result of their feelings. The Muslim League was founded by Muslims of India in 1906. Allama Iqbal promulgated the idea of separate land piece for the Muslims of India in 1930. This idea of independent state was endorsed by the Muslims of all India in March 1940 through the Pakistan Resolution at Lahore. The idea of independent state in the territories where the Muslims were in majority was also accepted and endorsed by the British Government of India in June 1943. All of these facts are on the record and no one can deny it.
Ruby Kaur May 10, 2014 Source 1 Ricardo Pollack is distinguished as a director because of the documentary, Partition: The Day India Burned (2007). The documentary itself discusses the detrimental consequences of the withdrawal of Britain's reign from India in 1947, which led to the forced relocation of men, women, and even children across newly defined border lines, along with violence, rape, and murder. The film makes its argument through dramatized reconstructions and witness testimonies, which offer personal insight into the horrors of the partition and conjure up feelings of sympathy and remorse. The film intends to make an educated public more aware of how an ethnically diverse nation was tragically divided and its effects on civilian lives. This is a secondary source with primary sources because it is based on witness testimonies and an actual historical event, but offers its own evaluation on the issue through dramatized reconstructions of the event.
For the students of political history especially if they are interested in the chapter of South-Asian conflicts the topic concerning Jammu & Kashmir still has mysteries to solve, its question still haunts world leaders; its solution still remains rocket science for the ambassadors to solve and the only dispute which can provide the fatal spark to the nuclear blast.