Kant's Duty Ethics

1005 Words3 Pages

In September of 2015, a study by the International Council on Clean Transportation, or the ICCT, found that the Volkswagen Jetta and Passat were producing much higher NOx emission than the legal limit allowed (Topham). This in and of itself interested ICCT and after further testing they contacted the EPA. After these revelations and the report to the EPA, it became known to the general public that Volkswagen deceived the EPA and their consumers. Volkswagen had engineered a defeat device to cheat through its regulation testing. Two years later, senior Volkswagen engineer, James Liang, was sentenced for his part in the development of the software. James Liang was commissioned by Volkswagen to create the defeat device as he worked on the EA 189 …show more content…

First we will talk about Kant’s interpretation of will and duty. Will is the what enables our actions. It is a member of our brain that can be trained. Interestingly, will can conflict with our minds intellect when we know that something is not in our best interest and still do it anyway. This is the definition of a weak will. More so than will, however, duty should motivate us. Duty is the right thing to do and Kant uses it and will to determine the morality of one's actions. To Kant if you complete an action for any other reason than because it is your duty it is not moral. Kant’s duty ethics does not consider or care about consequences, but only the will. To be more specific, duty ethics only cares about the purity of one's …show more content…

If he held the maxim; do your job, you may not consider his actions immoral. As discussed earlier morality according to duty ethics only cares about the pureness of will. From what we can tell, James did his job without objection. His will may have been to do his job and perfectly aligned with his duty. Therefore, we might consider his actions moral. However, you must test his maxim against the categorical imperative. Should it be universal law to do your job? What if your job involves taking others for granted? According to Kant, we are to respect other humans. As rational beings we have free will and deserve the respect of each other. This is one area that James has clearly failed. He did not have the respect for the EPA or Volkswagen consumers and aided in lying to them. I believe that the universalization of the maxim that would make James’s action moral is impossible. You must add qualifiers to his maxim to make it true and this does not allow it to become universal. One example of a qualifier to his maxim is: do your job unless you put others in harm's way. In the end, James actions according to duty ethics would be considered

Open Document