Kalam Cosmological Argument Essay

1. Craig’s “Kalam Cosmological Argument” is based on three main premises. The first premise being that everything which begins to exist requires a cause. The second premise is the universe began to exist. The last premise is that the universe requires a cause. In order to infer from this that the universe has a cause of its existence, the advocate of the Kalam cosmological argument needs to show that the past is finite, that the universe began to live at a definite time. Scientists gathered verification that the universe started with the big bang, which means it must have a root, specifically God. The essence of Craig’s claim is his contention that the reality of an actual infinite, encompassing the development of a definite infinite by sequential

Anselm’s Ontological Argument embraces the perspective that all people can support the perspective of God whom is a being of which no greater entities greater can be visualized. If one thinks of a being that is greater than the original thought, then the initial conception cannot be God. God exists as an idea in the mind. Anselm supports the idea that a being that exists as a conception in the mind and in reality is, greater than a being that exists solely as a conception in one‘s imagination. So, if God exists only as an idea in the mind, then one can imagine something that is greater than God. But, we cannot imagine something that is greater than God, for it would go against the definition of God who is conceived to be the greatest possible being that can be thought of. Therefore, God exists. Gaunilo objected Anselm’s argument claiming that the foundation of Anselm’s argument could be used to prove anything, not just the existence of God. Gaunilo argued by replacing God with an island. He said, it is possible to imagine a superior island, in which no greater one exists. Gaunilo was sure that the perfect island must exist. Because, if it did not, then it would be feasible to envision an island greater than that island than which no greater can be conceived. Gaunilo has proven that using Anselm’s form of reasoning, we can prove the existence of any bizarre entities, ones that evidently do not exist. Therefore, Anselm’s reasoning’s are not a credible source. In response to Gaunilo’s criticism, Anselm pronounced that creating the reality of an island or any other entity cannot be compared to conceiving the existence God. Although, Anselm 's God was a life form in which nothing more magnificent can ever challenge. Anselm had a conception of a God so appreciable that no island, no man, nor anything in the world could even measure close