Kachina Petroleum Case Study

1151 Words3 Pages

What social responsibilities, if any, did Kachina Petroleum Equipment Company have in reporting the fraud discovered after Marsh resigned?
Social responsibility requires individuals to fulfill their civic duty to benefit society by striking a balance between economic growth, the welfare of the society and the environment. In this regard, Kachina Petroleum Equipment Company had a legal and ethical responsibility to report the fraud discovered after Marsh resigned. Under the Consumer Protection Act of 2009 was created to improve accountability and transparency the company was legally responsible to report the crime. Kachina is expected to safeguard the interests of the stakeholders which is this case would require Management to report fraudulent …show more content…

Effective internal control would have detected the fraud the in its initial stage. The most common internal controls that is evidently missing is segregation of duties which is the concept of having more than one person completing a task, therefore, with Marsh being the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), he should not be allowed to write, and sign checks especially without a second authority figure approval (segregation of duties, n.d.). Proper documentation and reconciliation of monthly transactions which are critical internal control that help to reduce fraud was evidently not in place or was not a separate duty. Management must ensure that all documents and transactions such as sales receipts, bank deposits and payments to vendors are monitored and reconciled weekly or monthly. Companies without internal control process or fraud prevention mechanisms will provide opportunities for fraudulent activities, hence the reason Marsh was able to setup and make payments to families and …show more content…

To this end, he might have become very confident of the way he tactfully conducted his fraudulent activities, which gave him the urge to continue with the practice at Weststar.

Should Kachina Petroleum Equipment Co. be held somewhat responsible for not formally reporting the fraud to the authorities when they knew Marsh was a crook? Explain.
Kachina Petroleum Equipment Co. should be held responsible for not formally reporting the fraud to the authorities. Management is responsible for the long-term success of the company and as such must act in the best interests of the company and ensure that the company’s assets are not misused or mismanaged. No company is immune to embezzlement, it is therefore important for management to report incidences of fraud to show that they are operating legally, ethically and transparently and is not engaged in conspiracy. While it can be argued that divulging too much information may put the company in a questionable light, not reporting the matter send a negative message to employees, stakeholders and customers when the scheme is eventually

More about Kachina Petroleum Case Study

Open Document