Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Paper on the u.s juvenile justice system
Paper on the u.s juvenile justice system
Juvenile justice system history
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Paper on the u.s juvenile justice system
The history of America’s Juvenile Justice System has dramatically change sense it’s hey days in 1800s or 18th century. The welfare of youth, young adult and juvenile have encountered the Progressive Era of reform, The Libertarians, The Delinquency Prevention Control Acts of 1968, The Juvenile Justice Delinquency Prevention and Act of 1974, and the Get Tough on Crime legislation; however these programs for their time seem to fit the margin in which youth could galvanize some form of rehabilitation through it. The Juvenile Justice System of past has moderate beginning for which one stands out with result to prove its worthiness.
First, under the Progressive Era the need was to build reform school with the goal to increase education and moral standards. These acquisition led 48 states to restructure their courts and reestablish their own Juvenile Court System of course this was not enough so they went forth with the media to expose the thing or shall I say, bring attention to the business that brought about problem youth faced at the period of time.
…show more content…
It had appetite of an adult court system; moreover, they could misrepresent the juvenile, disregard the parent authority over the child, cross examination, and obtain legal counsel. The Libertarian was hell bent on exposed courts.
Thirdly, the Juvenile Delinquency Prevention and Control Act of 1968 this act was prompted to encourage the states to create environments that would enable delinquents to engage in a positive form of life through federal
Vito, Gennaro F., and Clifford E. Simonsen. Juvenile justice today. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2004. Print.
This paper will analyze the different theoretical issues pertaining to the modern juvenile court, determine their origin, and suggest a course of action for resolving these issues to the best extent possible. It is important to note, however, that the juvenile justice system alone cannot ever prevent all juvenile crime, respond perfectly to every situation or treat every suspect fairly. Furthermore, an effective antidote to modern juvenile crime would necessitate far broader action, addressing underlying social structure inequalities that breed poverty and social disorganization.
Although putting juveniles into institutions, for many juvenile offenders occurred in the first decades of the 1900s, extensive use of probation for juveniles existed as well. As it does today, probation gave a middle ground nature for judges connecting release and placement in an institution. By 1927, trial programs for juvenile offenders existed in approximately every state. In the 1940s and 1950s, reformers attempted to improve the conditions found in most juvenile institutions. Alternatives to institutions emerged, such as forestry and probation camps. These camps provided a prearranged setting for male juvenile offenders, while emphasizing learning and occupational skills. Though, the efficiency of these options as alternatives to incarceration was dubious since they were not obtainable to the worst offenders. Yet, these changes marked the start of formal, community-based instruction that would turn out to be more extensive in following decades.
Before the Progressive Era, children who were over the age of seven were put in jail with adults. In the early part of the 1800’s reformers started to become concerned with the overcrowded environment in the jails and prisons, and the corruption young kids were experiencing when locked up with adult prisoners. The Progressives in the late nineteenth century started to push for universal reform in the criminal justice system (Myers, 2008). The Progressives looked to move away from the penalizing aspect and more towards a rehabilitative system, with regard to the rectification of delinquent children and adolescents. A specific group of Progressives, called the "child savers," focused the majority of their attention on finding and curing the causes of juvenile delinquent behavior. The child savers group viewed the juvenile offenders as adolescents in need of care and direction, not punishment (Myers, 2008). In In re Gault (1967), Justice Fortas summed up the views of the child savers: “The early reformers were horrified by adult procedures and penalties, and by the fact that children could be given long prison sentences and thrown in jails with toughened criminals. They were overwhelmingly convinced that so...
Justice has always been the goal of our court system, but it is not always served, especially in cases involving juveniles. The judiciary process has evolved from a system that did not initially consider juveniles, to one where juveniles have their own court proceedings, facilities, and even rules or laws. The juvenile justice system has come a long way, and people have worked very hard in its creation. A juvenile is considered to be an individual, under the age of 18, resembling an adult. However, resembling an adult does not always mean that juveniles will have an adult mindset. Thus, juveniles may need extra attention to help get their lives on track. This paper will analyze various ways involving juveniles and correction facilities and programs.
This paper describes the various legislations and movements that were established in 19th century to address the issue of juvenile justice system. It outlines the challenges faced by the legislation and movements and their implications in addressing the issues of the juvenile justice system.
Over the years many laws and policies have been created and altered. As a result many activities have become illegal. With so many laws in place now, juvenile crime is also on the rise. More and more juveniles are being sent to prison than ever before. The goal of the juvenile justice system was to rehabilitate but now it is more focused on punishment. However, many rehabilitation programs are still in place to help delinquent juveniles get back on the path to becoming successful productive members of society. One program that comes to mind is the restorative justice program.
Due to the increased recognized differences between adults and juveniles in terms of needs and developmental capabilities, offender’s treatment differ depending on whether they are treated in an adult or juvenile court. In the adult court jurisdiction, public safety and retribution are the most salient tenets while in the juvenile courts the best the intentions are intended towards the best interest of the child focusing on rehabilitation. The best goals and objectives of the juvenile court sanctions aim at ensuring that the youth in trial at the juvenile court desists from delinquent behavior and thus easy to be reintegrated in the society once more. This fact is mainly achieved through offering the youth individualized case management programs
Sexual abuse is a major thing which affects everyone. There are many issues that cause sexual abuse to prevent how to deal with the situations. The juvenile detention system process is when young teens get incarcerated is to change them but, they are being abused by the staff members which will make them violent. During juvenile incarceration, teen offenders are often generally abused which causes them to relapse to the life of crime once they are released.
The juvenile justice system was created for the purpose of rehabilitation to the trouble youth. The juvenile justice system has developed through the years as the incarcerate youth continues to increase. The youth of America continue to fall through the cracks as each young adult becomes involved with the juvenile justice system. Youth in America often struggle with identity, sense of belonging, validation, love, and support from their families and peers. As many of the youthful offenders continue to search for support, they often fall on the wrong path which leads them into the juvenile justice system.
The growing number of children engaging in criminal activities led to the development of parens patriae, dramatically changed the punishment process and has acquired new approaches to the criminal sentencing of juvenile delinquents. In the United States, juvenile courts operate in a different approach from criminal courts in which there is an absence of criminal records, lack of jury trials, consideration of the juvenile’s social situation and an emphasis on rehabilitation alternatives. Moreover, with the increase in juvenile crime rate, preventing children from committing crime and the separate legal framework for juvenile delinquents will require continuing advances in federal
From Theory to Practice: Delinquency Prevention; Alternatives to the Juvenile Justice System; Improving the Juvenile Justice System. (1982). Department of Justice, Washington, DC. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
"So many kids end up in the juvenile justice system before they've been able to get help. They end up getting it (help) through the juvenile justice system, and that's wrong. A kid shouldn't have to commit a crime to get the help that they need."(-Lori Reynolds). The following essay gives data on the current epidemic of juvenile delinquency in the
Juvenile court is a special court or department of a trial court which deals with under-age defendants charged with crimes or who are neglected or out of the control of their parents. The normal age of these defendants is under 18, but juvenile court does not have jurisdiction in cases in which minors are charged as adults. The procedure in juvenile court is not always adversarial, although the minor is entitled to legal representation by a lawyer. Parents or social workers and probation officers may be involved in the process to achieve positive results and sav...
The act of participating in a crime by a minor is considered juvenile delinquency. This criminal act may be punished by many different means, designed specifically to deal with those who are under the statutory age of majority, which is the threshold of adulthood in law. However, many people argue that the severity of the juvenile prosecution system isn't high enough to order proper punishment. Therefore, juvenile offenders should be tried under adult laws. In 1899, the Juvenile Court Act was approved which established the nation's first juvenile court. It was founded on three principles: young offenders are not ready to be held accountable, have not fully developed a sense of maturity, and can rehabilitate as well as change their behavior. Now, anyone charged with committing a criminal act before their 18th birthday is considered a juvenile offender. More than ever, the country has begun to question the reliability of the juvenile courts. The juvenile court system should be abolished. It is not only too unrestricted for the juvenile offenders, but is also an inefficient response to