Julius Caesar is a Political Play

2101 Words5 Pages

Julius Caesar is a Political Play

Have you noticed that all political plays backgrounds are nearly

always the same? They all always have a mischievous plot to them.

Shakespeare has fitted two years of Julius Caesar's life into just two

hours. Julius Caesar is a political and a historical play, so I aim to

look at both of the aspects of the play. In my piece of writing I

intend to write about the historical background of the play, the main

characters, the conspirators and the purpose of the plot. I will write

an in depth analysis on the two major political speeches made by

Brutus and Mark Anthony, the explanation to political Shakespearean

background to political intrigue, in this case Queen Elizabeth, the

Babington plot and how the audience would react to the theme of the

play. Finally I will write a conclusion and inclusion of how politics

never really changes. Julius Caesar was born on July 13, 100 BC in

Rome to Julius Caesar and Aurelia. He is an only son but he had a

sister named Julia. Caesar's family was not rich or very influential.

His family was one of the last recognized Patrician families. Caesar

was said to be homosexual with king Nicomedes IV of Bithynia. This

accusation would be a smear on Caesar for the rest of his life. In 80

BC Caesar participated in the siege of Mytilene where he is awarded

the "Civic crown" for saving a Roman citizen. It was the highest award

for any Roman Citizen! In 77 BC Caesar left for Rhodes to study

Oratory under Apollonius Molon. He needed to brush up on his public

abilities in order to climb the "Cursus Honorum", the political

ladder. Caesar had three wives Cornelia, Pompeia and Calpurnia. C...

... middle of paper ...

... the coding were also arrested and confessed. Mary was arrested and

sent to Tixall.

In most political plots the audience would have either understood the

play by understanding the words or by the performers expressions. Only

the more educated people would understand the words everyone else

would understand it by expressions of the performer.

Politics never really changes. In the modern era in some countries the

government are strict and expose the danger quickly. In the roman era,

emperors were executed if they were corrupt or if they weren't doing

the job properly. Cf Ceaucescu was executed live on television because

he was corrupt and was causing economic disaster to the country he was

ruling. This proves that politics never really changes because rulers

are executed in the modern era as well as in the roman era.

Open Document