Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

551 Words2 Pages

A person willing to step forward and speak will have a more recognized voice and that is why public speaking is one of the most vital components of leadership. Through public speaking many leaders have thrived to the top and have even gone as far as to motivating people to start world wars. Public speaking has been around for hundreds of years, which even dates back to ancient Rome with Julius Caesar. In act three of William Shakespeare's play, Julius Caesar, Mark Antony persuades the people of Rome with the use of ethos, pathos, and repetition. Mark Antony uses public speaking as a crucial weapon to convince the Roman people that the conspirators are horrible people.
During the eulogy Mark Antony motivates the people of Rome, as well as play with their emotions. Antony points out that Brutus was wrong by saying Caesar was ambitious saying,
When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept.
Ambition should be made of sterner stuff.
Yet Brutus says he was ambitious,
(3.2.90-93)
Mark Antony is building up Caesar's character and showing the people Caesar only cared for the good of his people. The crowd now knows Caesar's death has indeed been unjustified, and Mark Antony uses the crowds anger to motivate them and take action. One of the many angry crowd members says, “Poor soul! …show more content…

During the eulogy everything that Mark has said is reflecting poorly on Brutus by making it seem as he is uncaring, a trait a friend showed not have. Mark Antony begins by saying “For Brutus, as you know, was Caesar’s angel.”(3.2.176) Antony has now tapped into the crowd’s emotion by showing how much Caesar truly cared for Brutus making Brutus seems like a foe than a friend. His clever use of pathos makes the crowd want to take action for what has happened to their beloved Caesar. Marks use of repetition also helps the crowd take action for

Open Document