Julius Caesar Leadership

613 Words2 Pages

The ideal leader An ideal leader is someone who is intelligent enough to rule but is also sympathetic enough to please the people. In Roman times, Brutus stands out as being an ideal leader to the Plebeians. The roman people love Brutus and listen too him. Even though the romans are persuaded easily they know and trust Brutus judgment. Brutus may not be very intelligent but his love for Rome makes him an ideal leader. His act of persuading the plebeians also works in his favor. Brutus's love for Rome and only doing good for Rome puts him high regard with the plebeians. Brutus believes it is for the good of Rome if Cesar dies," If it be aught toward the general good, Set honor in one eye and death i' th' other, And I will look on both indifferently" (1.3.87). Brutus thinks by taking Caesars life Rome will benefit and he would even be willing to die too.However, every action Brutus does is only for the good of Rome. Brutus thinks killing Caesar was for the greater good when he explains to the Plebeians,"... I rose up against Caesar, this is my answer: it’s not that I loved Caesar but that I loved Rome more" ( 3.1.20). He also explains that because, …show more content…

Therefore, Brutus is similar with Donald Trump when it comes to persuading people. Trump uses,"... his negotiating skills to join an exclusive social club" (Atkins). Trump uses those skills to move up a social class and make people like him. Just like when Brutus used his skills to make the plebeians think Caesar need to die because,"...he was ambitious, I slew him"( 3.2.30-35).Trump's,"... strengths was recognizing opportunity where others saw nothing" (Atkins).Brutus doesn’t see opportunity as where Trump sees it and uses it to his advantage. Brutus and Trump are alike in many ways but also contrast quite a bit. Even so, Brutus has greater qualities than Trump. These qualities make Brutus a better

Open Document