Jonathan Kaplan's The Accused

1273 Words3 Pages

Jonathan Kaplan’s 1988 trial drama The Accused is the story of a young woman, Sarah Tobias, who is gang raped by three patrons in a bar, while bystanders watched and encouraged the offenders. After the crime, the Assistant District Attorney (ADA), Katheryn Murphy, plea bargains with the defense attorneys, and the offenders receive a reduced charge of reckless endangerment (2 ½-5 years in prison). Tobias, the victim, outraged by this verdict seeks to find justice for her suffering. Eventually Murphy, the ADA, successfully persecutes three active bystanders with criminal solicitation charges due to their role of inducing the attack. In many ways, The Accused depicts the reality of how sexual assault cases are handled today. Receiving equal …show more content…

To sell news, the media’s coverage of sexual assaults tends to be slanted with imposed stereotypes upon the victim. An example of media coverage in The Accused occured after the initial appearance before the judge when the offenders are granted bail. The news station only covered the offenders’ angle and stated, “the facts will prove the victim was not really raped.” The defense attorney stated in his interview, “There was no rape. The so-called victim participated enthusiastically…put on a show” (Kaplan, The Accused). One offender is immediately congratulated with applause from fellow college students watching the media coverage. The movie demonstrated journalists’ and media’s power and ability to sway and form public opinion. Society begins to believe only what they are told from these sources. Through biased news coverage of criminal acts, especially sexual assault, the media is already playing judge and jury effecting the outcome of the …show more content…

Murphy did not advise or consult Tobias prior to accepting the plea deal, leaving the victim to learn about the agreement through media coverage. Even though most States’ Victim Right’s Amendments stipulate this as a right, prosecutors rarely consult the victim during or after plea bargaining (Karmen 326). Fortunately, Murphy felt remorse towards Tobias for not offering her the chance to testify against her offenders before agreeing to a plea. To make amends, she pressed criminal solicitation charges against three active spectators and successfully won. This allowed Tobias the chance to tell her story in court and legally document the event as rape. While the plea-bargaining process does allow the criminal justice system to run smoother, it can silence the victim’s voice, minimize the severity of the offense, and deprive victims and society of moral

Open Document