Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of political institutions on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of political institutions on society
For every action, there is always a consequence that follows. When it comes to the economy and politics, one single action has been able to change the whole world forever. As stated by John Ruskin, “What we think, or what we know, or what we believe is, in the end, of little consequence. The only consequence is what we do.” What the author is trying to tell is that thoughts are useless without an action to follow. If a person wants to make a difference in society, they need to go out of their comfort zone, go the extra mile, and make a difference. Or, perhaps, a great thought can end up to be a waste. With this in mind, Ruskin is pointing out an aspect about how people feel the need to follow others. They do what others expect them to do,
In "Self-Reliance," philosopher Ralph Waldo Emerson argues that people shouldn't be reliant on what others in society think. The main point of this essay is for people in society to realize that the only way to be comfortable is to be uncomfortable first. Throughout the essay it can be complicating to understand what Emerson is trying to accomplish. In the first paragraph Emerson states," The soul always hears an admonition in such lines." He also writes," Watch that gleam of light which flashes across his mind." Lastly Emerson claims," we shall be forced to take with shame our own opinions from another."
It just goes to prove that obedience is ingrained in us all from the way we are raised. We are raised to listen to our elders in the family situation or individuals in authority in the school and workplace situations (McLeod).
Furthermore, sometimes the desire to be accepted is stronger than prevailing conventions. This makes an individual to do things to make him feel accepted in the society. Krakauer compares the people in Alaska and McCandless. He writes, “And I’m sure there are plenty of other Alaskans who had a lot in common with McCandless when they first got here, too, including many of his critics. Which maybe why they’re so hard on him. Maybe McCandless reminds them a little too much of their former selves” (Krakauer 221). In today’s society, an individual confirms itself to what a society wants and expect him or her to be.
Life is game of tradeoffs in which every action has a distinct cost. Cost, in the context of the previous sentence and the rest of this essay, is the price or expenditure that must be paid in order to obtain a particular object or goal. The most basic cost associated with all things is time. In order to attain all the material and immaterial things that we currently possess we had to use up a respectable amount of our time here on earth. Thus, it stands to reason that time defines who we are. If someone were to strip away a human being’s time on earth, they would be ultimately stripping away his or her identity. Unfortunately, in every society there are one or more groups of people that have to face some sort of social injustice, which leads to a painstakingly difficult life. The victims of the social injustice are deprived of their time on earth, as they have to constantly deal with the inequality or discrimination issues that abound. To fight any sort of rooted social injustice in a society to benefit the common good is never an easy task. It is, however, a necessary task that must be undertaken. In order to make any sort of lasting progress in the fight for social justice and the common good revolutionaries have to change the way in which they view themselves and be prepared to spill their own blood. An analysis of Melissa Lane's lecture on "sustainable citizenship," Antigone, and "How a Single Match Can Ignite a Revolution" will demonstrate how rebellious people act in the face of social injustice.
“Every individual necessarily labors to render the annual revenue of the society as great as he can. He ... neither intends to promote the public interest, nor knows how much he is promoting it. He intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention. By pursuing his own interest he frequently promotes that of the society more effectually than when he really intends to promote it.
A person has the choice to become either a positive or negative influence on this planet, and it is up to them to make that personal decision. Many believe that one person cannot make a difference unless there are extreme outside circumstances, such as growing up in a family of distinction. However, Goodall believes very differently. “What a difference a single individual could make in our gradual process toward a moral world…Yes, each one of us carried seeds for change.” One person can make a difference, but not all of these changes need to be so big that they are written down in history books. In fact, just the difference that one person can bring about on another person has the potential to create a snowball of differences. One person says a kind word to another person, the next person passes that positive sentiment on, and so on and so forth. This is the idea of “paying it
we make in life affect us in many ways. The next possible interpretation of that quote is
A wealthy person, with the desire to do well with their fortune, could benefit society in a number of ways. Carnegie has verbally laid a blueprint for the wealthy to build from. His message is simple: Work hard and you will have results; educate yourself, live a meaningful life, and bestow upon others the magnificent jewels life has to offer. He stresses the importance of doing charity during one’s lifetime, and states “…the man who dies leaving behind him millions of available wealth, which was his to administer during life, will pass away ‘unwept, unhonored, and unsung’…” (401). He is saying a wealthy person, with millions at their disposal, should spend their money on the betterment of society, during their lifetime, because it will benefit us all as a race.
He said that, no matter what conditions existed, the blame lay no more heavily on the politician and his machine controlling city, state, or nation, than on the shoulders of the average citizen who concerned himself so little with his government that he allowed men to stay in power in spite of his dissatisfaction because he was too indifferent to exert himself to get better men in office. In order to maintain such a jewel of democracy, a new superior breed of citizen is required, one that has stepped forward and reached out to carry the torch of freedom and guard it from those that would seek to extinguish it. He or she must wear his or her citizenship like a badge of honor. For citizenship to be so greatly prized it must be earned. One should have to make great sacrifices in order to be awarded the status quo of a class that steers and maintains the republic for the greate...
Our entire country, from our morals to our economy to the spark that ignited the revolution, is based on the famous idea of the “American Dream”. This is the idea that our land is one of opportunity, that draws people in to start a fresh life and try to strike it rich. This is the idea of owning private land, something all to themselves. The beautiful green plains and the bustling cities of the North are glamorized to the point where America seemed like a haven to the people in other countries. It was a place where miracles happened everyday to the most common of people. Somebody who came from nothing could grow to become a respected leader. But what the citizens of America did not realize was that somebody who was well off could plummet to the bottom just as easily. They didn’t realize that there were no miracles that didn’t come from hard work, that they couldn’t just strike it rich and climb the ranks without effort. They didn’t realize how hard it was, how gruesome America really was for the people who couldn’t get lucky, who couldn’t afford to feed themselves.They didn’t realize that the American Dream was exactly what it is defined as; just a dream.
“What I must do, is all that concerns me, not what the people think.” (Emerson, 552) demonstrates that Emerson wants individuals to discover their true self that have unique way of thinking and should have a strong sense of self; The strong sense of self is also presented by “A great man is coming to eat at my house. I do not wish to please him: I wish that he should wish to please me.” (Emerson, 555) while stating that nobody’s ideas should be less valued. Through “The one thing in the world of value, is, the active soul, --the soul, free, sovereign, active.” (Emerson, 539) he shows his preference of resisting influences thinkers in past brings because he believes individuals nowadays can come up with better ideas and reading old ones will hold creativity back. In case that Emerson sticks with the stand that everybody can look into themselves carefully and bring up brand new and great thoughts to contribute to the world, he has no compassion toward poor people. If each individual has ability to be self-reliant, and then the only reason why poor people are poor is that they do not even try to manage their destiny. Therefore, unlike Franklin, Emerson questions “Are they my poor?” (Emerson, 552) to blame poor people.
In Ralph Waldo Emerson’s “Self-Reliance,” Emerson calls for each person in society to be wholly true to themselves. He claims that it is most rewarding to the individual and the society for people to believe in one’s own thoughts and not in the thoughts of others. Emerson believes that conformity will ultimately lead to an individual’s demise because by living for others, people are not being true to themselves. Therefore in order to have a well-formed society, citizens should focus inward and have confidence in their own ideas before beginning to look towards other individuals; moreover, Emerson calls individuals not only in “Self-Reliance,” but also in numerous essays to act independently from conformity and to live for themselves.
...terests of all who could be affected by the course our actions. Obviously, as human beings we can never consider all possible choices, calculate and compare consequences quantitatively, and be without bias. Your obligation is to do the best you can, while considering as many choices as possible. One could argue that, amidst the capitalist climate of our current world, utilitarianism calls upon us to look beyond the self for the greater good. Wouldn't it be admirable if all governments could follow this maxim? To conclude on the same point at Mills, “Whether it is so or not, must now be left to the consideration of the thoughtful reader”.
...Russian society and social norms. The greatest reminder of this is found in the fact that Lopahkin, the man who Ranevsky once spoke to condescendingly, is now the family’s last hope for survival. Ironically enough, Lopahkin is often glancing at his watch, a reminder that time is changing, and a message that he, himself, is a testament to.
Moreover, in most aspects of everyday life, a person will not be affecting large numbers of other people, and thus need not consider his or her actions in relation to the good of all, but only to the good of those involved. It is only the people who work in the public sphere and affect many other people who must think about public utility on a regular basis (Spark Notes,