John Carroll The Problem With New Data Summary

603 Words2 Pages

In “The Problem with New Data”, an article, Jon Carroll discusses the threat that restricts our beliefs by the information around us. First, he points out that there is a gap that can be hardly recognized between conventional perspectives and realistic elements in our society by using Dr. Hansen’s story. Second, the author states that the news might be controlled and it affects our life without letting us know. Lastly, he suggests that we should rethink about the facts that we believe to be true and should not be dependence on them. In conclusion, Carroll argues that we need to understand that our brain can be controlled by external factors; however, we should be able to avoid it. Information, reports and news are helpful and useful. In contrast, they are also tricky sometimes because they have the power to control people so that here are actually many people are living based on them. I think that is wrong, and I also think that is a kind of brainwash. I believe we need to know how to live in the information-oriented society. …show more content…

I always feel “Why should I?” I have heard that organic food is good because no chemical in it, but honestly I don’t care. I believe the important point of eating healthy is how you eat not what you eat. It is extreme to stop eating not organic food after knowing it is bad for our health. In my opinion, researchers reveal their research to make the world better not to make a ceiling. However, some people say that it has proven that organic food is better, and what has proven is always true. I agree with this, but this is also true that new research that contradicts the latest one can be discovered in the future. This is the reason why I think we should not be persistent. This can lead your life

Open Document