Jill Filipovic Argument

985 Words2 Pages

Corey Skeldon
Ms. Alyesse Orr
English 103
14 September 2015
“The Pope’s Unforgiving Message of Forgiveness on Abortion” In her article, “The Pope’s Unforgiving Message of Forgiveness on Abortion,” Jill Filipovic argued that the Pope’s announcement that women who have aborted fetuses will be given forgiveness during the churches Holy Year of Mercy is actually an act of cruelty rather than mercy. Although Jill Filipovic presented sufficient evidence to support her position, she did have biases and other aspects of her writing that also weakened her argument. Throughout the article Filipovic employed emotional appeals, logical appeals, and emotionally charged diction to strengthen her argument. On the other hand Filipovic also displayed clear …show more content…

Filipovic offered, “…research shows that a vast majority of women who terminate pregnancies in the United States don’t actually feel bad about it” (Filipovic, page #). Instead of simply stating that research proved this, she sourced where she got her information and provided a link directly to the website providing this information, in this case being plos.org. By doing so, she is not only appealing to the reader in a logical way, she is actually bolstering her credibility by citing a respected source of information. Filipovic continued with her point that the existence of a rule that threatens the excommunication of a woman who chooses to terminate her pregnancy actually illuminates their stance on women’s rights. The author pointed, “Inviting women to feel shame and guilt for their abortions isn’t a mercy; it’s cruelty” (page #). Her deliberate use of the words “shame”, “guilt”, and “cruelty” invoke a feeling of outrage and unjustness in the minds of her viewers. Thus this direct use emotionally charged diction, helps further Filipovic’s position against the Pope’s message of supposed mercy. Jill Filipovic also addresses any counterarguments to her claims when she says “Which doesn’t mean some women don’t feel very real guilt or regret around abortion; for some women, post …show more content…

While this statement would seem to support her argument that the church is offering this year of mercy as a tactic to support the anti-abortion cause, she actually hindered her argument because she didn’t support this claim with any evidence to support its validity. By failing to do so, she lost credibility with her audience. In the paragraph following that statement, she again weakened her argument when she pointed, “According to the mercy narrative, entirely normal and common reproductive choices are actually tragedies in which women are ignorant dupes manipulated by doctors or unsupportive partners” (page #). In this statement the author showed clear signs of bias, in her evaluation of abortion as an “entirely normal and common” practice. While I may agree with her point of view, many readers would not, and by stating this she is clearly not appealing to the demographic of her audience who disagree. In this same sentence she is again using emotionally charged diction when she refers to women being seen as “ignorant dupes”. By doing the author was able to evoke a feeling of outrage in her female readers especially, again furthering her point of

Open Document