Theologians been able to demonstrate that Jesus got resurrected the 3rd day because of the empty tomb, resurrection appearances, origin of christian faith. The empty tomb was a big part of the resurrection of Jesus because he was not found in the tomb. The resurrection appearances are significant evidence aswell because there were sightings of Jesus after he was buried and not in his tomb. The origin Of Christian faith is a big part in the authenticity of the whole resurrection event.
The empty tomb was one of the biggest if not the biggest part of the resurrection. The Empty tomb signifies that there was a high chance Jesus christ did in fact resurrect on the 3rd day. “If the empty tomb story were a legend, then it is most likely that the
…show more content…
This shows that the disciples did not make this up because they were jesus followers but that the common people of Jerusalem saw first who had no bias on Jesus. The first part of evidence that Jesus was not in the tomb was when the massive stone was moved from the entrance to his tomb. The stone could not have been moved by 1 mortal person because it weighed so much. It is said that the stone weighed 1-2 tons! John 19:39-42 says “39He was accompanied by Nicodemus, the man who earlier had visited Jesus at night. Nicodemus brought a mixture of myrrh and aloes, about seventy-five pounds.e 40Taking Jesus’ body, the two of them wrapped it, with the spices, in strips of linen. This was in accordance with Jewish burial customs. 41At the place where Jesus was crucified, there was a garden, and in the garden a new tomb, in which no one had ever been laid. 42Because it was the Jewish day …show more content…
It was full of large fish, 153, but even with so many the net was not torn. 12 Jesus said to them, “Come and have breakfast.” None of the disciples dared ask him, “Who are you?” They knew it was the Lord.13 Jesus came, took the bread and gave it to them, and did the same with the fish. This part from the Bible shows that Jesus was seen in another state by his disciples but different ones this time. Mary also had no contact with Simon, Peter, Thomas, Nathanael, the sons of Zebedee, and the two other disciples. Immediately when Peter did what the man at shore who was Jesus said he knew right away it was him. This sighting is significant because it shows jesus was not only in jerusalem during this time and was seen by people who knew him before so could prove that it was him and not an impersonator. The disciples were also very well respected because of their honesty. The disciples were known not to
I found that there are lots of facts and conversation that tell people resurrection of
The book of Matthew talks about Jesus walking on the water. There are a few ways that people explain the passage. Some people try to explain away the miracle. We are going to discuss both these ways.
First, Jesus’ resurrection matters because it allows us to trust in Him. He told His disciples of events that would happen to Him surrounding His crucifixion, including that on the third day, He would rise again (Matthew 20:17-19 TLB). Therefore, the resurrection validated the claim that Jesus was who He proclaimed He was — God in human form. While His opponents knew that if His resurrection were authentic, it would bear out Jesus’ claim to be God in human form; they, therefore, concocted several theories to explain the missing body, all to no avail. Hence, Christians trust Jesus — His prophecies came true.
But there are various theories attempting to explain the event. In the Enlightenment period, David Strauss developed a radical new approach to the resurrection of Jesus, explaining it was a “subjective conception in the mind” of the disciples (McGrath, 2001, 399). Strauss’ theory suggests the disciples did not witness a life physically restored, but saw a projection of Jesus living in the presence of their memories (Luke 24:39-49). As a result of this, he referred to the Biblical account of resurrection as “a reflection of the gospel writers’ social conditioning and cultural outlook” (McGrath, 2001, 399).
The resurrection of Jesus is a topic in Christian Apologetic that confirms the faith of a believer. Groothuis submits, “Of all the world’s religions Christianity alone purports to be based on the resurrection of its divine founder. No other religion or worldview makes such an audacious and consequential claim. Throughout the Gospels, Jesus himself predicts his own betrayal, death and resurrection.”1 The Bible reveals the importance of the resurrection in Corinthians 15:14-17, “And if Christ wasn’t raised to life, our message is worthless, and so is your faith. If the dead won’t be raised to life, we have told lies about God by saying that he raised Christ to life, when he really did not. So if the dead won’t be raised to life, Christ wasn’t raised to life. Unless Christ was raised to life, your faith is useless, and you are still living in your sins.”
There are six hypotheses that have been created to disprove that Jesus rose from the dead. Four of them assume the vacancy of the tomb as a historic fact, while the others take the extreme side of the story. The first is, Joseph of Arimathea secretly moved the body and the second is that the body was removed by the Roman Power. The third is that the body was removed by the Jewish authorities to prevent the possible veneration of the tomb. Fourth is Jesus’s life was not really extinct and the fifth is the woman mistook the grave in the uncertain light.
I know who you are—the Holy One of God?’” and again in 3:11, “whenever the impure spirits saw him, they fell down before him and cried out, ‘You are the Son of God’”. The disciples are ignorant to fact that the man who called them to drop everything and follow him was the Messiah. Peter properly identifies Jesus in chapter 8 when Jesus asks who they believe he is, but later when Jesus goes into the details of his death Peter denies it and Jesus addresses him as Satan. This is also the point in which Jesus says, “take up your cross and follow me” meaning that they too will
When Jesus visited Jerusalem around 29 AD, he found enthusiastic crowds greeting him as the messiah. However he was arrested for not worshiping pagan Roman gods and was sentenced to death on a cross. While he was hanging awaiting death he forgave those who had killed him and those who had worshipped him the day before were denying him. After his crucifixion he was placed in a tomb, on the third day he rose, and greeted his followers, further convincing them that he was the messiah.
John was one of the first twelve disciples of Jesus and therefore an eye-witness (John 19:35); John brings out the spiritual significance as well as recording the practical aspects of Jesus' works and words. John lived to be older than any of the other writers. It is therefore likely that he was familiar with their accounts and wanted to supplement theirs with additional teaching and miracles by Jesus which had a bearing on the situation towards the end of the first century AD.
...rdance with the scriptures, and that he was buried, and that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the scriptures”.
There is only solid evidence for the legitament resurrection of Jesus Christ. Any arguments against it do not hold weight and can be easily refuted. Logical reasoning leads to the truth of the empty tomb and risen Christ.
These three tests when applied to the Bible show it as the most historically reliable text known to man, thus the events found upon the pages of the Bible are actual historically proven events. In light of these facts, there are still many theories other than that of the Biblical account. Three of them include the "Visionary" theory, the theft theory, and the wrong tomb theory. The first theory is that of Strauss, that the appearances of Jesus after His death on the cross were "visions generated by the imaginations of the disciples (Ramsey 48)." This may be the easiest of all the theories to discredit. First of all, it does not take into account the inability of the disciples to grasp this idea that Christ was alive and to recognize Him for who He was (Ramsey 48).
the crucifixion and the burial took place, afterward Jesus removed the big stone and went on his
From the women we learn that Jesus rose on the first day of the week. From the other disciples, we learn that Jesus rose on the third day. If the resurrection of Jesus was nothing but a hoax or urban legend, there would not be an identifiable starting point. This is not the case for the resurrection. We know the location he was buried and the time span in which it happened.
One of the most perplexing events in the ministry of Jesus Christ is His resurrection from the dead. Many skeptics look at it as made up stories or hallucinations, or mass hysteria, yet the biblical accounts and other evidence point to another conclusion. This research paper will explore three pieces of evidence that the resurrection story is factual and can be accepted as a historical event. The first evidence of Jesus’ resurrection: the stone was rolled away and the tomb was empty. John (20:1) reports that Mary Magdalene came early to the tomb “and saw the stone taken away from the tomb.”