Jean Kirkpatrick: Machiavellian Wonderwoman

1027 Words3 Pages

Jean Kirkpatrick: Machiavellian Wonderwoman

In 1979 Jean Kirkpatrick published Dictatorships And Double Standards, an article dealing with U.S. foreign policy under Jimmy Carter, including policy toward the Sandinistas in Nicaragua. Kirkpatrick argues that Carter “abhors only right wing autocrats” ((43) and that he ignores the primary goal in foreign policy which should be U.S. interests. In her world view, the end justifies the means and stability should be sought over any sentimental notions about democracy for, or sovereignty of foreign nations. She argues that Latin America is not fertile for democracy and that, in the long run, supporting right wing dictatorships will lead to a better chance at this goal, to be achieved at a later date. In her Machiavellian prescription for Nicaragua she downplays the horrors of Somoza and misrepresents the character of the Sandinista revolution. The violence that occurred under the Reagan administration in the eighties can be seen as the realization of the Kirkpatrick school of thought and the results were extremely negative for Nicaragua.

Kirkpatrick is unimpressed with the Sandinistas who she claims did not have the support of the people. She states that it was erroneous for the Carter administration to believe “there existed at the moment of crisis a democratic alternative to the incumbent government” (36). But the Sandinistas were easily victorious in open and fair elections in 1984 (which were approved by numerous observers from all over the world). It is also worth wondering what a “democratic alternative” is when the party in power is a brutally repressive family dynasty that did not allow elections and had ruled Nicaragua for forty-three years. To Kirkpatrick “...

... middle of paper ...

...or example) her assertion does not hold up.

So when the question is asked: “Why would Kirkpatrick support the harassment and overthrow of popular governments and support right wing authoritarian regimes who keep order by use of deathsquads?” the answer can’t be, as she claims, that they offer the best hope for eventual democracy in said country. To her “U.S. interests” are the only criteria that matter, specifically the interests of corporations and elites. This of course shows her disdain for the democratic process not only in countries that should know their place, but also here in the U.S.. Surely, she can’t believe that the majority of the American public would agree with her if they knew the facts.

Bibliographical note: Besides the two assigned readings I used the following book:

Blum,William. Killing Hope. Monroe: Common Courage Press, 1995.

The Farmers' Revolt
732 Words | 2 Pages
High prices forced farmers to concentrate on one crop. The large-scale farmers bought expensive machines, increasing their crop yield. This caused the smaller farmers to be left behind. The small farmers could no longer compete and were forced give up their farms and look for jobs in the cities. The smaller farmers who stayed blamed their troubles on banks and railroads. In the 1890’s western and southern farmers came together to make up the political party called the Populist Party. Their plan was to take control of the White House; then they could solve all their problems.
Read More
Changes in America's Agriculture From 1865-1900
802 Words | 2 Pages
Through the period of 1865-1900, America’s agriculture underwent a series of changes .Changes that were a product of influential role that technology, government policy and economic conditions played. To extend on this idea, changes included the increase on exported goods, do the availability of products as well as the improved traveling system of rail roads. In the primate stages of these developing changes, farmers were able to benefit from the product, yet as time passed by, dissatisfaction grew within them. They no longer benefited from the changes (economy went bad), and therefore they no longer supported railroads. Moreover they were discontented with the approach that the government had taken towards the situation.
Read More
Troubles for Farmers in the 19th Century
841 Words | 2 Pages
To sum it all up, the agrarian society was threatened by the low prices of crops, monopolies and trusts, railroad companies, and banks. During the last twenty years of the 19th century, farmers started speaking out against these problems and parties such as the Populist Party came into existence. The complaints by farmers were justified because farmers could barely make a profit and any money that they did have would go to the railroad companies for transporting crops or banks to pay off the loans.
Read More
CIA's Intervention In Guatemala
2741 Words | 6 Pages
Immerman, Richard. The CIA in Guatemala the foreign policy of intervention. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1985.
Read More
Farming in 19th Century America
992 Words | 2 Pages
Evidently, during the 1870-1900 period, farmers expressed drastic discontent in which their attitudes and actions had a major impact on national politics. First and foremost, farmers began to feel that their lives were threatened by competition with railroads, monopolies, trusts, currency circulation shortage, and the desire for Mother Nature to destroy their crops. The majority of the people of America were slaves, and monopoly was the master (Document C). Monopolies were dictating the way the agricultural industry functioned as a whole. Additionally, the deflation of prices was particularly crucial, because it put the farmers in a high state of debt. Furthermore, competition was another major contributing factor liable for the farmers’ dissatisfaction.
Read More
Agrarian Woes in the Late 19th Century
855 Words | 2 Pages
... American agrarian empire was defeated by railroads issuing rebates and drawbacks, foreign competition, and a booming population that pushed the farmers west to a point that arid conditions strangled profits. However, in some cases, these farmers complaints were not justified. Many of the threats farmers thought monopolies posed to them, such as the idea of unfair and unreasonable price increases, rarely were a reality. The debate between silver and gold also proved to be unrelated to the farmers troubles, as silver couldn’t serve as the means to end deflation and lower crop values. Although the farmers did manage to bring politics closer to the people, and politicians face to face with the problems of the country, they failed to preserve their lifestyle, resulting in the world we live in today, where the distance from the farm to the dinner table continues to grow.
Read More
Agrarian Discontent 1880 To 1900
1453 Words | 3 Pages
The period between 1880 and 1900 was a boom time for American Politics. The country was finally free of the threat of war, and many of its citizens were living comfortably. However, as these two decades went by, the American farmer found it harder and harder to live comfortably. Crops such as cotton and wheat, once the sustenance of the agriculture industry, were selling at prices so low that it was nearly impossible for farmers to make a profit off them. Furthermore, improvement in transportation allowed foreign competition to materialize, making it harder for American farmers to dispose of surplus crop. Mother Nature was also showing no mercy with grasshoppers, floods, and major droughts that led to a downward spiral of business that devastated many of the nation’s farmers. As a result of the agricultural depression, numerous farms groups, most notably the Populist Party, arose to fight what the farmers saw as the reasons for the decline in agriculture. During the final twenty years of the nineteenth century, many farmers in the United States saw monopolies and trusts, railroads, and money shortages and the loss in value of silver as threats to their way of life, all of which could be recognized as valid complaints.
Read More
Essay On Farming In The 1920's
574 Words | 2 Pages
The twenties brought a great shift for framing, overreaching during the war causing severe economic circumstances for farmers. The war was the first time in American history that many farmers were not growing for subsistence, but instead they were growing on a production scale for the war. Since the first humans began to rely on agriculture 10,000 years ago, farming has always been used as a form of subsistence, growing what a family needed to survive, and selling any extra you managed to grow. Humans require a variety of foods and cannot only live on a single crop. This meant the c...
Read More
The Pros And Cons Of Youth Gun Violence
1012 Words | 3 Pages
When there is a negative, there will always be a positive. When youth go through those means of learning how to fully operate a gun, they can know what will not be in their best interest. Gun advocates generally believe that youth gun violence is a problem rooted in culture, not in access to guns.” (Public Perspectives) When you watch the news, more often than not, the misuse of guns is demographically placed in areas of the country that is focused on something
Read More
Farmers Discontent Dbq
658 Words | 2 Pages
Farmer’s discontent during the period 1870 – 1900 had an impact on their attitudes and actions towards politics. During this period manufacturing had a growth spurt and agricultural started to decline. This made it harder for the farmers to make a decent living. For example in document G it shows how much manufacturing increased between the 50 years. America could no longer dream to be a nation of small freehold farms. Manufacturers and people living in big cities depended on farmers to supply everything. Many people didn’t realize how much of an affect farmers had on their lives. If somebody was to take farms away, everything would have completely crashed.
Read More
Farming during the late nineteenth century
1156 Words | 3 Pages
Farmers everywhere in the United States during the late nineteenth century had valid reasons to complaint against the economy because the farmers were constantly being taken advantage of by the railroad companies and banks. All farmers faced similar problems and for one thing, farmers were starting to become a minority within the American society. In the late nineteenth century, industrialization was in the spotlight creating big businesses and capitals. The success of industrialization put agriculture and farmers on the down low, allowing the corporations to overtake the farmers. Since the government itself; such as the Republican Party was also pro-business during this time, they could have cared less about the farmers.
Read More
The Stubborness of Okonkwo
389 Words | 1 Pages
Okonkwo was deeply grieved. And it was not just a personal grief. He mourned for the clan, which he saw breaking up and falling apart, and he mourned for the warlike men of Umofia, Who had so unaccountably become soft like women.
Read More
Agrarian Discontent in the Late Nineteenth Century
1288 Words | 3 Pages
Most of the reasons concerning agrarian discontent in the late nineteenth century stem from supposed threats posed by monopolies and trusts, railroads, money shortages and the demonetization of silver, though in many cases their complaints were not valid. The American farmer at this time already had his fair share of problems, perhaps even perceived as unfair in regards to the success industrialized businessmen were experiencing. Nevertheless, crops such as cotton and wheat, which were once the staples of an agricultural society, were selling at such low prices that it was nearly impossible for farmers to make a profit off them, especially since some had invested a great deal of money in modern equipment that would allow them to produce twice as many goods. Furthermore, improvements in transportation allowed foreign competition to emerge, making it harder for American Farmers to not only dispose of surplus crop, but to transport crops period. Finally, years of drought in the Midwest and the degeneration of business in the 1890's devastated many of the nation's farmers, and as a result of this agricultural depression' many farm groups, most notably the Populist Party, arose to fight what farmers saw as the reasons for the decline of agriculture.
Read More
Farmers And Farmers Essay
677 Words | 2 Pages
Businesses prospered near the late nineteenth century. Many monopolies, centralized banks, and trust were produced due to this industrialization rush. Standard Oil company, Carnegie Steel company and other large vicious companies dominated not only laborers and farmers, but the governors and their regulations. There was a deep strive for efficiency and effectively making a profit only to their benefit, leaving other classes to fall apart. Farmers were the most endangered group of citizens. These businesses and corporations found ways to manipulate the government ridding of competition for farmers. Farmers feared for their production and consumer production. With the lack of competition and prices of their products through the roof, consumer will not be able to purchase items and farmers will not make a profit from what th...
Read More
Democracy in Latin America
2755 Words | 6 Pages
Much G. L., 2004, Democratic Politics in Latin America: New Debates and Research Frontiers, Annual Reviews
Read More

Open Document

Wait a second!

Jean Kirkpatrick: Machiavellian Wonderwoman

The Farmers' Revolt

Changes in America's Agriculture From 1865-1900

Troubles for Farmers in the 19th Century

CIA's Intervention In Guatemala

Farming in 19th Century America

Agrarian Woes in the Late 19th Century

Agrarian Discontent 1880 To 1900

Essay On Farming In The 1920's

The Pros And Cons Of Youth Gun Violence

Farmers Discontent Dbq

Farming during the late nineteenth century

The Stubborness of Okonkwo

Agrarian Discontent in the Late Nineteenth Century

Farmers And Farmers Essay

Democracy in Latin America

More about Jean Kirkpatrick: Machiavellian Wonderwoman