The author of the first reading Nicholas Carr and the author of Twain’s Life on the Mississippi our second reading and our final reading on Ralph Waldo Emerson of Nature. The first author trying to say that technology has an influence on you. The second author trying to say that not only technology have an influence on you, people also do too. The third author says that stuff around you have an influence on too. I agree with the authors that stuff like technology, people, nature, and everything else has an influence on our daily lives and us.
The difference between the first author’s thoughts and the second author’s thoughts. The author of “Is Google making us stupid?” thoughts is that technology has an influence on us. Some example the author use are the clock, typewriter, and read for a long period. The author thought on the clock is that the clock affect when we do stuff, for example when to eat and do other stuffs. A quote from the text,” As the late MIT computer scientist Joseph
…show more content…
One of Nietzsche’s friends, a composer, noticed a change in the style of his writing. His already terse prose had become even tighter, more telegraphic.”(Carr 95) In the quote above, describe the pro and con of the typewriter. The positive are that it is helping Friedrich Nietzche with his writing and the negative side is that it is affecting Friedrich Nietzche writing style. “I’m not the only one. When I mention my troubles with reading to
In Emerson’s article, Nature, the passage shows great value of how man and nature can be similar. The article shows in many ways how man can represent nature, and how nature can represent everything. Emerson’s Nature can be related to Guy Montag’s journey into nature in Fahrenheit 451, and the author’s ways of showing similarity between man and vegetable can be presented as showing how nature is mixed in with literature and humans.
Throughout the book, Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, dependency on technology becomes a relevant topic. In the novel, Bradbury depicts that people are obsessed with their technology and have become almost completely dependent on it. Characters such as Mildred exist in today’s modern world and show a perfect example of how society behaves. In today’s society, people use their technology for just about everything: from auto correct to automatic parallel parking; as time goes by people do less manually and let their appliances do the work.
Advancements in technology have strived to make life easier for so many people. In most cases, the advancements have achieved its goal, but in the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Nicholas Carr questions if the improvements in society have unintentionally hindered our thought process overall. Carr begins the article by providing personal instances when his concentration seemed to diminish due to the internet. He explains how he now loses interest when reading lengthy portions, his mind just can’t seem to remain connected to his readings. He then proceeds to talk about how today’s life is surrounded by the internet, and explains the pros and cons of it. The negative side of it is that his mind now wonders off when seeking information from
“ Persuasion is clearly a sort of demonstration, since we are most fully persuaded when we consider a thing to have been demonstrated” (Aristotle). In the essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid” Nicholas Carr presents a compelling argument in which he supports with Aristotle’s three styles for effective argumentation (logos, pathos, and ethos). Nicholas Carr appeals to the reader’s logic and reasoning, the reader’s emotion, and builds credibility within his essay. He exercises several effective writing strategies to strengthen his argument in the essay.
In doing so, he ensures that the readers walk away from his writing thinking of the unnecessarity of technology and how it distracts one from nature. He encourages the reader to think about what they can do to minimize the amount of technology in their life so they may be more attuned to nature. In short, Robert Louv wisely uses rhetorical devices to form a persuasive
He is concerned that humans will lose their individuality and lose who they are. He also fears that humans will lose the ability to think deeper than the surface. Technology has a huge impact on the human race according to Gladwell and Carr; they argue that technology is supposed to be a positive thing to this generation, and even the future, but technology is actually impacting us in a negative way. We have lost so many things due to the advancements in technology that we have made over the years. These losses include the ability to use technology efficiently and the loss of human connection. They also provide recommendations about what they think their peers can do to fix this mess they believe in.
Author Nicholas Carr’s article “Is Google making us Stupid,” discusses how the use of the computer affects our thought process. Carr starts out talking about his own experience as a writer and how he felt like “something had been tinkering with his brain, remapping his neural circuitry and reprogramming his memory”(313). Basically, he is acknowledging that since he started using the Internet his research techniques have changed. Carr believes that before he would immerse himself in books, lengthy articles and long stretches of prose allowing his mind to get caught up in the narrative or the
Throughout the other chapters, Emerson explores the idea of nature as instructor to man and how man can learn from nature. He repeatedly says that nature is a divine creation of God and through it man can learn to be closer to god. However, despite the reverence, awe, and prerequisite mental status, he also presents the concept of nature being 'below' and man on a 'Scala Natura ' of sorts. Although man seen as connected to and part of nature, for he questions if we can "separate the man from the living picture" of nature (26), he finds that nature is nothing without human interpretation because "All facts in natural history taken by themselves have not value . . .. but marry it to human history, and it is full of life," (33). However, there appears to be some more complicated interactions between nature and humans because human language, arguably one of the most important inventions/discoveries in our history is immediately dependent on nature (35). In a chapter titled Discipline, Emerson states that 'nature is thoroughly mediate. It is made to serve," (45). Emerson believes that the human form is superior to all other organizations which appear to be degradations of it (50).
Ray Bradbury thinks the presence of technology creates lifestyle with too much stimulation that makes people do not want to think. Technology distract us from people living a life in nature. Clarisse describes to Montag of what her uncle said to her about his ol' days. " not front porches my uncle says. There used to be front porches. And people sat their sometimes at night, talking when they did want to talk and not talking when they didn't want to talk. Sometimes they just sat there and thought about things over." (Bradbury 63) Clarisse goes on to tell Montag that, "The archiets got rid of the front porches because they didn't look well. But my uncle says that was merely rationalization it; the real reason hidden underneath might be they didn't want people the wrong kind of social life. People talked too much. And they had time to think. So they ran off with porches." (Bradbury 63) this explain how in...
Our environment only has the power over us that we allow it to have. Our environment does not affect all of us equally, because those who are less privileged are more susceptible to environmental influences because they lack the ability to overcome the effects of the economic environment. Emerson’s “Self-Reliance” states that children are also less susceptible to environmental influences and are more self-reliant because they are too young to be hesitant or hypocritical, “Infancy conforms to nobody” (269). I believe technological environment forces most significantly shape our lives because technology is something that we are in contact with at every second of the day and as seen in “Super Sad True Love Story” if we put all our energy into technology it can be wiped away and we are rendered helpless like Lenny after the Rupture, “My apparat isn’t connecting. I can’t connect. No one’s apparati are working anymore” (268). With that being said, I believe we should be somewhat resistant of this advancing environment or at least cautious. Physical environment is inevitable and can’t be changed, so I don’t think that is something that should be considered as a major influence on shaping our lives. Our family and cultural
He states how he used to spend hours reading, but his concentration started to drift after two or three pages. He backed up his theory with stories from others who say they’re experiencing the same thing. But they still await the long-term neurological and psychological experiments that will provide a definitive picture of how the internet affects cognition. After a brief history lesson, Carr starts to incorporate Google into the article. He tells us about Google’s history and their mission.
My only contention with the author’s point of view is that technology is not the only culprit. The only thing we can truly blame technology for is enhancing our true
Nicholas Carr’s “Is Google Making Us Stupid” and Sherry Turkle’s “How Computers Change the Way We Think” both discuss the influence of technology to their own understanding and perspective. The first work by Nicholas Carr is about the impact technology has on his mind. He is skeptical about the effect it could cause in the long term of it. He gives credible facts and studies done to prove his point. While Sherry Turkle’s work gives a broad idea of the impact of technology has caused through the years. She talks about the advances in technology and how it is changing how people communicate, learn and think. In both works “Is Google Making Us Stupid” and “How Computers Change the Way We Think” the authors present
The Industrial Revolution of the 19th century brought about profound changes in transportation, technology, and economics. Members of society reaped tremendous benefits from the abundance of innovations that arose during the period. The invention of new machinery paved the way for mass production, and allowed once burdensome tasks to be accomplished quickly. at record speeds. Yet certain individuals became skeptical of the consequences of such rapid development. Numerous artists, writers and philosophers, worried that induexstrialization would destroy the connection of humankind to the natural world. American poets such as Henry David Thoreau, began to praise nature as a source of healthy emotions, ideas and morality. By contrast, they condemned
Ralph Waldo Emerson							I am writing this essay on the beliefs and thoughts of Ralph Waldo Emerson on the subjects of individuality, society, government, technology, and spirituality.