Is Democracy Wagged As A Government?

504 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Capitalism and democracy similarities

If we loosely define democracy as a government “by the people for the people”, then we can see that a capitalist economy seems to contradict this notion of democracy. In a capitalistic economy, the owners of a company or corporation are in charge of making all of the production-based decisions. These decisions included things like what is produced and how it is produced, how much the good or service will cost, the wages of the employees, etc. Often times, these owners make these decisions without giving much regard to the interests of its employees or to the implications that these decisions have on the people and communities affected by these decisions. In this system, there is no individual influence for the workers. Instead, they simply …show more content…

Although capitalism may lead to a more efficient allocation of resources, it also leads to an exploitation of the middle class and a skewing of the underlying democratic system that capitalism is based on. In a perfectly democratic society, the workers in this capitalist setting could utilize the democratic mechanisms (elections) set in place to create external forces that would cause corporations to satisfy their workers’ interests. However, with capitalism still in place, these mechanisms are corrupted due to disproportionate amount of resources and money that corporations have compared to the citizens of the working class. Politicians need tons of money and resources in order to secure an election and where is the best place to tap into these resources? Capitalist corporations supply these politicians with all they need and thus gain an ever greater influence and access to controlling the working class through creating laws and regulations that are designed to benefit the minority of big-wig capitalists over the majority of the population that can be found in the working class. In a perfectly democratic society (as impossible as that sounds), capitalism would not have the ability to obstruct the power of a democratic system that is designed to govern in a way that is truly “for the

Show More
Related

  • Mead And Marx's View On Human Nature

    1311 Words  | 3 Pages

    Coined by Marx, the bourgeois are “the exploiting and ruling class…”, and the proletariats are “the exploited and oppressed class” (Marx, 207). These two classes are separated because of the machine we call capitalism. Capitalism arises from private property, specialization of labor, wage labor, and inevitably causes competition. “The need of a constantly expanding market for its products (…) chases the bourgeois over the whole surface of the globe” (Marx, 212) and creates a world that cannot exist without the separation of workers and owners and competition for the lowest price. The struggle between the

    Read More

  • Power Struggles in Capitalist Democracies and the Fate of American Labor Unions

    3479 Words  | 7 Pages

    As Joshua Cohen and Joel Rogers articulated in On Democracy, a capitalist democracy is one that "if [it] is not just capitalism, still less is it just democracy" (Cohen 50). Indeed, despite the apparent political equality in a system that nowadays guarantees universal suffrage, the dominate socio-political structure in the United States and most western European countries does not allow—neither by intention nor in practice—free and equal competition between the capital and labor. Cohen and Rogers theorize that at the heart of this disparity lies what they call "the demand constraint" and "the resource constraint". In summation, the demand constraint states that because of the fact that the entire capitalistic econom...

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Karl Marx's Writing Of The Communist Manifesto

    2472 Words  | 5 Pages

    Most importantly for those who Marx feels capitalism has an adverse effect on, the proletariat. Marx in The Communist Manifesto explains what capitalism is and what it is to be a capitalist: "To be a capitalist is to have not only a purely personal but a social status in production. Capital is a collective product, and only by the united action of many members, nay, in the last resort, only by the united action of all members of society, can it be set in motion." (Marx, K., Engels, F. and Berman, M. (2011)). Through such a definition of capitalism, he adamantly stresses that capitalist state is selfish, one that has been manufactured by the desire of individuals to have a greater material wealth than his societal

    Read More

  • Are Democracy and Capitalism Compatible

    2012 Words  | 5 Pages

    One of the scholars who didn’t support the idea of a mergence between capitalism and democracy was the famous Karl Marx, who thought that it either wouldn’t happen or if it did it would have evaporated quickly. In his work he portrayed his opinion on capitalist democracy as ‘only the political form of revolution of bourgeois society and not its conservative form of life.” On the arena of politics it appears to be that there are numerous moments of clashes between both the economic ideology capitalism and the political ideology democracy and this is an opinion stated by various scholars including Karl Marx. According t...

    Read More

  • Karl Marx's Kapital

    1075 Words  | 3 Pages

    When one gets down to the roots of capitalism you find that it is a form of government that allows the rich to get richer, the poor, poorer and the middle class to stay the same. Karl Marx wrote a book, Kapital about the what capitalism does to the people in a society, how it takes the humainty out of being and replaces it with x. Not only does it do that but it creates a chain of commodities, fetishisis, and alienation within a society.

    Read More

  • Economic Systems: Capitalism

    1104 Words  | 3 Pages

    Capitalism is an economic system where people and private businesses are able to control their own trade and means of production for profit. It emerged as technology, production and trade began to increase. During the industrial revolution, capitalism started to influence people more. Some characteristics of capitalism are capital accumulation, competitive markets and wage labor. The government isn’t supposed to interfere with trade. Individual markets raise or lower their prices due to competition and demand for goods. There has been a lot of debate over the usefulness of capitalism. Some believed capitalism had negative effects while others saw more benefits. Adam Smith and Andrew Carnegie pushed for a capitalistic society, but had different beliefs on how economic wealth should be distributed; Karl Marx advocated for a communistic society where wealth was evenly distributed.

    Read More

  • Capitalism in the US

    705 Words  | 2 Pages

    Capitalism is what made our country strong, and it needs to be protected from its enemies. The study of capitalism reveals that this type of system inspires creative thinking and rewards successful innovation financially. This drives the economy forward in an excellent way. In his article, Arthur Brooks makes a strong argument which validates the need for free enterprise to remain unrestricted, and free to execute business unfettered (Brooks 545). He points to the intentions of our government, in its infancy, by quoting Thomas Jefferson, in regard to our economic system. Jefferson said at his first inaugural address "A wise and frugal government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of bread it has earned" (qtd. in Brooks 545). In contrast, socialism is a system that advocates the control of production and distribution, of capital, and land. Socialism is more closely related to a command system, such as communism, than it is to capitalism. Communism distributes wealth equally to all. Robin hood is a fascinating tale that can be a demonstration of communism. Take from the rich and give it to the poor. Most people do not consider themselves to be wealthy. That is because it is human nature to alway...

    Read More

  • Explain The Red Scare In America After World War I

    1362 Words  | 3 Pages

    Capitalism is an economic and political system where a country's trade and industry is controlled by private owners in order to have a profit, rather than controlled by the government/state.

    Read More

  • Jonah Goldberg's Capitalism Has Lifted Billions Out Of Poverty

    718 Words  | 2 Pages

    The inequity of this system is what results in the powerlessness of those in poverty, who find themselves unable to challenge those in power. Marx perhaps best envisioned this in his concept of a class struggle between the proletariat (working class) and bourgeoisie (owners of the means of production), and proposed socialism as an alternative economic system. As the wage gap increases, those in poverty have less “money”, the negotiation tool in capitalist systems, to fight for themselves. Capitalism has also always been entwined with democracy, yet this is not a symbiotic relationship.

    Read More

  • Karl Marx Father Of Capitalism

    1172 Words  | 3 Pages

    Marx is able to demonstrate the consequences that result from transforming values into productions suited for profit, as he writes, “This boundless greed after riches, this passionate chase after exchange-value is common to the capitalist and the miser; but while the miser is merely a capitalist gone mad, the capitalist is a rational miser” (Marx 63). There is no sense of abhorrence for a particular individual in Marx’s interpretation of capitalism and instead focuses on the capitalistic economic structure. However, it is through this quote that a sense of inequality starts to emerge. As a result, a hierarchy is produced, creating an enduring structure of capitalism, where those who control the circulation of money are granted unlimited power. This has become evident in recent years, as in 2008, a social power analysis by Dr. John S. Atlee and Tom Atlee was published. In “Democracy: A Social Power Analysis” Altlee describes the power of money and status as he states, “People with lots of money, muscle, status, intelligence, etc., can usually successfully influence other people. In most (but, significantly, not all) circumstances, they have more social power” (Atlee). Economic power is proven to be pivotal in attaining another individual’s attention and status of capability. Thus, the capitalist is free to develop their own sense of

    Read More

  • Karl Marx and a Capitalist Society

    754 Words  | 2 Pages

    Through out history money, wealth and capital have dictated a way of life to the masses. Wealth dictated the lives that the rich lived and the lives of the poor that worked for and surrounded them. In some cultures your class could never be escaped in life, you had to wait for your next incarnation, while in other cultures the idea of wealth transcended a life and allowed for growth from one class to another. This is the reality of a capitalist society that was first discussed by Karl Marx in the 19th century.

    Read More

  • Capitalism vs Communism

    661 Words  | 2 Pages

    Contrary to widely held beliefs, capitalism is not a system which exploits a large portion of society for the sake of a small minority. Capitalism is an economic system characterized by the freedom of the market with increasing concentration of the private and corporate ownership of production and distribution means. It has an stable economic system in that it is consistent with human behavior. People understand that there is no such this as free lunch. You have to work to survive and only those who do will prosper within the system and make it to the top. People are motivated to work as hard as they possibly can because they know that the harder they work the more benefits they will be ale to reap. As written in On Liberty “These are not questions of liberty….but they are questions of development” (Mill)

    Read More

  • Capitalism: Good or Evil?

    1868 Words  | 4 Pages

    Capitalism is currently one of the two major economic systems that are being operated among the world. For my interpretation, its basics are privatization and individualism. That is, capitals are privately owned, profit of production is also privatized, and the society exists more on the basis of individuals than of groups. From an economic aspect, we undoubtedly acknowledge that capitalism is making great progress and wealth. As an example, the most powerful country in our time, the United States is a typical capitalist country. Yet, we also cannot deny that this system is causing problems and they are gradually getting widely concerned. Therefore, this controversial issue is often brought into public focus. The question is, is capitalism actually good to keep or it is evil to be replaced?

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Capitalism

    905 Words  | 2 Pages

    Capitalism is an economic system in which the production and distribution are privately owned, the government involvement is minimal,and there is free enterprise. In Capitalism, the means of production are privately owned and operated for profit in a competitive market. Also the economic investment, ownership and profits are all owned by individuals. Under capitalism the state is separated from the economy, which means that the government has no role in business. In other words, everyone works for themselves. The market forces in a capitalist country runs by supply and demand which it determines the price and later on it turns into profits. Supply is the quantity of goods and services a business is willing to sell, while Demand is the quantity of goods and services consumers are willing to buy. Therefore, Capitalism is the best economic system because it rewards the ones that work hard and since the government does not control trade, there is a large variety of goods and creates options for consumers to fit their personal needs.

    Read More

  • Communism Vs Democracy

    534 Words  | 2 Pages

    In a democracy, money is the most dominant incentive. On the contrary, in a communist government, a person can work a million times harder than the person sitting next to him, and receive equal pay. This results in no incentive on the part of the worker whatsoever. When there is nothing to achieve by working harder, people become slothful, which does little good for a country’s economy. In most attempts, past and present, communism has failed economically, whereas democracies have a commendable success rate.

    Read More

More about Is Democracy Wagged As A Government?

Open Document