Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effectivity of the death penalty
The effects of the death penalty
About the death penalty
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effectivity of the death penalty
Such as in the case of Anthony Graves, who was wrongfully convicted of a brutal murder in the year of 1992 and therefore sentenced to death. In fact, Graves had no connection to the crime, including a lack of evidence, no plausible motive, and only one witness to place him at the scene, who turned out to be the actual perpetrator. Overall, a total of eighteen years of Graves’ life was spent behind bars and twelve of them on death row for a crime he had no relation to. Graves was failed by not only the district attorney, but also the entire United States justice system, that didn’t allow him to be innocent until proven guilty. In the case of Cameron Todd Willingham, he was convicted in the year 1992 and executed twelve years later for starting …show more content…
In other words, “Four percent of defendants sentenced to death are innocent” and “If all innocent people who were given death sentences [were] to be cleared of their offenses, the exoneration rate would rise from the actual rate of those released – 1.6% – to at least 4.1%” (Pilkington). Often times in death penalty trials, prosecutors withhold exculpatory information or include false testimonies and unreliable witnesses in order to comply with the public's desire to blame a scapegoat in a timely matter. America’s legal system lacks the ability to function flawlessly on all accounts. Every defendant and every case differentiates in such large extremes that it is impossible for one system of death to justly exist, especially with the state governments abusing their judicial …show more content…
Especially for the protection of law enforcement that is dealing with inmates on death row that can’t be deterred by anything less than the death penalty, it clearly is the only deterrent believed to prevent further crimes (Death Penalty Curriculum). On the contrary, as stated by Dr. Jonathan Groner, "The psychological mindset of the criminal is such that they are not able to consider consequences at the time of the crime. Most crimes are crimes of passion that are done in situations involving intense excitement or concern. People who commit these crimes are not in a normal state of mind -- they do not consider the consequences in a logical way" (Death Penalty Info Center). Thus meaning that individuals in their right mind would fear the thought of death row, but a criminal in the heat of passion cannot be deterred or if the person is thinking irrationally. A deterrent would be more effective if the punishment awarded was both obvious and immediate, unlike month-long trials and years sitting on death
The death penalty is the ultimate warning toward would-be criminals.[4] If a potential criminal knows that the punishment for their actions is going to be death, then fewer criminals will commit the crimes.
There are many different reasons associated with the fact that there are still innocents being convicted with crimes they did not commit. At Northwestern Law School, in 2001, the Center of Wrongful Convictions studied the individual cases of 86 death row exonerees. Five top components were included: eyewitness error, where people have a faulty memory or are confused by the incident. Government misconduct, exemplified by the justice system(both police and the prosecution). Junk science, evidence being mishandled or studied by those who are unqualified in a trade where precision is of the utmost importance. A snitch testimony which is a trick and is normally given to those believing it is a reduction in their sentence. A false confession prompted by a mental illness or of those being clinically retarded, also stemming from police torture. Hearsay and circumstantial evidence also top the list as well.(2) When the irreversible sanc...
or hundreds of years people have considered capital punishment a deterrence of crime. Seven hundred and five individuals have died since 1976, by means of capital punishment; twenty-two of these executions have already occurred this year (Death Penalty Information Center). Many U.S. citizens who strongly support the death penalty believe that capital punishment remains the best way to protect society from convicted killers. I, however, disagree; I do not feel that execution best punishes criminals for their acts. Instead, in my opinion, the administration of the death penalty should end because it does not deter crime; it risks the death of an innocent person, it costs millions of dollars, it inflicts unreasonable pain; and most importantly it violates moral principles.
Many Americans get sentenced to the death penalty, some committing the crime others falsely accused. Capital punishment isn’t legal in all states, but is legal in thirty-two out of the fifty states. In the essay “Death Trip” by Robert Sherrill, covers topics that he feels are important to the people being sentenced to the death penalty. Sherrill starts off by describing his execution it reinforces how inhumane a false death penalty can be. “When Jesse Joseph Tafero was electrocuted in 1990, witnesses said a foot long blue and orange flames shot from the right side of his bobbing head. It took four minutes and three 2,000-volt jolts to finish him off (later, evidence came to light indicating he was innocent of murder).” (14) He starts off by making it clear to everyone that innocent peoples’ lives are taken when wrongly accused. Sherrill also reinforces the fact that innocent people are sentenced to death row by showing statistics. “The kinder polls result from growing awareness that innocent people are probably being executed. After all, eighty-nine people have been released from death row since 1973 because evidence of their innocence has emerged—thirty-eight since 1993. Some of the innocent ones among the thousands now waiting for execution simply won’t have that kind of luck.” (14) He proves that hundreds of people have been released due to evidence proving there innocents.
Recently on February 27, 2014, there has been evidence of a possible execution of an innocent man in Texas. Todd Willingham was convicted of setting his home on fire and murdering family members in 1991 and was executed in 2004. Jailhouse informant Johnny Webb, states in his testimony that this case, “was really based on a deal and misrepresentation …the system cannot be regulated... You cannot prevent the execution of an innocent person”. Willingham’s stepmother is “thrilled that all this has come to light… [and is] not asking for compensation” but for “justice” (Schwartz 1). Cases like these have caused mixed controversies when it comes to capital punishment.
...ure or be used as a means for revenge. The death penalty is a severe penalty for a sever crime. I feel that it does work as a deterrent for crime because of its severity over any prison term. Capital punishment is necessary for a stable society and should not be abolished.
The people in support of the death penalty say that if murderers are sentenced to death, future committers will think about the consequences before they actually proceed with the crime. However, most murderers don’t expect or plan to be caught and weigh their fate. Because, murders are committed when the murderer is angry or passionate, or by drug abusers and people under the influence of drugs or alcohol ("Deterrence (In Opposition to the Death Penalty)”). Therefore, it will not deter future crimes and will actually increase the amount of murders because of society. As previously stated, the death penalty isn’t proven to prevent future murders and/or crimes because it actually increases the likelihood of committing murder. It doesn’t prevent future murders because it would upset the family and friends of the person who was executed. For example, if someone was executed by the death penalty and it was someones family member, then the person who lost their loved one by the execution would most likely commit murder in anger. If that person was executed the next family member would get angry and so on. The cycle would never end and would have more murders. There is no final proof that the death penalty is a better deterrent than other options. Not having the death penalty would be better because it could save many lives. For example, United States a country that uses the death penalty has a higher murder rate than Europe or Canada which are countries that do not use the death penalty. To get a little specific, the states in the United States that do not use the death penalty have a lower murder rate than the states that do.
The death penalty can in fact deter heinous crimes from being committed when it is lawful in a state. Social scientists have stated that the act of general deterrence, which is when the punishment deters potential criminals from committing crimes, keeps criminals from going through with crimes. However, it is more shown that premeditated crimes are usually the ones stopped by general deterrence, not crimes under passion. Heinous crimes have been reduced highly in the states that have a capital punishment law.
The authors constantly remind the reader that there is nothing inevitable about the innocence frame that now shuts out alternative interpretations. The innocence frame packs a wallop, but a list of murderers and their victims would dwarf the roster of the unjustly convicted. For now, however, the interlocking features of the innocence frame- the regular discovery of mistaken convictions, the rise of DNA testing, the proliferation of media stories filtered through the new frame, dramatic revelations of criminal shortcuts taken by police or crime labs, the spread of innocence projects- all fit together and dominate the debate. The cascade of innocence stories has begun to reshape public opinion (support for the death penalty has dropped dramatically) and public policy (fewer death sentences and executions). (Baumgartner, De Boef, & Boydstun,
The death penalty is immoral and should be removed from every justice system across America because it puts the lives of innocent people at risk. If someone is wrongfully convicted of murder and sentenced to death, there is a chance that they could be executed. Now an innocent victim and an innocent accused killer have died while the real killer is still free. Approximately 156 prisoners on death row have been exonerated, and it is impossible to tell how many more prisoners were innocent and still were executed (DPIC). An example of an innocent person being executed is the case of Cameron Willingham. Willingham was convicted of murdering three children in 1991 in a house fire. He was executed in 2004. A
On the other side of the debate, there are those that believe that the death penalty is a deterrent. For most criminals, they are aware of the fact that if they get caught, they will be sent to prison. However, other than being sent to prison, there are not really any other repercussions for committing a crime. They argue that if a person were to be presented with the possibility of the death penalty, they would more than likely think twice about their actions and realize that there are more risks than just im...
The death penalty deters murder. The death penalty is the best way to stop a killer from killing someone else. Some say that prison is enough, but it isn’t. Death is necessary because if they are only sent to prison there is always the risk that some day the same killer that brutally killed a 5-year old or raped and strangle a college student might return to the streets.
The death penalty deters murder by putting the fear of death into would be killers. A person is less likely to do something, if they a feeling that they will face a harsher consequence. Another method that the death penalty deters murder, is the fact that if the killer is dead, they will not be able to take another human life again. The many supporters of the death penalty feel that convict would be punished for the crimes they have committed against society, and whether it will deter the crimes rate shouldn’t be the big issue. Supporters of the death penalty are in favor of making examples out of offenders. When someone is threatened with death that automatically makes the human with common sense deter from committing a crime. According to
The use of capital punishment greatly discourages any wrongdoers from committing any crime such as murder. Many people’s greatest fear is death; therefore if they know that death is a possible consequence for their actions, they are less likely to perform such actions. Ernest van den Haag, a professor and author of “Punishing Criminals:Concerning a Very Old and Painful Question” wrote about the issue of deterrence: “…capital punishment is likely to deter more than other punishments because people fear death more than anything else. They fear most death deliberately inflicted by law and scheduled by the courts…the threat of the death penalty may deter some murderers who otherwise might not have been deterred. And surely the death penalty is the only penalty that could deter prisoners already serving a life sentence and tempted to kill a guard, or offenders about to be arrested and facing a life sentence.”
There needs to be something that deters people from committing these crimes. The death penalty sets an example to keep inmates in line and could even potentially keep them out of jail. Supporters for the death penalty say that it can do just that. It creates fear that discourages future crimes, punishment, and justice for those who have been wronged. Michael Summers wrote that, “Our recent research shows that each execution carried out is correlated with about 74 fewer murders the following year... The study examined the relationship between the number of executions and the number of murders in the U.S.” This proves that the main reason behind the death penalty is working. Even if it did not deter criminals from crimes the death penalty still makes it so that there are less murderous criminals in the