Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Iron man character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
1. How frequently is dialogue used? Is the dialogue always distinct? Does it sometimes overlap? If it does, with what consequences? • In the movie Iron Man, dialogue is often used and for the most part very distinctive. Tony Stark often partakes in dialogue with Yinsen, his fellow prison mate when he was taken hostage at the beginning of the film. Also, Stark is often in dialogue with Pepper, his assistant and love interest, his friend Lieutenant Colonel James Rhodes, and his business partner and later arch foe, Obadiah Stane. • For the most part dialogue does not overlap in this film however, there are a few scenes that is does. For example, when Stark and Rhodes are flying to a missile demonstration on Stark’s private jet, they become very intoxicated and begin to speak over one another. It makes it hard to understand their conversation but it also very humorous because it is a realistic moment. In reality, intoxicated individuals often yell over each other’s voices and slur their words. Another example of overlapping dialogue is when Stark is virtually drowned as means of torture to force him to make his captors, a well-known terrorist group, a missile. As Stark …show more content…
It used before Tony decides not to read his cover story cards during his press release. He has to choose to read the cover story or admit to the world he is Iron Man. The scene goes silence for approximately two seconds and then Tony smirks and admits he is Iron Man. Immediately thereafter the Rock N Roll theme song “I Am Iron Man” loudly plays as Tony walks off the stage and dozen reporters yell dozens of questions. Moreover, sound is used between scenes to create fear and suspense when Piper is retrieving hidden files from Stark’s old office at his request. Suddenly. Stane walks in. Pepper is startled and instantly a loud scary orchestra sound alarms. This created a great deal of suspense and now the audience fears for Pepper’s
Conversation Analysis (CA) is the study of talk-within-interaction that attempts to describe the orderliness, structure and sequential patterns of interaction in conversation. It is a method of qualitative analysis developed by Harvey Sacks with the aid of Emmanuel Schegloff and Gail Jefferson in the late 1960s to early 1970s. Using the CA frame of mind to view stories shows us that what we may think to be simplistic relaying of information or entertaining our friends is in fact a highly organised social phenomena that is finely tuned in a way that expresses the teller’s motivation behind the talk. (Hutchby & Wooffitt, 2011). It is suggested that CA relies on three main assumptions; talk is a form of social action, action is structurally organised, talk creates and maintains inter-subjectivity (Atkinson & Heritage, 1984).
Key terms will be pointed out and highlighted, as well as described in relation to the examples extracted from the film. To begin with the film started out with a communication climate that was both tense and without verbal communication. This was mainly due to the variance in membership constructs of the characters involved. The character's included the brain Brian, Andrew the athlete, the criminal Bender, the princess Claire, and the basket case Allison. There was a great deal of interesting nonverbal communication taking place between these people. Their reactions and responses to each other demonstrated perceptual errors, which would be shown as the story progressed.
The speech “War Message” by former president Woodrow Wilson is one of the most memorable speeches of all time. He is able to capture the audience’s attention and really make them listen with the help of many rhetorical elements. Woodrow Wilson is by far one of the best presidents this nation has ever seen and also one of the best speakers of all time. The magnitude of this speech and what it is about gives it such an appeal without even trying. The rhetorical elements of this text such as ethos, pathos, and logos are what gives this speech its credibility, its powerfulness, and its persuasiveness.
Boom! A gunshot at a theatre is heard... and unfortunately a great leader falls a week after giving a very famous speech called the second inaugural address of Abraham Lincoln. This essay is called upon and told to his fellow countrymen of both the north and south so that we all come as one. The author argues to the occurrence of the war and that there should be peace amongst the land.
In Martin Luther King, Jr.’s speech, “I have a Dream,” he inspires the crowd to take a stand with the following words, “Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.” Clay felt like he had been quite for far too long, listening to Lula the Hyena harass him with her belittling words. Lula tells lies, is deceitful, and manipulative; these characteristics represent the oppressive white community. I will describe to you how Clay’s reactions, Dutchman, were solely based on Lula preying upon his weaknesses, like the troubles that the black race felt while battling Civil Rights.
Pages 261- 267. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.10.006. Cameron, D. (2001). The 'Case Working with spoken discourse and communication. London: Thousand Oaks & Co. Carson, C., & Cupach, W. (2000).
Abraham Lincoln spoke with confidence and inspiration in his second inaugural address because he was seeking for reconciliation, he acted as if everyone wanting to save the union was on the same side. Keeping in mind the end goal to attempt and adjust for the transgression of bondage. However, Lincoln’s form of expression, rhetorical devices, and organization offered him assistance with convincing the group of onlookers that the countries fate was still brilliant.
Abraham Lincoln, known for his revolutionary campaign that was the first to state slavery was wrong. History portrays Abraham Lincoln as someone who wanted equal rights for all races that statement is not necessarily true. He wanted the slaves to be free but did not think that whites and blacks could live peacefully together. He changes the way he words things in his speeches in order to gain both sides of the disagreement in order to hold office. His views on slavery increases dramatically while the United States becomes closer to fighting in the civil war.
It’s amazing how much we learn about people from what they say. One way to achieve this is through carefully constructed dialogue. Work to create dialogue that allows the characters’ personalities and voices to emerge through unique word selection and the use of active rather than passive voice.
Dialogue gives the audience a clear view of what is happening in the story, but the
The disturbing scene where different nationalities badger their opinions on each other shows poor communication and horrible stereotyping. Pino's Italian slang, Mookies black talk, and Korean obscenities are all mixed together to show how communication grows impossible among different ethnic groups. Spike Lee is trying to show how nonsense language results in a snowball effect which worsens any situation. Lorene Cary states her view on this situation when she comments, "We need more of them, not less; more words . . . What I do want is language: fighting words, love poems, elegance, dissonance, dissing, signifying, alarms, whistles, scholarly texts, political oratory, the works. Without it, we're dead."("As plain as Black and White") Maybe these "fighting words" unlock the truth about the communication plague, spreading throughout history. Leonard P. Zakin once said, " . . . it's all about conversation, not dialogue."("Scaling the Walls of Hatred") Like the characters in Do the Right Thing, present day people can scream at each other all they want and will not get anywhere because outcry is not conversation. Conversation is talking, explaining, discussing, informing, and most definitely listening.
The film starts out with orchestral music, and shows James Dean's character, Jim, drunk on the ground of a sidewalk. The sound of a police siren is heard and used as a transition into the next scene that takes place, understandably, in a police station. While in the police station, Jim is yelling along with the sound of the siren, and humming loudly to give the impression that he is drunk. At one point in the scene he is brought into another room with an officer, and begins to punch a desk. The sound effects are loud, and the he pauses, and music begins again when he begins to hurt. Again, a siren is played at the transition to the next scene. However, for the most part, score music is played during all transitions.
Dialogue is one of the ways Jeff Greene comes to life. Dialogue is what a character says and how they interact with others verbally or, through other methods of communication.“ ‘It’ll be good to get back to work, wont it?’ the Professor asked Jeff. Jeff said yes” (Voigt 16). Jeff is shown to be someone who doesn’t want conflict since, giving a simple ‘Yes’ answer gave him a personality making him seem like a real person. Dialogue is shown to be another important way of how Jeff Greene comes to life along with the other author’s craft
“Communication problems, beyond the obvious language differences, became a real barrier to honest dialogue”.
The characters, in Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice, come to life through dialogue. Some characters have an inability to stop talking, while others remain quite and save their words for times when they need to convey their feelings. The dialogue in Pride and Prejudice is unlike that of Shakespeare's play where characters have lengthy monologues, the dialogue is more conversational, very witty and clever. Rarely is there a character embarking on a extensive speech, and there are not any chapters solely devoted to describing each and every physical characteristic of each person. Jane Austen uses dialogue to portray the personality of her characters, to allow the reader to see the underlying feelings and meanings behind the characters words.