Iron Jawed Angels Analysis

710 Words2 Pages

A Vote for Ladies’ Liberty “Give me liberty or give me death.” Patrick Henry brings a profound idea to the surface, a life without freedom, is worse than being dead. Throughout history, there recurring patterns of control and revolution. Whether revolt is violent and gory, like the American Revolution, or peaceful exemplified by Gandhi’s nonviolent protest, it involves discrimination on some level. “Deja Vu” ensues at the turn of the 20th century with women suffragists.In Iron Jawed Angels by Katja von Garnier, a dramatized depiction of the push for women’s suffrage centralized around efforts and conflicts of NAWSA, National American Women’s Suffrage Association, then later on, the NWA, National Women’s Association. The director accentuates the idea that because NAWSA’s methodologies are …show more content…

Their method for the push of women’s rights resided in the support from state and local levels of government, or state by state. Lock Jawed Angels takes place when only 8 states had established women’s suffrage in 22 years. NAWSA’s plan was too slow and too passive for women like Alice Paul and Lucy Burns, who joined NAWSA’s Congressional Committee in 1912. DIsplayed as stalwart, brilliant, and passionate, these two women, “worked with Emmeline and Christabel Pankhurst in the militant wing of the British suffrage movement.” The British suffrage movement involved more violent and extreme approaches in their pushes; it was not uncommon for women in the British suffrage to have been arrested during protests. Through their participation, “radicalized” Lucy Burns and Alice Paul attempted to institute similar methodologies in America, but NAWSA rejected them utterly. NAWSA believed that although the process was drawn-out, state support would come around and eventually have to be approved by

Open Document