Introduction To Monitoring And Monitoring In The Workplace Case Study

1382 Words3 Pages

INTRODUCTION TO MONITORING AND SURVEILANCE IN THE WORK PLACE As instructed by our lecture in IT Applications Dr. Larry Stapleton we were given a document entitled monitoring in the workplace. It was based on Blackburn Rovers Football Club who decided to install a software called Spector 360. The product provides company wide monitoring of employees on a day to day basis focused on their high level of internet based activities during the work period. The main purpose of this software is to improve productivity during work hours and reduce risk of exposure for the company. We also bring into consideration our opinion on the issue in question and also query if this method of surveillance is fair to the employees and also morally correct using the case study on Blackburn Rovers as an example for this. MAIN FEATURES OF THE CASE STUY ACCEPTABLE USAGE POLICY (AUP) Workplace is a place of work as the name suggests and if initial early monitoring showed signs of some employees abusing the easy going atmosphere of the workplace for their own gain it’s safe to say Blackburn Rovers could justify taking the initial testing further and fully implementing it within the organisation thus improve productivity from employees and lessen the risk of infection or malware or viral contamination which in turn can be a huge headache for the company. The employee must be informed with what monitoring is occurring as this could easily be mistaken as an invasion of an individual’s privacy. METHODS OF MONITORING The software they implemented would use various methods of monitoring in the workplace these include key logging, CCTV and recording telephone conversations. These methods can have various positive effects on a company but also some negative eff... ... middle of paper ... ...Professionals are trained and they would be expected to conform within the industry standards. In our personal opinion the companies who are willing to invest so much into monitoring in the work place should also be liable to be held accountable for their actions and in turn also the suffering be it emotionally or financially as a result of negligence in the system they implemented within the organisation. Although it is certain in our eyes that Mrs Copeland is not in the wrong in this scenario it is unclear of who actually is in the college. If she was to pursue legal action it is unsure of who she should actually pursue to receive compensation for the unauthorised monitoring of her in the workplace. There should be more stringent rules so the person to blame could be much more easily identified by the victim and by the courts in which the case would be taken to.

Open Document