Into The Wild Is Chris Mccandless A Tragic Hero

1216 Words3 Pages

The story of Alexander Supertramp A.K.A. Chris Mccandless (novelized in Into the Wild, by Jon Krakauer) is one of a boy who, not content with his societal position, journeys across the country (from Georgia to Alaska) in search of a great adventure. Along the way, Chris meets a plethora of people in all walks of life. The novelization of him is written in such a way to promote freeing oneself of the shackles of society and running off in search of adventure. The Christopher Mccandles of the novel can be associated with an article, written by Arthur Miller, titled “Tragedy and the Common Man”. In the article, Miller outlines 4 major qualifications required to be considered a tragic hero. Although Chris may fit all of Miller’s qualifications …show more content…

The first major qualification that Miller outlines is that the primary struggle of a tragic hero must be his or her search for their deserved place in society. In the story of Chris, this is painful evident near beginning of the movie, when he is sitting with his parents in the diner. His parents offer him material things countless times, with him refusing every time. Through his shifty posture, the audience perceives the level of discomfort he feels being in that situation. Though the audience later sees that this moment was not the primary motivator for Chris, it was a catalyzing event that tipped him over the edge. The shot itself shows that Chris’ “rightful place” (or where he perceived it), was not with his family. So he adventured off in search of it. With this, Krakauer also exemplifies the second qualification of Miller’s: a tragedy should question the status quo. The entire journey of Chris is evident of this trait in him. Particularly strong symbolism to this effect was evident in the scene where Chris abandons his car and burns money. Paper money is a symbol of modern society in America because it is the prime directive of most in their daily lives. From thinking about it, to making it, to spending it, money makes the world go around; thus by burning it, Chris rejects the very notion of its importance (as fire is final and entirely destructive). The third …show more content…

Chris is not a tragic hero quite simply because he is not a hero at all. Immediately preceding any other part of the story, Krakauer shows Chris displaying an unheroic trait through Gallien the truck driver. When “Gallien offered to drive Alex all the way to Anchorage, buy him some decent gear, and then drive him back,” Chris rejects his offer claiming he will “be fine with what [he’s] got” (Krakauer 6). Chris does not value the support of others, a decidedly unheroic trait. Heroes are not only brave in the face of adversary, but can also acknowledge gifts and experiences. Because not only is Chris refusing a gift, but also the experience Gallien brings to the instance. And a true hero respects the guidance of others. Chris, however, often displays a lack of regard for anybody that is not himself. Chris meets Ron Franz, an old man whose wife and son died in a car accident, in the California desert. And in the movie, it becomes evident that Ron’s attachment to Chris helps keep Ron motivated to move on with life. Ron even asks to adopt Chris in the hopes that Chris will not leave him alone, again. As Chris is leaving him, Ron even breaks down in tears that Chris coldly ignores claiming that Ron would be fine alone. Chris refuses to postpone his vague goals of travelling to Alaska, even for an old man who was nothing but good to him. A

Open Document